Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-18-2012, 10:01 AM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,899,377 times
Reputation: 11259

Advertisements

Get used to it ya stinkin' conservatives what is yours is mine and what is mine is mine
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-18-2012, 10:06 AM
 
Location: Just transplanted to FL from the N GA mountains
3,997 posts, read 4,145,129 times
Reputation: 2677
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
The boomers will be the first generation to contribute more than they get back.
And full retirement for them ranges from 65-67.
Didn't they extend that to 70 already for those of us at the end of the Boomer's (born 1962 to 1964)? I could have sworn my last statement said early retirement for me was 67.. full-retirement at 70. Must go find that statement......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2012, 10:11 AM
 
1,392 posts, read 2,861,228 times
Reputation: 1124
Damn u mean I got another 21 years before I can finally get a damn check, geeeze
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2012, 10:23 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,765,593 times
Reputation: 20674
I do not call an article that begins as this one does as impartial:

" It's bad enough that we've been forced to bail out Wall Street. But now the Obama administration is hatching plans to raid our retirement savings, too."

I keep forgetting life was just peachy right up till 1/20/2009.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2012, 10:32 AM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,285,332 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
I do not call an article that begins as this one does as impartial:

" It's bad enough that we've been forced to bail out Wall Street. But now the Obama administration is hatching plans to raid our retirement savings, too."

I keep forgetting life was just peachy right up till 1/20/2009.
What members of Congress or from the White House were considering using private savings as a way to pay off the $16 trillion before Obama and his Democrat controlled Congress started looking that direction. Yep, that date was the beginning of the end of our private savings accounts. I guess they reasoned that if they could rape Social Security so many years they may as well go after private savings that the government had been pushing so hard for so long.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2012, 10:44 AM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,765,593 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by aus10 View Post
Didn't they extend that to 70 already for those of us at the end of the Boomer's (born 1962 to 1964)? I could have sworn my last statement said early retirement for me was 67.. full-retirement at 70. Must go find that statement......
Full benefit age depends on your birth year. The current minimum age 67 for those born in or after 1960.

Postponing the draw on full benefits up to age 70 is optional and when done, increases the receipient's monthly income, thereafter.

Ryan/Romney called for slowly increasing the retirement age to account for increased longevity and was embraced by Simpson-Bowels.

Opponents to this approach reportedly argue that such an across the board plan would likely hurt lower income folk moreso because so many perform physically demanding work that they cannot sustain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2012, 10:47 AM
 
Location: Arizona
13,778 posts, read 9,667,797 times
Reputation: 7485
Quote:
Originally Posted by waitingtundra View Post
Damn u mean I got another 21 years before I can finally get a damn check, geeeze
Jeez, I sure wish I had to wait another 21 years before I was elegible for a Social Security check.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2012, 10:54 AM
 
Location: Just transplanted to FL from the N GA mountains
3,997 posts, read 4,145,129 times
Reputation: 2677
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Full benefit age depends on your birth year. The current minimum age 67 for those born in or after 1960.

Postponing the draw on full benefits up to age 70 is optional and when done, increases the receipient's monthly income, thereafter.

Ryan/Romney called for slowly increasing the retirement age to account for increased longevity and was embraced by Simpson-Bowels.

Opponents to this approach reportedly argue that such an across the board plan would likely hurt lower income folk more so because so many perform physically demanding work that they cannot sustain.
Yep... just pulled out both hubby and my statements... He born in 60.. me in 62.. And what does he do? Physically demanding work, so I guess we are going to be the test rats in this experiment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2012, 10:55 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,519,997 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by aus10 View Post
Didn't they extend that to 70 already for those of us at the end of the Boomer's (born 1962 to 1964)? I could have sworn my last statement said early retirement for me was 67.. full-retirement at 70. Must go find that statement......
Early retirement is still 62 for everyone.
Full retirement ranges from 65-67
You get extra if you hold off til 70
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2012, 10:57 AM
 
Location: None of your business
5,466 posts, read 4,424,993 times
Reputation: 1179
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
Get used to it ya stinkin' conservatives what is yours is mine and what is mine is mine
even if you sat on your ass then think you deserve a dime of what you are sucking off people now. Actually since we are heading toward it anyway, a fabian society will just get rid of a lot of the leaches. Of course you don't have a clue lol

Forward!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top