Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-17-2012, 08:32 PM
 
Location: Montgomery Village
4,112 posts, read 4,473,842 times
Reputation: 1712

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiddlehead View Post
Let's say you bought a house, like it did, in early 2003.

I spent a year looking, and thought I did the best I could at the time, I've never missed a payment, even when my wife was out of work for years ast a stay at home mom. The value nearly doubled by 2006, and I was a genius in my wife's eyes. Now, we are underwater on the house, and I am the fool that is to blame for wasting our savings. Suppose, my wife wanted to get a divorce for my financial incompetence.

Would she have a case, or are macroeconomic factors to blame?

Discuss.

(Hint. This is not a real estate thread.)
It is only your fault if you are trying to walk away. Otherwise, if you can pay for the house then, stay in the house. Housing shouldn't have been looked at as money making scheme. Of course if you took out loans against your house then it is your fault.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-17-2012, 08:51 PM
 
Location: OCEAN BREEZES AND VIEWS SAN CLEMENTE
19,893 posts, read 18,440,811 times
Reputation: 6465
I was a realtor for 15 yrs, working with some good and some bad realtors. The loan agents are another story, could not stand some of them.

Value only matters, if you need to sell the home you are currently in. If you do not need to, let the home price adjust then decide what you wish to do.

If your under water on your home, you can always do a short sale with the bank, but suggest you get a realtor who specializes in short sale properties.

A lot of banks are willing to work with underwater owners. Will refinancing the home help in anyway.

No home prices thruout time and does not matter which party is in office, have declines, and values do rise, but in some areas, those hard hit with short-sales, bank repos, and foreclosures suffer immensely.

In areas hard hit by this recession, because we are in a recession, no matter what others call it, will take around 4 to 5 yrs, to recover.

I would not come down hard on yourself, when people buy a home, they can never specualte what the future will bring, but a good word of advice. If you cannot afford to buy the home of your dream, don't buy it. If you cannot afford the payments on that dream home, and yet buy the basics to live by, don't buy that house.

It is only your falult if at the time of your purchase of the said property, you had trouble making the payments back when, and trouble saving for that rainy day, which believe you me, can happen i know at anytime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2012, 08:58 PM
 
25,842 posts, read 16,522,667 times
Reputation: 16025
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiddlehead View Post
Let's say you bought a house, like it did, in early 2003.

I spent a year looking, and thought I did the best I could at the time, I've never missed a payment, even when my wife was out of work for years ast a stay at home mom. The value nearly doubled by 2006, and I was a genius in my wife's eyes. Now, we are underwater on the house, and I am the fool that is to blame for wasting our savings. Suppose, my wife wanted to get a divorce for my financial incompetence.

Would she have a case, or are macroeconomic factors to blame?

Discuss.

(Hint. This is not a real estate thread.)
I would say that if you didn't refinance it that it's not your fault. If you boosted your mortgage up during the bubble it's your fault.

But no, you couldn't foresee what was going to happen with the market. People need houses, that's just the way it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2012, 09:00 PM
 
Location: Texas
44,254 posts, read 64,351,440 times
Reputation: 73932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiddlehead View Post
I did not borrow anything "on the house." It is simply worth $50k less than I paid in 2003, according to zillow.

My point was say I was hammered by the bubble and housing crash. Is my wife right in saying it was incompetence or mismanagement on my part that caused that $50k to disappear?
You are only under water if you owe more than it's worth.
Most of the time you see that, it's because there wasn't an adequate down payment.
Or any efforts towards building equity outside of normal payments (most of which, at 2003 rate) are being put towards interest.

A loss of 50k during a bust does not make anyone immediately at fault or underwater.
But you're saying you haven't made any headway in equity in 10 years?

And btw, who cares unless you're trying to sell it right this very second?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2012, 09:02 PM
 
Location: Maryland
629 posts, read 946,123 times
Reputation: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiddlehead View Post
Let's say you bought a house, like it did, in early 2003.

