Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That's funny, I thought this was a thread about "pro-life or pro-death"?
You're free to discuss which one you are.
How seriously are we suppose to take pro lifers when at the same time they are up the white houses buttocks to get rid of health care for those with pre existing conditions?
Another lie from the left. NO ONE is advocating "getting rid of health care" for anyone. However,feel free to drink the liberal kool-aid though instead of analyzing facts
Another lie from the left. NO ONE is advocating "getting rid of health care" for anyone. However,feel free to drink the liberal kool-aid though instead of analyzing facts
Conservatives don't say so, but, by their actions, they absolutely do. We can either a) provide health care to every American, or b) some of those 10's of millions without health insurance will die. And, Yes, it really is as simple as that. Therefore, if you are truly "pro-life," you must be horrified that millions of people are being denied health care because the government has failed to extend Medicare coverage to them.
Thank you for clarifying that this was your opinion. I was beginning to worry that i had missed some important document of law!
So we have a difference of opinion. I do not think that there should be universal/free healthcare - and I am also not alone in my opinion.
So, if a couple can't afford health insurance and have no money to pay for healthcare out of pocket......we should let their baby die once it is born if it needs life saving medical intervention.
There is no specific date when the erosion ofmorals began in America - so no I will not give you an arbitrary date - you can feel free to make up whatever year you want if it helps you.
Just because there has always been immorality in the world does not mean it should be accepted.
As for the rest of your post that you wish me to 'address", I am not going to address a diatribe full of lies and ridiculous accusations that have nothing to do with what I think about this topic. You can continue to pull junk from your imagination and try to project it on to me - but none of it is so. I do not hate women - and you saying it a thousand times will not make it true. Your credibility will just keep going deeper down a bottomless pit - but I suppose you don't care.
Note the from black bold to red bold FLIP FLOP.
Ya know , sometimes you can argue yourself into a corner....
And you can accept the FACT that immorality has been around since the beginning of humans or pretend it began in America.....
When did the erosion of morals begin in America? 20,000 BC? 100AD? 1800 AD? Surely you, being an astute student of history, can narrow down a time frame.
But if as YOU have stated it's always been around can you define "always"....????
Trollen trollen trollen, keep those threads a trollen.
Being for choice doesn't mean pro-death. False dichotomy with the association fallacy and demonization.
Failure at so many levels.
Abortion always stops the beating heart of a human fetus who has committed no crime or sin and cannot speak for itself to express his/her choice other than to physically attempt to move away from the probe used to abort it. That indeed would seem to be pro-death in the face of the survival instinct of the human life about to be snuffed out.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.