Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-26-2012, 12:24 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,364,082 times
Reputation: 7990

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by geeoro View Post
The Republicans have done nothing but criticize Obama for withdrawing our troops from Iraq and they will criticize him again when he gets our guys out of Afghanisan........... Bush got our guys killed for no reason (except oil and to revenge his dad's failure to get Saddam) and now Our President is bringing our troops home...........
One would really have to work to get any more b*****-ackwards than that. Democrats did nothing but scream at Bush over Iraq, after being right there on the same page with him prior to the invasion.


Democrats before Iraq War started.... - YouTube

Then a Democrat executes the withdrawal that was arranged for and scheduled by W Bush, and Democrats take all the credit for 'bringing our troops home.' Nice.

You know, it's one thing to play partisan politics over green jobs or other pork, but when people play partisan games over war policy, that is really loathesome.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-26-2012, 12:41 PM
 
Location: London UK & Florida USA
7,923 posts, read 8,847,521 times
Reputation: 2059
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
One would really have to work to get any more b*****-ackwards than that. Democrats did nothing but scream at Bush over Iraq, after being right there on the same page with him prior to the invasion.
mmmmmmmmmmmm...... Obama has always said that Afghanistan and Pakistan were our problems not Iraq......Obama was not in the Senate at the time of the vote but opposed the war from the start
Oct. 2. 2002 Illinois state Sen. Barack Obama gives speech opposing the war in Iraq. He said he did not oppose "all wars," but he opposed "dumb wars," and wanted to finish the job against al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden rather than start a new war in Iraq. He predicted that "even a successful war against Iraq will require a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences."

Democrats before Iraq War started.... - YouTube

Then a Democrat executes the withdrawal that was arranged for and scheduled by W Bush, and Democrats take all the credit for 'bringing our troops home.' Nice.
The only reason Bush laid out a withdrawal plan was because he could not get his $87billion bill to fund the war passed and Obama insisted that Congress should hold the funding until George Bush presented a plan for withdrawal and also funds for investment in American schools and infrastructure at least comparable to what the US wanted to spend in Iraq.

You know, it's one thing to play partisan politics over green jobs or other pork, but when people play partisan games over war policy, that is really loathesome.
Bush didn't really have a war policy...... he didn't even have a withdrawal strategy. This war in Iraq was not needed, not wanted and not succesful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2012, 12:46 PM
 
1,378 posts, read 1,392,427 times
Reputation: 1141
4 reasons I support Obama.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2012, 01:24 PM
 
Location: London UK & Florida USA
7,923 posts, read 8,847,521 times
Reputation: 2059
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllenSJC View Post
4 reasons I support Obama.
Ha Ha Ha Ha......... soooooooo true
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2012, 02:02 PM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,707,823 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by geeoro View Post
The Republicans have done nothing but criticize Obama for withdrawing our troops from Iraq and they will criticize him again when he gets our guys out of Afghanisan........... Bush got our guys killed for no reason (except oil and to revenge his dad's failure to get Saddam) and now Our President is bringing our troops home...........
Obama is not bringing our troops home, he's sending a whole lot of them to Afghanistan and whether or not one supports this war, you cannot possibly agree with him putting these guys in harms way and then taking the side of the Islamic fanatics who are killing them.

If Obama does not support the military which he clearly does not, ALL our guys need to be brought home immediately. He's trying his darndest to get them killed now by making apologies for them, implying the Islamic fanatics should kill them over what two soldiers did.

Obama is making it very clear that Islamics have the right to desecrate and burn our Flag, they can burn Bibles to their little hearts' content, they can kill our soldiers but their hate-speech book can not be touched. No freedom of speech issue there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2012, 02:03 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,392,645 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post

If Obama does not support the military which he clearly does not,
Which is why he has increased military spending every year in office? Right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2012, 02:53 PM
 
1,724 posts, read 1,471,661 times
Reputation: 780
Quote:
Originally Posted by geeoro
mmmmmmmmmmmm...... Obama has always said that Afghanistan and Pakistan were our problems not Iraq......Obama was not in the Senate at the time of the vote but opposed the war from the start
Oct. 2. 2002 Illinois state Sen. Barack Obama gives speech opposing the war in Iraq. He said he did not oppose "all wars," but he opposed "dumb wars," and wanted to finish the job against al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden rather than start a new war in Iraq. He predicted that "even a successful war against Iraq will require a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences."
You ignore the fact that Obama voted to continue the Iraq War numerous time under Bush. He voted for over $300 billion dollars to fuel the Iraq War as he entered the Senate in 2005. Lets not forget that the Obama administration fought to prolong the occupation past the deadline set under the Bush administration. For more evidence that the administration actually wanted to extend the troop presence in Iraq, despite today's words by Obama and McDonough, one only has to look at the statements of Defense Secretary Leon Panetta.


In July, Panetta urged Iraqi leaders to, "Dammit, make a decision" about the U.S. troop extension. In August, he told reporters that, "My view is that they finally did say, ‘Yes.'" On Oct. 17, he was still pushing (http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/national-security/panetta-hopeful-of-striking-deal-with-iraq-to-keep-us-troops-there-as-trainers-after-2011/2011/10/17/gIQA4vIFsL_story.html - broken link) for the extension and said, "At the present time I'm not discouraged because we're still in negotiations with the Iraqis."
How the Obama administration bungled the Iraq withdrawal negotiations | The Cable


Lets not not also forget the fact that Obama is planning to keep thousands of mercs over in Iraq.

But the fact is America’s military efforts in Iraq aren’t coming to an end. They are instead entering a new phase. On January 1, 2012, the State Department will command a hired army of about 5,500 security contractors, all to protect the largest U.S. diplomatic presence anywhere overseas.
The Iraq War Ain't Over, No Matter What Obama Says | Danger Room | Wired.com

Last edited by A Common Anomaly; 02-26-2012 at 03:26 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2012, 02:56 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,468,904 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by noexcuseforignorance View Post
Perhaps you can grow a set and define why that's horse manure or are you just basing your opinion on your emotions?

You do have a very valid point about the 10 things though.
She/he was right to call the U.S. the Titanic.

All the rest of it is complete garbage and are Obama's talking points to the tee.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2012, 03:06 PM
 
29,939 posts, read 39,468,904 times
Reputation: 4799
Quote:
Originally Posted by geeoro View Post
There are only eight reasons as the camera cut off the last two.......... Duhhhh!
The poster has an ending sentence that says "I voted for him before blah blah blah blah."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2012, 03:10 PM
 
Location: London UK & Florida USA
7,923 posts, read 8,847,521 times
Reputation: 2059
Bottom line here........... action talks and B/S walks..............
Obama IS bringing our troops home!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:12 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top