Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-23-2011, 06:06 AM
 
2,908 posts, read 3,874,059 times
Reputation: 3170

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by simetime View Post
Kudos to you for making simple enough for the simple minded
Either way, the 1.2 T in cuts is a drop in the bucket and will make little to no impact. Unless the administration figures out a way to get the private sector going again, we are heading toward another credit downgrade. Obama already holds the distinction of being the only US president sit in office for a US credit downgrade. Wanna try for two?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-23-2011, 06:12 AM
 
2,908 posts, read 3,874,059 times
Reputation: 3170
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
My comments in plain text.

Do you honestly believe that a credit downgrade will have no impact?

Do you believe that the expiration of Bush tax cuts will make a dent in the deficit? Or that families making $250,000 benefited tremendously from these cuts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2011, 08:45 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,951,723 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by theS5 View Post
Do you honestly believe that a credit downgrade will have no impact?
Since the credit downgrade had no impact in August I see no reason any future one would. Besides, if you read the S&P report on the downgrade they said:
Quote:
“On Aug. 5, 2011, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services lowered its long-term sovereign credit rating on the United States of America to ‘AA+’ from ‘AAA’. The outlook on the long-term rating is negative … the prolonged controversy over raising the statutory debt ceiling and the related fiscal policy debate indicate that further near-term progress containing the growth in public spending, especially on entitlements, or on reaching an agreement on raising revenues is less likely than we previously assumed and will remain a contentious and fitful process.”
S&P was concerned about the political process that prevents the government from lowering costs or raising taxes due to political polarization.

What was the bond market's reaction? The U.S. can borrow at zero or negative real interest rates:



This is how to calculate a potential downgrade:



Quote:
Originally Posted by theS5 View Post
Do you believe that the expiration of Bush tax cuts will make a dent in the deficit?
Since the Bush tax-cuts were the single most important factor in creating the long term debt, the answer is 'yes.' According to TPM,
Quote:
[making the Bush tax-cuts] permanent, [will have] a total cost of $3.8 trillion over 10 years.
Quote:
Originally Posted by theS5 View Post
Or that families making $250,000 benefited tremendously from these cuts?
That's not even debatable. The top income bracket benefited disproportionally from the Bush tax-cuts. While the top 1% was benefited disproportional, the biggest benefit went to the top 0.1% since capital gains, their prime income source, had the rate cut to 15%.

Quote:
Tax Cuts Offer Most for Very Rich, Study Says

Families earning more than $1 million a year saw their federal tax rates drop more sharply than any group in the country as a result of President Bush’s tax cuts, according to a new Congressional study.

The study, by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, also shows that tax rates for middle-income earners edged up in 2004, the most recent year for which data was available, while rates for people at the very top continued to decline.

Based on an exhaustive analysis of tax records and census data, the study reinforced the sense that while Mr. Bush’s tax cuts reduced rates for people at every income level, they offered the biggest benefits by far to people at the very top — especially the top 1 percent of income earners.
This is from The Atlantic:

Quote:


The Bush tax cuts are not merely a special procedure for the top 0.1 percent, but rather a full body surgery on the entire tax code. The permanent extension of the 10, 25 and 28 percent tax brackets, for example, add $800 billion to our debt over ten years, more than the permanent extension of the top brackets for families making more than $250,000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2011, 10:05 AM
 
Location: The Land of Reason
13,221 posts, read 12,322,952 times
Reputation: 3554
Quote:
Originally Posted by theS5 View Post
Either way, the 1.2 T in cuts is a drop in the bucket and will make little to no impact. Unless the administration figures out a way to get the private sector going again, we are heading toward another credit downgrade. Obama already holds the distinction of being the only US president sit in office for a US credit downgrade. Wanna try for two?
Nothing is going to get done until the refuticans get norquist off of their backs and make some concessions to tax increases for the real wealthy, and quit fighting against EVERYTHING that the president suggest and people stop believing everything that faux puts out
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-24-2011, 09:06 PM
 
Location: Beautiful Niagara Falls ON.
10,016 posts, read 12,580,750 times
Reputation: 9030
I like the way we do a budget here in Canada. The ruling party brings a budget to the floor of the house. If it does not pass the government falls and we have an election. It's a case of "Nonconfidence". If the house does not have confidence in the government then the government has lost the ability to run the country. It's a very simple concept.

