Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Is it justice people seek or are they looking and even hoping for signs of white racism so they can exploit it?
The answer is rather obvious.
Quote:
At first glance, the death of Trayvon Martin seemed to be a straightforward example of ugly, racial conflict resulting in the killing of an innocent black teenager by a white man, George Zimmerman. But now, as evidence continues to come forward, the facts seem much more complicated and the "obvious truth" premature.
Extremists on both sides have exploited the issue. Black Panther idiots are using this as a recruiting tool, and White nationalists are using this also.
Me personally, I don't think race was involved, I think Martin killed the kid and got off because his father is a judge.
You always come up with some of the strangest things.
If you are in public on a public street I can follow you anywhere. There are no laws against just following someone.
There's a fine line between following and stalking. Zimmerman crossed the line.
It has to do with intent, but that is just common sense.
Stalking Resource Center -- National Center for Victims of Crime - Criminal Stalking Laws by State/Washington (http://www.ncvc.org/src/main.aspx?dbID=DB_Washington718 - broken link)
There's a fine line between following and stalking. Zimmerman crossed the line.
It has to do with intent, but that is just common sense.
Stalking Resource Center -- National Center for Victims of Crime - Criminal Stalking Laws by State/Washington (http://www.ncvc.org/src/main.aspx?dbID=DB_Washington718 - broken link)
Apparently it's only stalking if a '78 Camaro is involved.
I haven't read the thread in its entirety ( don't know if I spelled that right) so I don't know if anyone has bought this up. But if I'm not mistaken wasn't Trayvon shot in the back of the head? I have'nt heard much of this but according to Zimmerman he shot because he was being attacked, but if he shot Trayvon in the back of the head it means that Trayvon was walking or running away thus no longer being a direct threat to Zimmerman, therefore excessive force would not have been necessary.
I haven't read the thread in its entirety ( don't know if I spelled that right) so I don't know if anyone has bought this up. But if I'm not mistaken wasn't Trayvon shot in the back of the head? I have'nt heard much of this but according to Zimmerman he shot because he was being attacked, but if he shot Trayvon in the back of the head it means that Trayvon was walking or running away thus no longer being a direct threat to Zimmerman, therefore excessive force would not have been necessary.
No, he was shot in the chest. No info about trajectory has been released, at least not that I've seen.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Is it justice people seek or are they looking and even hoping for signs of white racism so they can exploit it?
