Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You people pull this every election year it is old and tiring.
You do know that the entire story goes back to Roe v. Wade and most of our leaners have no idea what Roe's real name is or much of the whole story about her. I have been doing some very interesting reading about Akin's words and Roe v. Wade this afternoon that has made me more against the court case than I was before.
All the more reason why the baby should receive medical care.
Do us all a favor and at least attempt to learn about medical ethics, especially as they relate to unnecessary and potentially damaging interventions on pre-viable or fatally compromised newborns.
You'll be the same one on here complaining about people on welfare and WIC after you force them to have a baby they can't afford to take care of.
I have no problem with anyone receiving welfare as long as they are actively taking steps that will allow them to no longer have to do so and be able to be able to support themselves and their families. I am opposed to welfare abuse - not welfare itself.
I also believe that the federal government should leave most of those programs to the states and/or the people - per the tenth amendment.
Besides - we aren't talking about a child that is still in the womb - we are discussing a live birth.
How much of the Roe v. Wade story is true? I know many here who have no idea but you won't ever find out either.
the story is what 40 plus years old? I don't remember the details and could care less what norma "now" claims is true and what wasn't true back then. the law was based on her as "any woman" and her rights to privacy in her health care. a woman's health and how she takes care of it is no one's business but the individual woman's, which is now law.
Maybe you should read some of the stories from women who have had to have late-term abortions, or look up some of the complications that necessitate late-term abortion. To say that very few, if any are because of medical complications is woefully ignorant.
Did Jane Roe have an abortiion? If so, why does she say the opposite?
Did Jane Roe have an abortiion? If so, why does she say the opposite?
who cares?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
