Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-26-2012, 09:38 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
14,361 posts, read 9,804,315 times
Reputation: 6663

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trimac20 View Post
America has done enough trying to play the good guy and liberating countries from tyrants. Let their own people rise up. Indeed, a lot of America's do-good actions in the 80s actually supported tyrannical dictators in the first place/put them there.

America should just stay out of it. If the majority of Iranians don't want to live under a theocracy anymore they will stand up. As cold as it sounds they made their bed with the Iranian Revolution with the Ayatollah. Of course I do feel for those Iranians who don't fit into that fundamentalist mould, and I do hope they change, but that it comes from within, not some US-imposed system band-aid of 'democracy' like in Iraq.
Believe it or not, people look to us for help in overthrowing regimes. EXP: Iranian students rose up and fully expected the west to intervene. We did nothing and they were crushed.

The CO of one of my client companies is a Bahai Iranian. First, the Persians (the people themselves) are all pro-western. Second, the human rights situation is horrible, and they desperately need all the help they can get. The thing about Iran is they were fooled into hating the west and embracing the Mullahs. Much of the country now hate the Mullahs and see their corruption is far worse than that of the Shah. They didn't know what they had until they lost it.

You say "mind our own business"

I say "ignorance is no solution"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-26-2012, 09:56 AM
 
Location: Vermont
11,762 posts, read 14,677,165 times
Reputation: 18539
Quote:
Originally Posted by Repubocrat View Post
OMG! Have you ever been outside of the USA? In Germany, people are usually free to express themselves without having to worry about being PC or hurting a particular group.

Chancellor Angela Merkel said a couple years ago "German multiculturalism has utterly failed in Germany"- Can you imagine Barrack Obama saying the same in the "Land of the Free"?

Usually in Germany and other European countries, people don't lose their jobs for saying something that is not considered PC! Hell, I have German friends who openly say "I don't like Turkish people"

If anybody in the USA would say something like "I don't like Blacks" or "I don't like Hispanics" at the workplace- it does not matter how honest and truthful it is, this person would automatically lose his/her job

As you can see, this freedom of expression we have here is nothing but BS- you have the freedom to express yourself as long as you don't say anything deemed "offensive" by any group, race or ethnic group.
I'm afraid you are very, very confused.

In most countries, including Germany, expression of certain political or religious views is prohibited by law and subject to prosecution.

In the United States these expressions are protected by law, and organizations like the ACLU exist in large part to protect the right of people to say unpopular and offensive things.

If you're asking for freedom from any untoward social consequences for expressing views that other people don't like you'll never find that, here or anywhere else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 10:13 AM
 
11,185 posts, read 6,520,163 times
Reputation: 4627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trimac20 View Post
America has done enough trying to play the good guy and liberating countries from tyrants. Let their own people rise up. Indeed, a lot of America's do-good actions in the 80s actually supported tyrannical dictators in the first place/put them there.

America should just stay out of it. If the majority of Iranians don't want to live under a theocracy anymore they will stand up. As cold as it sounds they made their bed with the Iranian Revolution with the Ayatollah. Of course I do feel for those Iranians who don't fit into that fundamentalist mould, and I do hope they change, but that it comes from within, not some US-imposed system band-aid of 'democracy' like in Iraq.
What's with this forcing, liberating countries that don't have free speech ? War or nothing are the onle options ?

Last year Obama ordered gov't. agencies overseas to combat the criminalization of LGBTstatus and conduct, to enhance efforts to protect vulnerable LGBT refugees and asylum seekers, to ensure that our foreign assistance promotes the protection of LGBT rights, to enlist international organizations in the fight against discrimination. We talk the talk for international women's rights, disregarding religious or cultural values as a reason for honor killings, widow burning, or female genital mutilation.

Since the U.S. won't be minding its own business and will along with other countries choose sides, I'll lean to the freedom of speech side.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 10:16 AM
 
2,920 posts, read 2,801,813 times
Reputation: 624
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tilt11 View Post
Barack said today that "we" accept that. I strongly disagree and think that statement was foolish.

I am not saying we are to wage war on those that don't have freedom of speech but we should reject not accept it. All Americans should be aware how powerful and essential the fundamental right to say what you want is. We should look down on those who don't accept that. It is a form of tryanny.

