Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-18-2012, 07:27 AM
 
Location: North Texas
24,561 posts, read 40,328,800 times
Reputation: 28564

Advertisements

Hateful idiots like Westboro Baptist are the price we all pay for our freedom of speech.

I wish they'd shut up and go away, but it's not my place to force them to shut up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-18-2012, 08:57 PM
 
12,867 posts, read 14,932,390 times
Reputation: 4459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
If they start supporting a political party, yes....and some have and others have been strongly warned.

However, you cannot infringe on their ability to speak out on social issues and so forth.....like abortion, death penalty and so forth.

For example, your views would have been used to suppress the civil rights movement which had deep deep roots in the church and the powers that be could easily deem those to be political views and started shutting down the churches etc. Careful what power you wish to give others without weighing the impact over ALL issues.
the various churches may indeed speak out all they want on ANY political issue, but then you shouldn't get tax money from the citizens. that doesn't "suppress" anything-because they can raise their own money for the causes they feel strongly towards, and what is wrong with that?-- put your OWN money where your mouth is.

i believe in a separation of church and state.:

The Pilgrim fathers fled this system of State-religion. They knew that a "state tithe" for Anglicanism was not an endorsement of religion per se. It was the forcible imposition of one religion over all others. Some colonies then developed their own miniature state religions, which generated the same problem on a different scale. The Constitution settled the issue by preventing the government from weighing in on behalf of any particular established Church. This affording minority religions protection from the unfair advantage gleaned by any church able to align with government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:04 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top