The American system in contrast is an ongoing case of nonconfidence. The country can and has for many years just limped along with little or no government action at all. The bureaucrats are running the country and the government sits there as useless as can be. It really is quite amazing to me to see a government that has a party majority in both houses of congress and holds the office of president and yet by the stupid rules of the congress the minority opposition can stall, prevent and subvert the government and stop anything from being done. I really believe that things are not going to be good at all in the American body politic until there is some major reform of the system and how is that possible seeing even the easy things can't get done. It's a classic catch 22.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2011, 10:31 AM
 
Location: The Land of Reason
13,221 posts, read 12,322,952 times
Reputation: 3554
Quote:
Originally Posted by theS5 View Post
Either way, the 1.2 T in cuts is a drop in the bucket and will make little to no impact. Unless the administration figures out a way to get the private sector going again, we are heading toward another credit downgrade. Obama already holds the distinction of being the only US president sit in office for a US credit downgrade. Wanna try for two?

And have you ever wonder why that every president before the current one had no probelm with negotiating the debt ceiling, but along comes the teabaggers and all hell breaks loose The interesting thing about it the right blames the president for the congress's inaction No one mentions the fact that the republicans(not all) signed an unbreakable and outdated pledge not to raise taxes under any reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2011, 10:54 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
14,317 posts, read 22,388,935 times
Reputation: 18436
I didn't know President Obama was on the Supercommittee.

The Supercommittee, created as a means to bypass the tea party Republicans in the House who were breaking Congress with their unqualified idiocy, failed because of the Republicans on the committee.

We are struggling with a post-Bush economy. President Bush gave President Obama an economy that was badly damaged, neglected, mangled, and broken as only Republicans can accomplish this. Republican solutions are NOT going to fix the problem that Republicans created. Absurd even having Republicans at the table. This is what the 2012 election is about --> Getting Republicans away from the table.

This great President needs a Congress that is as advanced and effective as he is, not one hampered by the hapless Republicans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2011, 12:51 PM
 
Location: The Land of Reason
13,221 posts, read 12,322,952 times
Reputation: 3554
Quote:
Originally Posted by A_Lexus View Post
I didn't know President Obama was on the Supercommittee.

The Supercommittee, created as a means to bypass the tea party Republicans in the House who were breaking Congress with their unqualified idiocy, failed because of the Republicans on the committee.

We are struggling with a post-Bush economy. President Bush gave President Obama an economy that was badly damaged, neglected, mangled, and broken as only Republicans can accomplish this. Republican solutions are NOT going to fix the problem that Republicans created. Absurd even having Republicans at the table. This is what the 2012 election is about --> Getting Republicans away from the table.

This great President needs a Congress that is as advanced and effective as he is, not one hampered by the hapless Republicans.

Here! Here! How dare you speak the truth! It's treason I say, just plain old treason!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2011, 01:27 PM
 
656 posts, read 648,641 times
Reputation: 146
It is the job of congress to agree on these cuts. It isn't Obama's problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2011, 01:36 PM
 
Location: #
9,598 posts, read 16,568,283 times
Reputation: 6324
Quote:
Originally Posted by Earlyretired View Post
Never gonna stop whining are ya....

We don't want to give you any more of our $$$ that's why we vote for Republicans...
Really? You vote Republican because you don't want to give us anymore of your money?

That's kind of like someone saying, "I stand behind a rabid stallion in heat because I don't like to get kicked in the head."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top