Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-16-2013, 06:59 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,210,872 times
Reputation: 17209

Advertisements

"This is really serious business this IRS thing and it's not going to be forgot for decades"

Chris Matthews.

Matthews: President Runs IRS, Treasury | Washington Free Beacon
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-16-2013, 07:05 AM
 
Location: South East
4,209 posts, read 3,590,080 times
Reputation: 1465
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
“In one case, the IRS withheld approval of an application for tax exempt status for Coalition for Life of Iowa. In a phone call to Coalition for Life of Iowa leaders on June 6, 2009, the IRS agent ‘Ms. Richards’ told the group to send a letter to the IRS with the entire board’s signatures stating that, under perjury of the law, they do not picket/protest or organize groups to picket or protest outside of Planned Parenthood,” the Thomas More Society announced today. “Once the IRS received this letter, their application would be approved.”

Report: IRS denied tax-exempt status to pro-lifers on behalf of Planned Parenthood | WashingtonExaminer.com
They also targeted Franklin Graham and other religious groups. Conveniently around election time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2013, 07:13 AM
 
Location: The Lone Star State
8,030 posts, read 9,054,282 times
Reputation: 5050
Quote:
Originally Posted by stayinformed40 View Post
How convenient these groups were targeted as the election was in progress.

Obama's house of cards are falling down around him.

Religious Groups Claim To Be Targets Of IRS Scrutiny
.
Conservative Christians and Jews targeted, and even reported by HuffPo...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2013, 07:20 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,884,155 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Hey, don't worry, "The One" will remain pristine.
Has nothing to do with left/right.

The IRS can move and act and disregard laws when they want to.
I was just showing that a tax exempt illegally operating for 2 years can get record approval.
So the IRS made up for the 3 years dragging of other applications by approving this one in record time in spite of their illegal actions and made them retroactive so they weren't illegal anymore.
YOU stated that this particular foundation was "left-leaning". I've asked you to explain why, now for the THIRD time. Are you now saying that an organization whose activities take place in Kenya and involve building homes and churches is not "left-leaning"????????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2013, 07:21 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
From what I read the IRS has narrowed this down to 2 employees at the Cincinnati office.
Yet the number of applications targeted has risen to over 500 now.

This is all being blamed on the employees and their union is silent, not saying one word about this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2013, 07:23 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,884,155 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXStrat View Post
So, following a careful review of the thread today, the poorly crafted narrative from the left seems to be:

1. IRS scandal is actually a non-issue despite the fact that Dem leadership has said otherwise.
2. Citizens United decision still has liberals butt hurt. They expect all to ignore the fact that the real reason they oppose the decision is because it erased their one time monopoly on fund raising via labor unions. Now that "management" can donate, it is somehow unfair.
3. The IRS director when it started was a Bush appointee. This line of reasoning expects people to ignore all previous claims of the scandal being the sole fault of low level employees, and the current mantra of a "couple of rogue employees."
4. Conservatives are tax cheats. Never mind Geithner, Hicks, et. Al.


Hope that works for yall. When truth is stacked against you, it will be an uphill fight.

Just to clarify---"Citizens United decision still has liberals butt hurt," which implies that conservatives support the Citizens United decision. Is that true? Do you support the Citizens United decision by the SCOTUS?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2013, 07:23 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
YOU stated that this particular foundation was "left-leaning". I've asked you to explain why, now for the THIRD time. Are you now saying that an organization whose activities take place in Kenya and involve building homes and churches is not "left-leaning"????????
Why must the group be left..why not the applicant ?
In this case Obama's relative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2013, 07:24 AM
 
Location: South East
4,209 posts, read 3,590,080 times
Reputation: 1465
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
From what I read the IRS has narrowed this down to 2 employees at the Cincinnati office.
Yet the number of applications targeted has risen to over 500 now.
I just read on a facebook link that it is now 4 people. This is going to keep growing and there is no telling when the actual truth will come out.

I find it very convenient the timeline coincides with the election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2013, 07:25 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,884,155 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tilt11 View Post
Then if he knew of this, he should be going to jail. Not fired. JAIL!
For what crime???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2013, 07:26 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,210,872 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Just to clarify---"Citizens United decision still has liberals butt hurt," which implies that conservatives support the Citizens United decision. Is that true? Do you support the Citizens United decision by the SCOTUS?
I do and this is a perfect example as to why. McCain/Feingold was nothing but a blatant attempt to squash the free speech rights of people politicians did not want speaking.

And before we go there, not a single corporation was a part of the lawsuit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:13 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top