Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A serious question to birthers: Why is it so important to you to discredit this particular president? Never before has there been this many conspiracy theories related to a president, let alone as to his origins. So why now? Why do you demand more proof than has ever been demanded of any other?
A serious question to birthers: Why is it so important to you to discredit this particular president? Never before has there been this many conspiracy theories related to a president, let alone as to his origins. So why now? Why do you demand more proof than has ever been demanded of any other?
No, I do not think about it at all. I am sick beyond words of this topic. I don't even care if it is a forgery, which I doubt. The bottom line is that President Obama has dedicated his life to the American people, despite their protests and undermining, and continues to do what is good for us. Unlike the pandering GOP, he continues to stand up to wrongs perpetrated upon us, holds to the convictions that ALL Americans deserve leadership to their highest and best attainable good, and represents the US (us) in global affairs that the GOP doesn't even bother to inform themselves about.
He could be from Mars and I would still support his work. When the GOP comes up with someone that demonstrates the same initiative, competence, integrity, and character, I will consider supporting her too.
That is the most sickening post I've read on this forum! The Candy Man has a spell on you.
The forgery is so bad any computer geek can see it's a phony.
actually the computer geek blogs are in agreement that there is no evidence of forgery.
claud, the LFBC was made available at a press conference that included a representative from WND before a pdf copy was made available online. at that press conference the LFBC was and photographed. the PDF's resolution is lower than the one photographed so we know the PDF can not be the source document for the photographed copy.
for your theory to be correct claud requires that the WH had a perfectly acceptable certified copy of the LFBC ready for scanning but instead decided to also make a "so bad" version....... for sh*ts-n-giggles.
flights from africa would go through europe then enter the US at new york or chicago. there were no flights originating in africa in 1961 that entered the US via honolulu. corsi was looking in the wrong place.
again, direct quote please.
nope. sara obama said he was born in hawaii, repeatedly.
“Officers of the Hawaii Department of Health and various elected Hawaiian public officials may have intentionally obscured 1961 birth records and procedures to avoid having to release to public inspection and to the examination of court-authorized forensic examiners any original Obama 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health may or may not have,” Zullo said.
The investigators say the evidence contained in the computer-generated PDF file released by the White House as well as important deficiencies in the Hawaii process of certifying the long-form birth certificate establish probable cause that a forgery has been committed.
Also, records of Immigration and Naturalization Service cards filled out by passengers arriving on international flights originating outside the United States in the month of August 1961, examined at the National Archives in Washington, D.C., are missing records for the week of President Obama’s birth.
claud, the card was released under a FOIA request in 2008. again, how do you figure obama is responsible for something that happened during the bush administration?
actually the computer geek blogs are in agreement that there is no evidence of forgery.
claud, the LFBC was made available at a press conference that included a representative from WND before a pdf copy was made available online. at that press conference the LFBC was and photographed. the PDF's resolution is lower than the one photographed so we know the PDF can not be the source document for the photographed copy.
for your theory to be correct claud requires that the WH had a perfectly acceptable certified copy of the LFBC ready for scanning but instead decided to also make a "so bad" version....... for sh*ts-n-giggles.
Barry can put this to bed tomorrow by doing what Arpaio suggests.
“As I said at the beginning of the investigation, the president can put all this to rest quite easily,” Arpaio said. “All he has to do is demand the Hawaii Department of Health release to the American public and to a panel of certified court-authorized forensic examiners all original 1961 paper, microfilm and computer birth records the Hawaii Department of Health has in its possession.”
Arpaio emphasized that the Hawaii Department of Health needs to provide, as part of the full disclosure, evidence regarding the chain of custody of all Obama birth records, including paper, microfilm and electronic records to eliminate the possibility that a forger or forgers may have tampered with the birth records.
The sheriff said the president should also authorize Honolulu’s Kapi’olani Hospital, the birth hospital listed on the Obama long-form birth certificate, to release any hospital patient records for Stanley Ann Dunham Obama, his mother, and for the newly born Barack Obama, to provide corroboration for the records held in the Hawaii Department of Health vault.
“Absent the authentic Hawaii Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other credible proof supporting the idea or belief that President Barack Obama was born in Hawaii, as he and the White House have consistently asserted,” Zullo said.
Demand it!!! then we can all move on.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.