Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
His logic is straight forward, and not the least bit non sequitur.
You have a source that conveniently supports your view, which you conveniently choose not to reveal. That's two forms of convenience for the price of one.
It doesn't convenience me in the least because:
1. I don't have a dog in the fight. I'm not personally connected to this event
2. It's not my blog
It would be convenient for me to just post the link and be done with it. I don't need to approval or admiration from random internet dudes. I know the blog exists, I know a family's life was torn apart and I know the child who was killed was real. That's quite enough for me.
1. I don't have a dog in the fight. I'm not personally connected to this event
2. It's not my blog
It would be convenient for me to just post the link and be done with it. I don't need to approval or admiration from random internet dudes. I know the blog exists, I know a family's life was torn apart and I know the child who was killed was real. That's quite enough for me.
You speak of integrity .. yet you don't know the meaning. You cite a blog as evidence that a child was murdered, yet you refuse to name the source. Because you identified it as a "Blog" , it is an openly published site on the internet, for the purpose of presenting information which is intended to be viewed. This isn't like revealing the name and address of an individual wishing to remain anonymous.
So, you take it upon yourself to protect this blogger's identity for some strange reason, which is generally the opposite of what a blogger would want done .... they want visitors and readers .. if they didn't, they wouldn't be blogging!
I've come a long ways from selling night crawlers on the dock.....
When we see folks that are making public policy now, we have to try to understand where they get their ideals.
Hard to imagine some of 'em ever gettin' their fingernails dirty.
Or try to imagine any of 'em spending a weekend in the woods without a tent.
For fun.
I'd go longer if my boss would allow it.
I was between 5 and 10 years old doing that. I thought being a paper boy was too much work
Digging bait, clams mussels, and assorted other shell fish was fun.. Fishing and hunting were more fun... great way to kill time, and still earn money and or feed my family.
These days the IRS would be after me for the sales of course. After all at the end i got $13.00 dollars a bushel for Ipswich/ Essex Steamed clams
Probably Dad would be arrested for child labor laws, and I would have grown up 'Gay' wearing my 4 sisters panties.. unable to do much but go shopping.
Dad was a WW-2 sub man vet, and had his eye on National Interests, which was always getting him screwed over, so he had almost nothing, but even after he retired the gov was still in his case about guidance system parts, which are still used today, and are classified.
When my little bro pasted away in 98' I was talking with the FBI all about that because no one then or since ever found his ID, and the FBI was driving my mother insane, and she was already, so the gaff came down on me, and i didn't like it.
LOL man are you kidding me? These poly tics would die inside of the first 15 minutes of there were dropped off in my neck of the woods beyond man made light.
You could give em a tent, but they would never get it figured out in broad day light.
You know as well as I, that if there is a problem the only way to get it fixed is to add a tax
Hell! the people are going broke! Our dollars are worth 4 cents each and what do the big They do? Add TAXES! I can say this with a grin, since anything else would lend to the idea i was insane..
Told a big shot not to black my trail at a place up heya' in NH in winter, right off the top of my pung (logging sled) converted to carry people (dead wood) This was drawn by 2 draft horses.
What looked like a parking space at a ski resort out back was not, but it looked that way other than the signs I made that were complicated reading. 'Don't Park Here!
Guy moves out and i enter the trail... do the pull around for the 45 minutes and return and that guys 4x4 big black jeep wagon is once more blocking my way, but out this time.
Man I was working 3 jobs a week, and 2 jobs a day, and i didn't need that BS besides i worked at anything else that came up....
No Problem... Spin the pung in it's tracks chain up that jeep and drag it 250 yards to a turn out I had made on a wet area next to the Saco River that refused to freeze up solid every day.
A small delay on my schedule In the morning just before i left for work the phone rang and it was a desk at that ski area.. They said the guy was a little irate... I told the desk guy I would be there on time at 4:00 pm and was off to my day time job..
Got a call at work around 10 LOL Tow Truck driver knew me, and where I worked on cars, and he got his truck stuck Ha ha Ha... Told the Boss I had a personal emergency and left. Got the horses hitched the pung, and twitched that wrecker out, to send that guy on his way...
