Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
judge malihi heard the evidence, made his decision based on that evidence ( would you like to see that decision claud?) then he sent that decision to SOS brian kemp who concurred with malihi's decision.
They sat on some boards together. Have you ever sat on a board? They meet infrequently, and the board members often don't socialize with the others except at the board meeting where they just want to quickly address business, resolve issues, and get the meeting over with so that they can get out of there.
I haven't offered up any lame excuses regarding layers and groups on the birth certificate. I don't have the expertise to comment on computer software, and it's irrelevant, anyway. Because, as I've pointed out over and over again, a birth certificate is simply a piece of paper that says the state will affirm the information printed on it. The State of Hawaii has publicly and repeatedly affirmed the information on the birth certificate that's been posted on the internet. As long as Hawaii affirms that information, the birth certificate itself is irrelevant. And any copies, internet of otherwise, are equally irrelevant.
Please provide the quotes of their affirmations, I think you are in for a surprise.
While you're at it, provide confirmation from Kapiolani that he was born in that hospital.
He didn't win those cases, they got tossed out, never litigated, pretend the issue isn't germaine. We need one court of law to put all the evidence on the table, the only way to do that is to get to the point of "discovery". Then, we wiin!
...Yes, because Georgia most certainly didn't happen.
You use the same program they used to create this forgery, I forget what it was.
to try and create a forgery of that nature in AI would require an astronomical amount of man hours...... unnecessarily. AI is primarily a layout program, it does not do photo manipulation. that's photoshop's job.
What legitimate court rules in favor of a defendant that fails to show up and present a defense? It's generally called winning by DEFAULT! He showed his contempt for the judicial system.
Regardless of the outcome in Georgia, it appears that Obama has openly shown his disregard for the laws of that state. According to Irion, Obama has also "decided that he is above the Courts, the law, and the Constitution. He has just indicated...that he is not subject to their authority. This is the true story from today, yet almost no one will report it."
Obama has deliberately turned his back, and walked on by.
And most of the media has followed along right behind him.
judge malihi heard the evidence, made his decision based on that evidence ( would you like to see that decision claud?) then he sent that decision to SOS brian kemp who concurred with malihi's decision.
Yes indeed after Jablonsky threatened each of them.
You don't open it as a pdf, that is your first mistake.
the file is saved as a PDF. when opened either directly as a PDF in AI of as an AI file the results are the same. we see multiple groups under layer 1. this is true for both the LFBC and the national revue example.
What legitimate court rules in favor of a defendant that fails to show up and present a defense? It's generally called winning by DEFAULT! He showed his contempt for the judicial system.
Which shows a lack of comprehension of what actually happened.
The judge WANTED to give them a win by default. In fact, he INSISTED upon it. HOwever, Orly and her gang of idiots wanted to take it to court and have the judge decide on the merits of the evidence.
The mere fact that Orly's idiots LOST the case on the merits of the evidence to an empty defense bench speaks LEAGUES on the "merits" of said evidence.
As in, there are none.
As in, birthers are frothing idiots who love to waste government money.
And come up with stupid, inane conspiracies liek 'FOMG THE GOVERNMENT PRESSURED THE JUDGE! THAT'S WHY WE DIDN'T WIN! BAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!"
What legitimate court rules in favor of a defendant that fails to show up and present a defense?
one that understands the burden of proof falls on the accuser.
they did not meet that burden, no defense was needed. ( law 101 )
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
