Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
even if it just 1 vote it is a problem. then that means that the process was played down for someone elses benefit.
also here in Wisconsin, there were alot more than just 23 fraudulent votes counted.
Yep, 7 out of 3,000,000 and all were people with felony convictions, hence not eligible to vote. I think those 7 just did not know they were not eligible, don't see that as fraud, a mistake, but, not fraud. Yep, big problem.
Yep, 7 out of 3,000,000 and all were people with felony convictions, hence not eligible to vote. I think those 7 just did not know they were not eligible, don't see that as fraud, a mistake, but, not fraud. Yep, big problem.
7 today, 70,000 tomorrow and 700,000 the day after that.
when is it a big enough problem for you?
even 1 vote fraudulently cast is bad for elections.
Yep, 7 out of 3,000,000 and all were people with felony convictions, hence not eligible to vote. I think those 7 just did not know they were not eligible, don't see that as fraud, a mistake, but, not fraud. Yep, big problem.
To me it's a problem when hundreds of thousands are inhibited to "protect" people like you from 7 mistakes.
better to have an id that is required and provided free of charge to citizens actually allowed to vote, than to let everyone vote, even those that not allowed to.
What was it, out of 10,000,000 votes, 23 frauds were found? Yep, now that a "real" problem.
I campaigned for a canidate for a local position and was privy to the local voter registry which is predominately Democrat and saw at least 25 questionable voters during the 2008 election in my ward alone BOB.
ACORN made there rounds trying to sign up every Dick,Tom Cindy and Sue they could find we had votes cast from vacant condemned houses or from people no longer residents living here.I know who lives in my neighborhood, what properties are inhabited and I.D 's or a current utility bill is all that is required to vote providing that they have been a current resident and registered with the Board of Elections.
Ah yes, Holder is looking into stopping things like that. The problem is that 69% of people in the latest Rasmussen poll about ID cards and voting disagree with Holder and his boss. I don't think they care about that number if they can destroy the state laws that are so much needed in too many cases.
Source these hundreds of thousands being inhibited
Brennan Law Center says it could impact 3.2 mill Nationwide, how many in Wisc, hard to say, but very likely much more than 7. But do continue to pretend it would not affect certain segments of voters disproportionally. Some people may believe you.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