The jeep guy figures he can be all sorts of condescending and mean spirited about it, telling me all about his friends in Mass DOT... I raised one eyebrow and said this ain't Mass, see ya around 4, have 100 bucks and left. Some SOB's just don't know when to quit.
By around 9:00 pm later that night that guy came with CASH at 250 and had learned to dance my way, which was show up with beer and cash and other wise shut up... And i twitched his rig out between rides.
So no, the only way to teach a poly tic (plastic leach) is to TAX his ass back.. I still get a kick out of that threat of the Mass DOT. Ha Ha Ha
I wish now I knew all about this Viagra, since i had that horse pullin' thang down years ago.. Oh well, I haven't tried any of that Viagra yet.
I hope you find this before the mods do....... I am so sure it's OT..
Interesting! I pointed out this little confrontation earlier ... but I didn't see the camera being carried ... all I saw was some guy giving this person the business for quite a while, behaving extremely hostile.
Oh yes, and I also noted the unusual number of people wearing "purple" in that crowd. That might not be unusual at a Minnesota Vikings football game, but in a random crowd, purple is not a dominant color, and it did stand out enough to me to take note and mention it. Maybe "purple" was the official color for "supervisors" of the event. Of course to the unwashed masses, that's just crazy talk ... ooohhh now purple is a conspiracy theory!!!
You cannot win such arguments.
About how many viewings have you at this point in study? You have more than i do for sure, but i don't have the time really.
You speak of integrity .. yet you don't know the meaning. You cite a blog as evidence that a child was murdered, yet you refuse to name the source. Because you identified it as a "Blog" , it is an openly published site on the internet, for the purpose of presenting information which is intended to be viewed. This isn't like revealing the name and address of an individual wishing to remain anonymous.
So, you take it upon yourself to protect this blogger's identity for some strange reason, which is generally the opposite of what a blogger would want done .... they want visitors and readers .. if they didn't, they wouldn't be blogging!
Some strange reason? LOL Not so strange. I'm a mother, daughter, aunt and wife. I know what loss feels like (though thankfully I've never lost a child I loved) and I can't imagine giving people a link to harass someone already in deep throes of pain.
If you want to see it so bad, you'll figure it out. I'm not going to help you.
Don, the simple answer to this can be explained as "if you can't dazzle them with brilliance, bombard them with BS". It's pure overload ... psychological warfare attacking you from every angle. People react in various ways ... the simple minded folks who tend to believe the official story no matter what, will not be phased at all by this deluge of inconsistencies, while some others who might be a bit sharper witted and naturally more skeptical and open to certain possibilities, will look at the situation and dismiss a conspiracy based on some of the more inexplicable items like memorial pages being created prior to the event. This person will quite logically conclude that no one is that stupid ... and if it were a staged event, the conspirators (whoever they are) would be too smart to expose themselves with such "mistakes". And then, items like the Sandy Hook reference found in the Batman film .... well, that's just too much for their minds to grab hold of ... because the implications are so unbelievable to them, they just ignore it, or write it off as a coincidence.
Case in point ... one argument I've heard was that it's got to be a real event and not staged, because of the changing stories!! That's right!!! It's the constantly changing story that proves the story is true! The logic this argument follows is, if they had this planned ahead of time, Ryan Lanza wouldn't have been incorrectly identified as the shooter to begin with. For many people, this serves as very sound logic ... but what they don't account for is that it doesn't explain the plethora of other errors that are simply impossible to explain as simple mistakes, such as identifying Nancy Lanza as a Sandy Hook school teacher, who was also one of the dead victims inside the school. Since she wasn't there at all, and the latest story is that she had no connection at all to the school .. how could authorities mistakenly place her dead at the scene an hour or two before they allegedly found her body at her home? There is no way to explain that logically. Furthermore, we have the other teacher, when asked about Nancy Lanza, claiming that she knew her and she was a wonderful kindergarten teacher. So it's this constant twisting of stories, and endless list of contradictions that some people write off as just a "fog of confusion" that can be expected with such a horrific event. In other words ... don't bother me with all of these details ... lets just let the dust settle, and the authorities will tell us what really happened.
