Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ankeny mistakenly concluded that the 14th Amendment case of Wong Kim Ark ruled Wong Kim Ark to be a “natural born Citizen” rather than a born “citizen of the United States.” The Ankeny court also incorrectly equated a British "natural born subject" with a U.S. "natural born Citizen" and incorrectly relied upon Wong Kim Ark.
sorry, but if they did as you claim, why didn't Akeny appeal?
Oh wait, because unlike you, I trust the court than some no-name non legal expert who thinks that their are three citizenship classes in America, despit 200 years of legal court findings that say there are only 2.
That makes no sense when the founders intent was to insure allegiance to this country, above any other.
And you are not born with allegiance. You learn allegiance. Citizenship doesn't guarantee allegiance (as we have seen with our own traitorous citizens)
And our founders recognized this by saying that allegiance is not born, but earned.
Quote:
So they would want a citizen born of 2 citizen parents. That is the only reasonable and logical conclusion that can be drawn.
Nope. that's a stretch of the imagination. Our founders were lawyers, many of them were schooled in English Common Law. Our Constitution is based on English Common Law, by the fact that Blackstone was quoted most often
Vattel - only quoted 3 times, all to do with INTERNATIONAL LAW for which the founders kneew he was an expert.
However, the REST of the US CONSTITUTION goes against the beliefs of Vattel, namely the first 2 Amendments in the Bill of Rights goes a complete opposite of what Vattel felt (He didn't believe in free speech, and certainly did not believe that private citizens could own any type of weapon).
Yes there are plenty of those type people who agree with me.
Here's one. He's a Constitutional law professor. Please listen closely.
Herb Titus? You're using the "I found Christ again, and all law is originated with God, and unless we change our judicial system to recognize this, all judges shold be removed for not recognizing that God is our leader" nutcase?
That his beliefs were so extreme, that he was fired from his position at Regent Law School
The same Herb Titus that never references Vattel or even 2 parent requirements?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
