L.A. may require porn actors to use condoms in films (cost, parties)

[AnUnidentifiedMale]

Originally Posted by chielgirl

//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...ctors-use.html

Didn't like your first poll on this topic?

No, my first poll was fine, but that was when the law was only being discussed. Now that it's passed, it's worth discussing again. If you don't like it, then skip it.

[EuroTrashed]

Originally Posted by tvdxer

There shouldn't be any porn actors, simple as that.

Hmm only porn actresses? You sir are a genius!

[andrea3821]

They should leave it up to the "actors."

[alphamale]

That's all they have to worry about?

[AnUnidentifiedMale]

I predict that L.A.'s loss will be San Francisco's gain.

But at least they're not requiring condoms for oral sex, as far as I can tell.

[HurricaneDC]

I thought they filmed most porn in the SFV anyway.

[AnUnidentifiedMale]

Originally Posted by HurricaneDC

I thought they filmed most porn in the SFV anyway.

Most of the San Fernando Valley is in the city of L.A.

City of Los Angeles Map - Larger View

[Jonny45]

In today's day and age, those actors and actresses are tested and checked more than any of the general population. I bet those gals are cleaner than most of the bar room fluzies!

[temazepam]

I'm surprised they didn't do this back when we first heard of the AIDS epidemic back in the 80s.

[A Common Anomaly]

I am flabbergasted, not only at this regulation, but at the fact that people were protesting the use of condoms use in porn. WTF is this world coming to?




Here is a protip: If you **** a stranger who you don't know their sexual history of, then wear a condom. If you **** a porn star by chance, then double up. If you ever a **** a member of the Bush family, do the opposite of George Bush and practice responsible withdrawal. This is just common sense.