I do not know how you can be an American and enjoy and understand the freedom we have and think that the rest of the world should not have these same rights. They are basic human rights everyone should have.
I accept the fact that some people or nations do not believe in gravitation and solarcentric model of the Solar system. I accept the fact that some people do not believe in personal hygiene and good manners.
Does it mean I have to adapt and stop taking showers to fit in?

As much as the US have to accept that other people and entire nations do not believe in free speech, they have to accept that fact that we do. We can't however demand that other nations and cultures simply adopt our standards

On the other hand there is no absolute freedom of speech anywhere in the world. The Supreme Court had ruled on what types of speech do not get this protection hence the freedom of speech is limited and not absolute.
I think the difference between the US and other countries is the extend to which we allow the freedom of speech. Some countries go further, some don't. Even in England, bastion of democracy and human rights, making a porn flick with an actrees dressed and looking like the queen would not go easily. In the US posting the President's private cell number on a public website could be construed as a federal offense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 10:35 AM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,258,959 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Do you accept the fact that North Korea does not have freedom of speech?

You should, because it is a fact.

Now, do you "approve" the North Korean laws?

You should not.


See the difference?
That should be easy enough to understand...YOU'D THINK!

I've never been so arrogant as to suggest that the whole world has to have the same concept of "freedoms" as we have. Americans can't seem to figure out why we're always mired in international bullsh*t time and time again. A lot of it is our desire to tell others how to live and think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 10:48 AM
 
Location: West Egg
2,160 posts, read 1,958,597 times
Reputation: 1297
Let me point out that, despite the lies of the OP, President Obama said no such thing. Here is what he said:

Quote:
I know that not all countries in this body share this particular understanding of the protection of free speech. We recognize that. But in 2012, at a time when anyone with a cell phone can spread offensive views around the world with the click of a button, the notion that we can control the flow of information is obsolete.
Transcript: Obama address to U.N. General Assembly | Fox News

President Obama simply noted the demonstrable fact that not all nations support free speech as does the United States (duh, you'd think conservative could restrain their knee-jerk denials of this, but since Obama said it, they just can't -- so pathological is their blind rage). He noted that the West understands that. You'd think understanding the nature of those that oppose Western freedoms would be considered a good think by conservatives, but not in the We-Hate-Everything-Obama-Says lala land. Then he clearly states that control of free speech, as some in the Muslim world would like, is not even possible. I'm sure some moron will find a reason to object to that, too.

Plenty of useful idiots flocked to this thread, drooling with their usual hatred and moronically assuming that the lies of the OP were true. All I can do is advise such clowns to get a clue, or you'll just keep losing elections like you're going to lose this one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 10:51 AM
 
Location: West Virginia
16,722 posts, read 15,720,104 times
Reputation: 10945
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
Got anything but your opinion or wackaloon links?
You know, something credible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
Creditable? al Times of New York? Media Matters? Daily Kos? It would be nice to know what you consider creditable so people know who to quote.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FancyFeast5000 View Post
Do you mean creditable or credible?
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
That would be the word the poster I was answering used. Keep on with the deflection.
FancyFeast did nothing to create deflection, roysoldboy. You are the one here that has failed to answer the simple question chielgirl asked, in spite of your poor grammar or spelling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 11:40 AM
 
3,345 posts, read 3,079,289 times
Reputation: 1725
Quote:
Originally Posted by mensaguy View Post
FancyFeast did nothing to create deflection, roysoldboy. You are the one here that has failed to answer the simple question chielgirl asked, in spite of your poor grammar or spelling.
Actually she did deflect there kid.... she failed to answer a question that was posed to her..... probably because she had no answer

The left is famous on here for saying links are not credible because they personally disagree with them

Let me guess what you would think is credible..... NY Times., Newsweek, NBC, ......High Times
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2012, 12:28 PM
 
Location: Texas State Fair
8,560 posts, read 11,227,069 times
Reputation: 4258
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tilt11 View Post
Barack said today that "we" accept that. I strongly disagree and think that statement was foolish.
Spoiler


I am not saying we are to wage war on those that don't have freedom of speech but we should reject not accept it. All Americans should be aware how powerful and essential the fundamental right to say what you want is. We should look down on those who don't accept that. It is a form of tryanny.

I do not know how you can be an American and enjoy and understand the freedom we have and think that the rest of the world should not have these same rights.
They are basic human rights everyone should have.
I understand and accept that some cultures do not endorse or practice freedom of speech. Such condition is of a basic reality.

But under no circumstances or condition does that influence my own practice of freedom of speech or endorsement of attempts to spread that freedom to others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top