I spent a year looking, and thought I did the best I could at the time, I've never missed a payment, even when my wife was out of work for years ast a stay at home mom. The value nearly doubled by 2006, and I was a genius in my wife's eyes. Now, we are underwater on the house, and I am the fool that is to blame for wasting our savings. Suppose, my wife wanted to get a divorce for my financial incompetence.

Would she have a case, or are macroeconomic factors to blame?

Discuss.

(Hint. This is not a real estate thread.)
I recommend marriage counseling.

Are you trapped by being underwater, i.e. do you need to move for job or personal reasons (aside from this hypothetical divorce) and cannot sell the house? Are the payments affordable?

If you bought a house in 2003 and put 20% down you should not be underwater now. I guess she might complain about that, but the fact is housing was and is expensive and where are you going to live? The other option is renting and there are often limitations to a rental. Did you take advantage of owning in this way?

You can get a no-fault divorce but making reasonable financial decisions with the information you had at the time is not grounds for an at-fault divorce. Impotence, incarceration, adultery, abandonment, etc. would be grounds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2012, 09:03 PM
 
Location: Texas
44,254 posts, read 64,351,440 times
Reputation: 73932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldhag1 View Post
Zillow had the house we just sold estimated at almost $200,000 less than we ended up selling it for, so I wouldn't put too much in stock by them. .
Zillow is totally worthless.
They are hundreds of thousands of dollars off all the time.
I don't even see why they bother to have a website.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2012, 09:04 PM
 
78,373 posts, read 60,566,039 times
Reputation: 49651
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiddlehead View Post
Let's say you bought a house, like it did, in early 2003.

I spent a year looking, and thought I did the best I could at the time, I've never missed a payment, even when my wife was out of work for years ast a stay at home mom. The value nearly doubled by 2006, and I was a genius in my wife's eyes. Now, we are underwater on the house, and I am the fool that is to blame for wasting our savings. Suppose, my wife wanted to get a divorce for my financial incompetence.

Would she have a case, or are macroeconomic factors to blame?

Discuss.

(Hint. This is not a real estate thread.)
So, your wife thinks it is an investment?

Might just want to ask her if it has shrunk or if it no longer has a roof etc.

Basically, you signed on to make a certain series of payments.....you got the house still.....there you go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2012, 09:05 PM
 
Location: Maryland
629 posts, read 946,123 times
Reputation: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Why would you buy at the top of a bubble? People try not to buy stocks when the prices are high. Same applies to any other asset, like one's house.
2003 wasn't the top of the bubble. It was on the upward slope but around here houses are fetching close to 2003 prices. We refinanced in 2003 but only for 70% of house assessed value--we were lucky our credit union was so conservative as to not allow more than that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2012, 09:08 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,159,948 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiddlehead View Post
Let's say you bought a house, like it did, in early 2003.

I spent a year looking, and thought I did the best I could at the time, I've never missed a payment, even when my wife was out of work for years ast a stay at home mom. The value nearly doubled by 2006, and I was a genius in my wife's eyes. Now, we are underwater on the house, and I am the fool that is to blame for wasting our savings. Suppose, my wife wanted to get a divorce for my financial incompetence.

Would she have a case, or are macroeconomic factors to blame?
What advice did your account and real estate attorney give you prior to buying the house?

You did consult with an accountant and a real estate attorney before you bought the house, right?

You couldn't afford the $75 to $150 consultation with a real estate attorney? Then why were you even looking at houses? Independent unbiased advice is exactly that.

As far as her divorce claim, your competence level was imputed knowledge, known in advance or reasonably foreseeable, and in any case, not grounds for divorce-for-cause. If she wants to jump ship, she can, but there's a price to pay: no alimony, no child-support and she leaves the marriage with only that which she entered.

C-D Divorce Court....You have my ruling...

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2012, 09:09 PM
 
Location: Texas
44,254 posts, read 64,351,440 times
Reputation: 73932
You should divorce your wife for being so financially artarded that she thinks her home is an 'investment.'
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top