Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-10-2013, 06:56 AM
 
Location: East St. Paul 651 forever (or North St. Paul) .
2,860 posts, read 3,387,163 times
Reputation: 1446

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Minority rights should never be voted on by the majority.
They should trump majority rights though, every time.

 
Old 05-10-2013, 07:09 AM
 
4,837 posts, read 4,167,640 times
Reputation: 1848
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Oh no, we are having a man and woman marriage.
Ah, well then carry on.
 
Old 05-10-2013, 07:11 AM
 
4,837 posts, read 4,167,640 times
Reputation: 1848
Quote:
Originally Posted by Govie View Post
They should trump majority rights though, every time.
Uh, how exactly are majority rights being trumped?
 
Old 05-10-2013, 07:11 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,384,037 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlerain View Post
I cannot accept your opinion as natural or normal.

That's just it.

It's not my opinion.

It is fact.

Both heterosexual unions and homosexual unions cannot be according to nature's design.

One has to be a perversion of the natural.
 
Old 05-10-2013, 07:17 AM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,384,037 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
I don't care what you accept, or don't accept. You can remain ignorant to the fact for as long as you wish. But homosexuality is natural, occurring in nature, and normal, for those that are homosexual. It is not statistically the norm, but neither are left.handed people, natural red heads, or people with genius IQs.


Even if it exists elsewhere in nature, using the anus for a vagina is never natural.

It serves no biological function and is therefore a perversion of normal sex.

That's not an opinion.

That's a fact.
 
Old 05-10-2013, 07:18 AM
 
Location: Seattle Area
3,451 posts, read 7,055,848 times
Reputation: 3614
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
That's just it.

It's not my opinion.

It is fact.

Both heterosexual unions and homosexual unions cannot be according to nature's design.

One has to be a perversion of the natural.
Your opinion is not fact.
 
Old 05-10-2013, 07:18 AM
 
4,837 posts, read 4,167,640 times
Reputation: 1848
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
I don't care what you accept, or don't accept. You can remain ignorant to the fact for as long as you wish. But homosexuality is natural, occurring in nature, and normal, for those that are homosexual. It is not statistically the norm, but neither are left.handed people, natural red heads, or people with genius IQs.
See, it doesn't matter if it's natural or not. The point is, it is blatant discrimination to deny gays the privilege to marry that heteros enjoy. BLATANT DISCRIMINATION. The naysayers can sputter, spin it, deny it any way they want. They are discriminators. That's it. And quite frankly, it's stupid. Stupid to road block it. Stupid to even put it up for a vote. Who votes on whether someone can get married or not? What the hell kind of country do we live in anyway?
 
Old 05-10-2013, 07:19 AM
 
4,837 posts, read 4,167,640 times
Reputation: 1848
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Even if it exists elsewhere in nature, using the anus for a vagina is never natural.

It serves no biological function and is therefore a perversion of normal sex.

That's not an opinion.

That's a fact.
Doesn't matter. You don't want to have anal sex, don't do it. Though, I'm pretty sure the majority of heteros have indeed engaged in anal sex at one time or another. They just don't want to admit it.
 
Old 05-10-2013, 07:20 AM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,207,906 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
Even if it exists elsewhere in nature, using the anus for a vagina is never natural.

It serves no biological function and is therefore a perversion of normal sex.

That's not an opinion.

That's a fact.
You might want to discuss your opinions with mother nature.

BTW the DEFINITION of natural is "Existing in or caused by nature; not made or caused by humankind"
SO, if something is occurring in nature it is by definition natural.
 
Old 05-10-2013, 07:20 AM
 
4,837 posts, read 4,167,640 times
Reputation: 1848
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoD Guy View Post
There's announcing, and then there's flaunting.
Two separate things.
Thanks for trying to keep up.
Well why don't you define it for us then instead of ranting about it?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:24 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top