Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-28-2013, 02:47 AM
 
3,846 posts, read 2,386,781 times
Reputation: 390

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
Seeing as if you're born a citizen, you are a natural-born citizen. There is no need to call anyone a natural born citizen, since its obvious that by being born a citizen, you are a natural born citizen. This concept was familiar to our found fathers, since they were schooled in English Common Law, and the basis of over 500 years of Anglo Saxon law concerning citizens and subjects.

There are only two types of citizens in this country: Natural born (born on US Soil or born to US Citizens parents broad) and Naturalized (those who become citizens through Naturalization).
Were the framers drunk? I don't think so. There are no redundancies in the U.S. Constitution.

//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...?#post28869963
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-28-2013, 07:56 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,088,210 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmmjv View Post
Would the same apply to Barack Obama if he had been born in Kenya?
No. In 1961, the law regarding parental time in country was more restrictive, and Obama's mother missed the cut.

But since Obama was born in Hawaii, it doesn't matter.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmmjv
Ted Cruz's situation, born in a foreign country, mother was an American citizen, father wasn't, is the exact same situation the birthers claim for Obama
Not really. Under both the earlier and later version's of the law, Cruz's mother meets the residency criterion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2013, 07:58 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,088,210 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmmjv View Post
Also, that speaks of "citizens" and not "natural born citizens"
Since the US Constitution recognizes only two classes of citizenship (naturalized and natural-born), your distinction here is meaningless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2013, 07:59 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,088,210 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nonarchist View Post
Were the framers drunk?
Probably some.

George Washington
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2013, 08:08 AM
 
4,911 posts, read 3,432,537 times
Reputation: 1257
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
No. In 1961, the law regarding parental time in country was more restrictive, and Obama's mother missed the cut.

But since Obama was born in Hawaii, it doesn't matter.


Not really. Under both the earlier and later version's of the law, Cruz's mother meets the residency criterion.
It doesn't matter when they were born. The change in law would apply to both of them. You haven't given any evidence that there was a change in law anyway

What's the difference between Obama's mother who was an American citizen, and Cruz's mother who was an American citizen?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2013, 08:09 AM
 
4,911 posts, read 3,432,537 times
Reputation: 1257
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
Since the US Constitution recognizes only two classes of citizenship (naturalized and natural-born), your distinction here is meaningless.
It's not my distinction. It's the distinction of the birthers
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2013, 08:40 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,088,210 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmmjv View Post
It's not my distinction. It's the distinction of the birthers
It was the distinction in your post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2013, 09:12 AM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,088,210 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmmjv View Post
It doesn't matter when they were born.
Of course it does. The Constitution explicitly frowns on statutory retroactivity. Article 1, Section 9, Paragraph 3.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmmjv
The change in law would apply to both of them. You haven't given any evidence that there was a change in law anyway.
The change was not retroactive.

Here is your evidence of the change.

The Volokh Conspiracy - Correction About Natural-Born Citizen Law:

The law when Obama was born required that the citizen parent "was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years."

In 1986 this was changed to a requirement that the citizen parent "was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years."

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmmjv
What's the difference between Obama's mother who was an American citizen, and Cruz's mother who was an American citizen?
Obama's mother was only 18 years old when her son was born, meaning that she did not meet the five years "after attaining the age of fourteen years" requirement.

While I do not know the birth date for Cruz's mother, I do know that she graduated from Rice University in 1956, meaning she must have been in her mid 30s when her son was born.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-28-2013, 09:55 AM
 
26,580 posts, read 14,461,486 times
Reputation: 7444
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmmjv View Post
"Donald Trump, for one,....
trump's involvement in birtherism has been absolutely comical. because of his birther antics he is currently involved in a lawsuit against bill maher were he, donald trump (or his attorney), will have to prove to a jury that a "reasonable person" could believe that he is potentially the spawn of an orangutan.

i'm torn between believing that trump is using birtherism intentionally to promote himself and "the apprentice" ( in which case i think it's detrimental to the long term viability of the brand name as a "high-end" product ) or if trump is really just that stupid and sheltered from reality.

here's trump's track record when it comes to birtherism:

he claimed a COLB is not legal proof of birth.

false. not only is it but trump himself recently displayed his COLB to prove his birth!

Donald Trump Releases Birth Certificate, Demands Bill Maher Pay Up The $5M | Mediaite

he claimed that obama's grandmother stated she was at obama's birth in kenya.

false. sarah obama never stated that and has consistently said the president was born in HI.

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/wp-co...iptlulu109.pdf

he claimed nobody remembers obama from college.

false. there are many accounts from classmates available.

Alumni Corner | Columbia College Today

he claimed to have sent investigators to hawaii.

.....still waiting on any evidence these guys actually existed.




will be interesting to see if trump can also f**k-up cruz's eligibility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:34 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top