Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You're in Canada and you're making pronouncements to Americans' about constitutionally-protected free speech. I find that ironic. Or, if you prefer, hypocritical.
Explain how it's hypocritical or ironic. Do I support the Canadian system? When a thread opens up on abuses under the Canadian system, you can bet I'll be there.
Get a clue, please.
I've always had my suspicions about those bloodless Canadians.
Horrid, horrid people up there in Canadia. We ought to nuke them. It says so in the Bible.
I agree that the rules are flawed, and the people should not have been arrested. Those policemen could have handled the situation much more reasonably and less violently even with the rules standing.
Horrid, horrid people up there in Canadia. We ought to nuke them. It says so in the Bible.
I agree that the rules are flawed, and the people should not have been arrested. Those policemen could have handled the situation much more reasonably and less violently even with the rules standing.
Explain how it's hypocritical or ironic. Do I support the Canadian system?
Suppose you tell us. Then we'll know.
Quote:
When a thread opens up on abuses under the Canadian system, you can bet I'll be there.
You honesty don't think that your (potential; we don't know what you think) support for the absurdly broad Canadian "hate crimes" laws would tend to make your opinions on the US slightly suspect?
?HATE CRIMES? LAWS USED AGAINST CHRISTIANS IN CANADA | Persecution | Way of Life Literature (http://www.wayoflife.org/files/706fe196bc5dd6068bb1a96eefc8b4be-109.html - broken link)
"It is already said that there are so many laws, rules and regulations in the US that each person in the US breaks at least one law per day, if not much more - without even knowing it. But the US Government is becoming more obvious in how it will go about making everyone a criminal and fining them ridiculous amounts of money in doing so."
The laws allowing firearms in National Parks only allow it in those states where the carrying of firearms is already allowed and disallowing it in all others.
It disallows in DC because DC does not allow the carrying of firearms in public, open or concealed, IIRC.
back on topic: if Congress must pass the laws and/or regulations for the Nat. Parks Dept.; and since they do not require a permit for free speech, then is it possible that these people were arrested for unruly conduct, disturbing the peace, and resisting arrest? Have actual charges been filed or where they simply detained, removed, and released? Do we know?
I'm still attempting to understand where Libertarians draw the line between their fist and the next person's nose. You have not given me that answer.
The laws allowing firearms in National Parks only allow it in those states where the carrying of firearms is already allowed and disallowing it in all others.
It disallows in DC because DC does not allow the carrying of firearms in public, open or concealed, IIRC.
back on topic: if Congress must pass the laws and/or regulations for the Nat. Parks Dept.; and since they do not require a permit for free speech, then is it possible that these people were arrested for unruly conduct, disturbing the peace, and resisting arrest? Have actual charges been filed or where they simply detained, removed, and released? Do we know?
I'm still attempting to understand where Libertarians draw the line between their fist and the next person's nose. You have not given me that answer.
I don't know if he did. Whether he did or didn't is of no concern to me. No permit is required under the Constitution. I have a suspicion that even if Beck did not obtain a permit and if his rally had been laid seige to by police, that you'd be up in arms over it, since you may (correct me if I'm wrong) support his views.
I suppose you also supported the protesters trashing the State Capital in Wisconsin. They didn't have a permit.
Glenn Beck did, he believes in the rule of law. Btw, Glenn's gathering was not a protest.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