And then there is that 10% or so that actually can see through this crap, but they are drown out by the other 90% ... and they too become frustrated to the point of paralysis, finding it impossible to engage in a sensible discussion of the event with anyone.
Like I said earlier ... it's like that game "Whack the Mole" ... lies, distortions, inconsistencies, changing stories popping up here .. popping up there ... popping up all over the place, which has everyone chasing their tails ... like trying to herd scattering cats.
That's what's going on here ... and truthfully, of all of the major events that certainly appear to be some type of false flag or staged event .. I've never seen so many blatantly obvious red flags and contradictions to any "official story". I'm even to the point where I don't know how to even define these things in a logical narrative ... too many things point in too many different directions, and the simple answer is, that's precisely what is supposed to happen ... bombard them with BS until their heads explode, and people will be embroiled in constant arguments among each other trying to sort this craziness out.
And that is what is happening.
That's a good explanation but I'm looking at this from 20,000 feet and including everything that we have been experiencing or hearing about for the past few years. It all points in one general direction when you consider all the data available. Something very big is happening.
Some strange reason? LOL Not so strange. I'm a mother, daughter, aunt and wife. I know what loss feels like (though thankfully I've never lost a child I loved) and I can't imagine giving people a link to harass someone already in deep throes of pain.
If you want to see it so bad, you'll figure it out. I'm not going to help you.
What ever you are viewing it's probably fake or a fabrication.
You know, I'm open to just about anything, but I couldn't quite see the "walking in circles", at least the way the video was edited. Not saying they weren't, but I couldn't see it.
Take a peek at the person with the yellow coat on who continually makes sudden stops and turns and seems to be just walking in circles. In the first half is where that one is. Check him out. He stops suddenly, turns and goes a few steps and then goes a few more. I selected him because he is so easy to see with no other yellow jackets around at the time.
About how many viewings have you at this point in study? You have more than i do for sure, but i don't have the time really.
Oh God, I have no idea ... there are so many different and interesting perspectives, I've looked at a minimum of 50 different ones, and most of them more than once ... and that is another point that shouldn't be overlooked .... the shear volume of videos dissecting this event in such detail. Where there is this much smoke, there is sure to be fire. So, I don't let the nay sayers deter me from looking at these anomalies with a critical eye, because I'm telling you that there are more people questioning the legitimacy of this event than there are people accepting the official story at face value.
These alleged family members of victims all come across as less than totally credible, with some of them looking and behaving in a very phony manner. That coupled with the many contradictory stories that kept changing just screams fake to me. That Gene Rosen character? A total melodramatic phony, hands down, no doubt at all that this guy is a fraud ... I'm 100% certain that his half baked story is pure fantasy.
What ever you are viewing it's probably fake or a fabrication.
Since I've frequented the site for the past 8 years, I am going to say no ****ing way.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The logic this argument follows is, if they had this planned ahead of time, Ryan Lanza wouldn't have been incorrectly identified as the shooter to begin with. For many people, this serves as very sound logic ... but what they don't account for is that it doesn't explain the plethora of other errors that are simply impossible to explain as simple mistakes, such as identifying Nancy Lanza as a Sandy Hook school teacher, who was also one of the dead victims inside the school. Since she wasn't there at all, and the latest story is that she had no connection at all to the school .. how could authorities mistakenly place her dead at the scene an hour or two before they allegedly found her body at her home? There is no way to explain that logically. Furthermore, we have the other teacher, when asked about Nancy Lanza, claiming that she knew her and she was a wonderful kindergarten teacher. So it's this constant twisting of stories, and endless list of contradictions that some people write off as just a "fog of confusion" that can be expected with such a horrific event. In other words ... don't bother me with all of these details ... lets just let the dust settle, and the authorities will tell us what really happened.
