Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
first of all, this was only one small part of this cover up, and its just another unnamed source.
Secondly, when one reporter has their unnamed sources saying something you don't like, you call them liars. Then another reporter has their unnamed sources that say what you like, and suddenly it's game over, and every other reporter is wrong.
No, and you are not likely to hear anything about this until the white house is certain that non of the CIA operations will be compromised. You don't need to know every CIA operation that the U.S. is undertaking. Get over it. Quit watching trash t.v.
Pardon me, but your hatred is showing. Shall we provide some lying stories from your favorite media?
I'm sure it would be quite long(er); we could even dissect them to point out the lies (necessary, because the left doesn't see.)
My favorite media? I don't have a favorite media. Lets stick with Faux news? That is what the thread is about. Hate Faux news? That would be illogical. Faux News is a Corporation. It has no feelings. Faux's goals are making money and in that respect they have succeeded. They create the fiction that they are news organization but they are nothing more than an entertainment channel. It is a great marketing plan and has worked out well for them.
I feel sorry for the many people that are duped into thinking they are watching a News Organization or are seeing quality news. Faux is to news reporting what Pro Wrestling is to Professional Sports.
Someone has to cover the president's ass, cuz the president sure as hell isn't able to do it.
It says something about a president who refuses to come clean and tell us what happened, so we have to sift thru the truth with unnamed source leakers, testimony from congressional hearings, and reporters who find diaries laying around in the consulate, days after the attack, and another reporter finding documents laying on the consulate floor one and a half months later.
Here is what that the Pentagon and the CIA are saying. Fox is lying. Satisfied. No, of course not.
At the risk of being juvenile, For all of those Fox Zombies, Let me be the first to say...I TOLD YOU SO. It is not too late to block Faux News from your T.V. Box and take it off of your favorites list...just saying. Nobody will know that you used to watch it.
If you think Thinkprogrees is too biased, they have links in the article that you can click.
based on reports people have seen and heard on Fox News, talk radio and elsewhere, People are positive that officials watched a live video feed in the White House situation room from an overhead drone as the attack in Benghazi unfolded. He knows that a U.S. Special Operations team was available in Sicily to help rescue the besieged Americans, but wasn't sent. He is sure that President Obama or his aides refused requests to dispatch an AC-130 Spectre gunship that could have mowed down the attackers with its fearsome rotating cannons.
"The bottom line," they believe, "is that [Obama] had the ability to save those four Americans and didn't do it."
Officials in the Pentagon and the intelligence community contend that none of those assertions are true.
In an extraordinary effort to refute them, senior intelligence officials released a detailed timeline Thursday of CIA actions in Benghazi, after trying for weeks to keep the extent of the CIA's presence there a secret. Pentagon officials, meanwhile, disclosed details about military forces they set in motion after learning of the attack
so do you expect the military and CIA to issue something saying their commander is lying? Or do you think they will follow commands from their superior officers? Wasn't it reported just a few weeks ago that a soldier was being persecuted in the military for criticizing Obama on facebook, and you expect senior officials to put their careers at risk for not reporting what they are told on Benghazi?
so do you expect the military and CIA to issue something saying their commander is lying? Or do you think they will follow commands from their superior officers? Wasn't it reported just a few weeks ago that a soldier was being persecuted in the military for criticizing Obama on facebook, and you expect senior officials to put their careers at risk for not reporting what they are told on Benghazi?
The CIA officers are career federal employees. They don't come and go with each administration. The argument you are making is that all respectable media outlets are wrong, the CIA is wrong, the pentagon is wrong, and common sense is wrong. The only group that is right is fox news. Fox news is a liar. The question is who do you trust Fox News or everyone else. When ever they come on the air every day they lie. Everyone knows that they are not fair and balanced it is a lie from the start. They are conservative propaganda tabloid trash.
Don't believe me. Listen to some of their former employees.
Anything is possible now. Obama is clearly playing catch me if you can. Don't think a disappearing act has not been carefully mapped out.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
