Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The first point is disproven by the mere fact that we've created amino acids, the building blocks of life, from non-life.
Have you read anything about amnio acids lately?
"Scientists have not been able to cause amino acids dissolved in water to join together to form proteins. The energy-requiring chemical reactions that join amino acids are reversible and do not occur spontaneously in water."1 The reason for this astonishing admission is that many evolutionists no longer believe that the first life came from proteins.
It's liberals who most pretend to believe in the laws of Darwin and evolution who most want to resist those laws.
If nature's culling improves a species, then why are we providing trillions of dollars of Medicaid, food stamps, and other welfare handouts to guarantee the least capable of surviving breed the most? Welfare isn't even about compassion for some weak helpless individual, the whole system is set up to guarantee the failures of human society breed the most and weaken the species.
It's liberals who most pretend to believe in the laws of Darwin and evolution who most want to resist those laws.
If nature's culling improves a species, then why are we providing trillions of dollars of Medicaid, food stamps, and other welfare handouts to guarantee the least capable of surviving breed the most? Welfare isn't even about compassion for some weak helpless individual, the whole system is set up to guarantee the failures of human society breed the most and weaken the species.
The first point is disproven by the mere fact that we've created amino acids, the building blocks of life, from non-life.
Have you read anything about amnio acids lately?
"Scientists have not been able to cause amino acids dissolved in water to join together to form proteins. The energy-requiring chemical reactions that join amino acids are reversible and do not occur spontaneously in water."1 The reason for this astonishing admission is that many evolutionists no longer believe that the first life came from proteins.
And it was Franics Galton, Darwin's cousin, who came up with Eugenics.
Yep, and Einstein helped urge the production of the atomic bomb.
It doesn't make his contribution any less real. Eugenics is real science, but its not human by most standards. But the poster above seems to be supporting Eugenics, I'm making them aware that of whom they are in league with.
Darwin truly worried about the reprecussions of his Theory, but in the end, it was the truth. Darwin relased his because others were coming to the same conclusions at the same time. Darwin was simply the most well known of those studying it.
I don't know why many fail to agree, but they rather believe in some book written hundreds of years ago. Most scientists have proven Darwinism on so many scales, so why do most humans won't buy it?
I will continue to place my belief in a loving God.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.