Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-07-2007, 11:17 AM
 
Location: Oak Park, IL
5,525 posts, read 13,953,705 times
Reputation: 3908

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by south-to-west View Post
Everyone on here has provided great insight into the issue. My own opinion is that universal coverage just makes plain sense. Although not perfect, it would be way more cost effective and efficient than our current system. Also, the average American who is covered by insurance wouldn't have to worry about paying obscene copays and deductions, nor would they have to worry about being denied treatment. I wouldn't mind at all paying more taxes for such a system.
Additionally, budding entrepreneurs could start their own company without worrying about losing healthcare coverage. This is a very pro-capitalist feature.

Anyone else wanting to change jobs wouldn't worry about losing healthcare coverage, either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-07-2007, 11:36 AM
 
Location: Brusssels
1,949 posts, read 3,864,438 times
Reputation: 1921
First, we need tort reform to reduce the massive inflation it causes to health care costs. Between malpractice insurance, uneeded tests (ordered to legally cover the docs butt), and meds overpriced for the same reason - health care in America costs way more than it should.

Fix this first, then the cost of adopting any new plan to extend coverage becomes much easier to pass through Congress.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2007, 04:39 PM
 
1,266 posts, read 2,508,923 times
Reputation: 441
It's socialism. This is not a socialist country. Who do you think is going to pay for it? Check the constiution, it's not the governments place......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2007, 07:12 PM
 
Location: Cortland, Ohio
3,343 posts, read 10,937,749 times
Reputation: 1586
What do you call social-security?? Public transportation? Public schools? Is this socialism too????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2007, 08:06 PM
 
Location: Norman, OK
3,478 posts, read 7,256,496 times
Reputation: 1201
Quote:
Originally Posted by crittersitter View Post
It's socialism. This is not a socialist country. Who do you think is going to pay for it? Check the constiution, it's not the governments place......
The Constitution also doesn't say that the government has to provide money for schools. Should we stop doing that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2007, 08:28 PM
 
6,613 posts, read 16,588,243 times
Reputation: 4787
Quote:
Originally Posted by sukwoo View Post
Additionally, budding entrepreneurs could start their own company without worrying about losing healthcare coverage. This is a very pro-capitalist feature.

Anyone else wanting to change jobs wouldn't worry about losing healthcare coverage, either.
Exactly! The only reason the US has employer-based health care coverage is because of a fluke of history (i.e., WWII-era wage controls).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2007, 08:59 PM
 
58 posts, read 295,643 times
Reputation: 35
I live in Canada and really want to move to the us but this is the only thing holding me back at this point
besides all the companies denying care etc our heath care system is just cheaper
we have about 2-5 percent admin cost and i think i heard a radio show on oprah xm say yours is about 20percent
thats alot of rich ceo's getting that way off the backs of people - like you paying a lot every month.
and even if you pay its not gauranteed the company will honor thier commitment- say you dont really need the surgery, medication etc

EWhen ever i think of health care in the us i think of the movie where the man had to take over the hospital to get his son surgery- they basically told him becose he couldnt pay for surgery to take his son home to die
that is 100 perecnt wrong and shameful
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2007, 02:52 PM
 
Location: ABQ (Paradise Hills), NM
741 posts, read 2,923,355 times
Reputation: 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xpat View Post
First, we need tort reform to reduce the massive inflation it causes to health care costs. Between malpractice insurance, uneeded tests (ordered to legally cover the docs butt), and meds overpriced for the same reason - health care in America costs way more than it should.
Excellent point. Shakespeare may have been on the right track when he wrote in Henry VI, "The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers."


Quote:
Originally Posted by CortlandGirl79 View Post
What do you call social-security?? Public transportation? Public schools? Is this socialism too????
Yet another excellent point! Yes, these are examples (in varying degree) of Socialism, particularly those instances that involve the Federal government.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wxjay View Post
The Constitution also doesn't say that the government has to provide money for schools. Should we stop doing that?
Actually, yes, at least on a Federal level. The Federal government has no Consitutional authority to administer, regulate, or otherwise interfere with the nation's educational system. This should be completely administered by state and local entities. The Federal Dept. of Education should never have been created. Four words say it all: "No Child Left Behind".

The Federal government has a limited number of specified powers, including the right to levy taxes, declare war, and regulate interstate and foreign commerce. Establishing a Nanny state that cares for you from cradle to grave isn't one of them.

Chap
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2007, 05:16 PM
 
10,239 posts, read 19,610,755 times
Reputation: 5943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaparral View Post
Excellent point. Shakespeare may have been on the right track when he wrote in Henry VI, "The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers."



Yet another excellent point! Yes, these are examples (in varying degree) of Socialism, particularly those instances that involve the Federal government.

Actually, yes, at least on a Federal level. The Federal government has no Consitutional authority to administer, regulate, or otherwise interfere with the nation's educational system. This should be completely administered by state and local entities. The Federal Dept. of Education should never have been created. Four words say it all: "No Child Left Behind".

The Federal government has a limited number of specified powers, including the right to levy taxes, declare war, and regulate interstate and foreign commerce. Establishing a Nanny state that cares for you from cradle to grave isn't one of them.

Chap

Well said! I've got other irons in the fire at the moment, so can't really wade into this one. And, to be truthful, don't know a whole lot about it all. BUT...I notice that most of those who advocate socialized health care don't seem to know or care a fidlers damn about something that even someone so ignorant of economics as I am, understands. Which is, that "costs" are not something that can be reduced. Yes, the PRICE can be lowered for a service, but the cost behind it can't be. Somehow or another, that cost will translate into a higher price somewhere else.

Anyway, keep speaking common sense Chaparell!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2007, 06:12 PM
 
58 posts, read 295,643 times
Reputation: 35
Well if there are unnessesary "costs" going to pay insurance companies directors, ceos over inlfated salaries- this is a cost that can be decreased and not go somewhere else
also you wont have shareholder of the company expecting to get dividends paid to them so there is another cost that would disapear and not just be shuffled to somewhere else

Health care is a right
not a privilage
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:28 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top