Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think London and Paris are beckoning to you. Have a nice trip.
Oh, I visit often. But I'm not moving anywhere. I'd much rather live here and work toward a realistic goal of making most guns difficult to obtain and difficult to transfer to others (and expensive); of getting universal background checks and universal registration; of limiting the capacities of magazines; and of making it difficult to carry guns in public.
If you don't believe in universal background checks and you don't want any system that impacts responsible gun owners, what is the solution to take guns out of the hands of criminals.
And thats that... We cant afford the out of control police state we have now and you "liberal" bootlickers just keep begging for more...
In Missouri they are getting real nutty, they have a bill calling for outright confiscation...
THAT is the goal, every time they pass something they call it "a good first step"...
So my response is NO not one more "reasonable" law...
Again, now that legal private sell requires no background check, no record of sale.
The enforcement we are talking about is if there is a universal system. Then if you bought a gun from someone, private sale, without a background check, you now have an illegal firearm.
I live life like the Constitution intended. Individual liberty, or give me death.
What works for me may not work for you. What works for you, may not work for me.
If you wish to give up your freedom, don't force me to give up mine.
I live life like the Constitution intended. Individual liberty, or give me death.
What works for me may not work for you. What works for you, may not work for me.
If you wish to give up your freedom, don't force me to give up mine.
What freedom is anyone suggesting be taken from you? A background check when you buy a gun does not, in anyway violate your second amendment rights. Limiting the magazine size you can legally buy, does not in anyway violate your second amendment rights.
Again, now that legal private sell requires no background check, no record of sale.
The enforcement we are talking about is if there is a universal system. Then if you bought a gun from someone, private sale, without a background check, you now have an illegal firearm.
So then your for registration, admit it... Then once their registered you will happily turn in your guns when they ban em "for the children" right???
Again, now that legal private sell requires no background check, no record of sale.
The enforcement we are talking about is if there is a universal system. Then if you bought a gun from someone, private sale, without a background check, you now have an illegal firearm.
That would be most guns. If I sell a gun to my neighbor who could prove I ever owned it or he does now? Who knows I own a gun I bought cash from my paper route money in 1968 at a gunshop am I a criminal now 44 years later ? what if I sold it or traded it 20 years ago? am I a criminal now? aint nobody gonna register anything so dream on, this is America
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
