Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-25-2011, 12:21 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
Is that flat across all income sources, or does it give special preference to income acquired through capital gains and dividends?
Depends on what the federal government deems worthy of encouraging. If they encourage innovation and economic growth, then capital gains and dividends will be taxed at a lower rate.

Quote:
Some people consider income gained from capital gains and dividends to be "double taxation", but I do not.
Again, it depends on what the federal government deems worthy of encouraging. Is innovation and economic growth desired? No? Then tax capital gains, etc., the same as income.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-25-2011, 12:28 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,745,293 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Depends on what the federal government deems worthy of encouraging. If they encourage innovation and economic growth, then capital gains and dividends will be taxed at a lower rate.

Again, it depends on what the federal government deems worthy of encouraging. Is innovation and economic growth desired? No? Then tax capital gains, etc., the same as income.
hah.

so wage-earners don't innovate, only capital-owners?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2011, 12:39 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
hah.

so wage-earners don't innovate, only capital-owners?
What makes you think wage-earners aren't capital owners?

Remember... CalPERS is the biggest US investor. Do you want to tax all those public employee pensioners on their capital gains? They contribute very little to their pension, so their cost basis is going to be extremely small. That will add up to a HUGE tax bill.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2011, 12:43 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,745,293 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
What makes you think wage-earners aren't capital owners?
Well, I don't think that, you just inferred that I'm talking about discrete sets of people. Being a capital owner is a role, and being a wage earner is a role. You can be both, you can be one of the two, or you can be neither.

Now the question still remains, of why you think wage earners are less innovative than capital owners.

Quote:
Remember... CalPERS is the biggest US investor. Do you want to tax all those public employee pensioners on their capital gains? They contribute very little to their pension, so their cost basis is going to be extremely small.
Sure, CalPERS needs to pay their fair share too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2011, 12:50 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
Well, I don't think that. You ought not put words in my mouth like that.
You posted this, which implies wage-earners are not capital owners.
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
hah.

so wage-earners don't innovate, only capital-owners?

Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
Now the question still remains, of why you think wage earners are less innovative than capital owners.
Any capital owner contributes to innovation. That includes capital owning wage-earners.

Quote:
Sure, CalPERS needs to pay their fair share too.
So, you want to raise the amount of taxes taken from public employee pensions? And everyone's retirement plans, really, as they will ALL have capital gains.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2011, 01:14 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,745,293 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Any capital owner contributes to innovation. That includes capital owning wage-earners.
I'm talking about the role of owning capital and the role of earning wages, which are roles clearly taken from the tax code. How do you figure that one creates more innovation than the other?

Quote:
So, you want to raise the amount of taxes taken from public employee pensions? And everyone's retirement plans, really, as they will ALL have capital gains.
I want it to be equal to the rates people pay on wages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2011, 01:18 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
How about wage earners who DON'T own capital?
Who would that be?

Quote:
I want it to be equal to the rates people pay on wages.
That would work if we had a 10% or even a 15% flat tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2011, 01:23 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,745,293 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Who would that be?
Like I said earlier, it's not a question of "who", it's a question of roles.

I understand that this is complicated and it may be asking too much for you to try and understand. This is the P&OC forum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2011, 01:26 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,060 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by le roi View Post
Like I said earlier, it's not a question of "who", it's a question of roles.
Okay... I'll play. Which 'roles' do you think don't own capital?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2011, 01:30 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,745,293 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Okay... I'll play. Which 'roles' do you think don't own capital?
That'd be the non-innovators that you were talking about here:


Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
If they encourage innovation and economic growth, then capital gains and dividends will be taxed at a lower rate.

Is innovation and economic growth desired? No? Then tax capital gains, etc., the same as income.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top