Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They warned Washington that they were sitting ducks.
They begged for help.
Help didn't come.
4 Americans are dead.
Like I say keep repeating it does not make it true, but if you sleep better at night. You can believe it, but the truth is out and you are on the wrong side of it.
The Fox interview that went horribly wrong for Fox. Classic.
This is quick sand for Faux News. Benghazi is where they have jumped the shark. I think this will be the end for them. They already had no credibility now they are going to be seen for what they really are, which is just a trashy tabloid, no different than the national enquirer.
Anything from Media Matters can be counted on to be either a distortion of the truth or a flat out lie. They are a liberal propaganda machine, funded by George Soros. Hilary Clinton also was involved in it's founding, and since she is also under fire for her responsibility in the Benghazi attack and deaths of four Americans, it is no surprise that Media Matters would be defending the Administration.
The facts are that this is not a "Fox News claim"; it happened, and we have plenty of evidence.
In the first place, please explain why the administration fabricated a story about a video and for at least two or three weeks after the attack, were still dishing out that story.
We have learned that administration officials were watching the attack in real time in the White House Situation Room, and it can be safely assumed that Obama was also watching. They knew from the beginning that this was not a "spontaneous attack" about a video, and they had received multiple request for added security and of a build up of al-Qaeda (allowed, incidentally, because of Obama's facilitating the Muslim Brotherhood taking power in Egypt and Libya).
The investigations that have been done largely by Fox News reporters, like Jennifer Griffen, and others, has been extensive, and they have much evidence, including emails and other correspondence, supporting their findings.
Anything from Media Matters can be counted on to be either a distortion of the truth or a flat out lie. They are a liberal propaganda machine, funded by George Soros. Hilary Clinton also was involved in it's founding, and since she is also under fire for her responsibility in the Benghazi attack and deaths of four Americans, it is no surprise that Media Matters would be defending the Administration.
The facts are that this is not a "Fox News claim"; it happened, and we have plenty of evidence.
In the first place, please explain why the administration fabricated a story about a video and for at least two or three weeks after the attack, were still dishing out that story.
We have learned that administration officials were watching the attack in real time in the White House Situation Room, and it can be safely assumed that Obama was also watching. They knew from the beginning that this was not a "spontaneous attack" about a video, and they had received multiple request for added security and of a build up of al-Qaeda (allowed, incidentally, because of Obama's facilitating the Muslim Brotherhood taking power in Egypt and Libya).
The investigations that have been done largely by Fox News reporters, like Jennifer Griffen, and others, has been extensive, and they have much evidence, including emails and other correspondence, supporting their findings.
The video is from Fox posted by Media Matters. There is no commentary to the video by media matters. We can discuss the video, the rest of your post is off topic. The topic is the response. If you don't want to believe a four star general and would prefer to read Fox's "sources"...stick your head back in the sand.
Steve Hayes said something that I found fishy last night on Greta regarding the latest documents
found, basically he said the documents looked authentic and not forged.
I may have missed something but I don't recall anybody questioning the authenticity of the
documents so why would he bring it up?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Media Matters Lies.
