Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 05-29-2013, 01:27 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,572,254 times
Reputation: 29289

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nonarchist View Post
Republican black people who smoke pot suffer from face-eating munchie disease.

Beat that!

Pot-paranoid black youth flees gun-wielding ceut-freaked white authoritarian slob.
i'll try.

scientifically illiterate paranoid lunatics latch onto hilarious satire article about canadians banning nonexistent GMO cucumbers that cause pubic hair to fall out in "a pile of hair that looked like a chihuahua puppy" - and proclaim this to be 'running neck and neck with reality.'


 
Old 05-29-2013, 01:32 PM
 
8,631 posts, read 9,141,307 times
Reputation: 5990
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamofmonterey View Post
Hard to believe anyone is FOR GMO's, and feeding garbage to their family.

People have a right to know what's in their food, and research so they don't become a burden on the medical system and need medical care. It is a win-win to support Organic and healthy foods.

But perhaps some are too partisan to see facts.
Not partisan but instead dumb as a box of frosted flakes.
 
Old 05-29-2013, 01:32 PM
 
Location: Northern CA
12,770 posts, read 11,568,492 times
Reputation: 4262
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
because non-existent GMO cucumbers are causing massive losses of pubic hair within the canadian populace - this is your reality?
Their long-term goal appears to be nothing less than the complete and permanent poisoning of the world's food supply.

Their products are causing sterility and cancer.

The Canada story might be a parody, but it's not far from the truth. They threw that out there intentionally to discredit the true horror of what Monsanto is doing. It's not funny.
 
Old 05-29-2013, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
1,165 posts, read 1,515,387 times
Reputation: 445
Quote:
Originally Posted by weltschmerz View Post
So far, you're doing a bang-up job of ignoring me. Keep it up.
Whether you ignore me or not, the FACT remains.....rats get tumours no matter what you feed them. A LOT of tumours. Big ugly ones. I should know; I certainly spent enough on vet bills.
Have I ever told you that I adore everything you post?

Perhaps this is a piece that Steven_h or whatever the name is should read. Actually, everybody should read it. It may be of interest to you as well for extra tidbits if you haven't read it, but I see you've already worked it out for yourself.

http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/20...cine-movement/

Last edited by Cnote11; 05-29-2013 at 01:49 PM..
 
Old 05-29-2013, 01:42 PM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,572,254 times
Reputation: 29289
Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper View Post
Their long-term goal appears to be nothing less than the complete and permanent poisoning of the world's food supply.
they seem to be doing a pretty poor job of that, seeing that not a single soul amongst the hundreds of millions who have consumed their products has been injured even slightly

Quote:
Their products are causing sterility and cancer.
poppycock. links pls?
natural news is always good for a laugh.

Quote:
The Canada story might be a parody
so now snopes didn't lie?

Quote:
but it's not far from the truth.
it's light-years from the truth.

Quote:
They threw that out there intentionally to discredit the true horror of what Monsanto is doing. It's not funny.
i found it hilarious, as it was intended. there is no 'horror' in what monsanto is doing.
 
Old 05-29-2013, 01:43 PM
 
382 posts, read 588,821 times
Reputation: 139
I say buy stock in Monsanto. Don't waste your time and money marching.
 
Old 05-29-2013, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Northern CA
12,770 posts, read 11,568,492 times
Reputation: 4262
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
they seem to be doing a pretty poor job of that, seeing that not a single soul amongst the hundreds of millions who have consumed their products has been injured even slightly



poppycock. links pls?
natural news is always good for a laugh.



so now snopes didn't lie?



it's light-years from the truth.



i found it hilarious, as it was intended. there is no 'horror' in what monsanto is doing.
from Natural News.

The U.S. Senate recently had an opportunity to vote on a farm bill amendment that would have supported the rights of states to mandate GMO labeling laws. The amendment, S.AMDT.965, was introduced by Sen. Bernie Sanders with the aim "...to permit States to require that any food, beverage, or other edible product offered for sale have a label on indicating that the food, beverage, or other edible product contains a genetically engineered ingredient.

This amendment quickly separated the wheat from the chaff, so to speak, on which U.S. senators believe in the rights of the people vs. the domination of corporations like Monsanto. Astonishingly, it also revealed that the two darling senators of the liberty movement -- Sen. Rand Paul and Sen. Ted Cruz -- were willing to sell out the people and vote in favor of Monsanto. (They both voted against the amendment to allow states to set GMO labeling laws.)

In all, seventy-one U.S. Senators, both democrats and republicans, voted against that amendment, selling out the American people to the interests of Monsanto. Many said they did so because they didn't want food labeling to be fragmented state by state. Food labeling is an issue the FDA should tackle, they explained. Yet the FDA is just another corporate sellout, we all know.

Learn more: The Monsanto 71 - Sellout senators shame themselves by siding with Monsanto on GMO labeling bill
 
Old 05-30-2013, 07:22 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,492,759 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper View Post
from Natural News.

[color=#000000]The U.S. Senate recently........................require that any food, beverage, or other edible product offered for sale have a label on indicating that the food, beverage, or other edible product contains a genetically engineered ingredient
oh please what ISNT genetic engineered

you think MSG, of corn syrup, or even REFINED sugar is not ENGINEERED

heck even BLEACHED flour, or PASTURIZED milk is ENGINEERED


you conspiracy freaks really take the cake
 
Old 05-30-2013, 07:33 AM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,572,254 times
Reputation: 29289
Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper View Post
from Natural News.

The U.S. Senate recently had an opportunity to vote on a farm bill amendment that would have supported the rights of states to mandate GMO labeling laws. The amendment, S.AMDT.965, was introduced by Sen. Bernie Sanders with the aim "...to permit States to require that any food, beverage, or other edible product offered for sale have a label on indicating that the food, beverage, or other edible product contains a genetically engineered ingredient.

This amendment quickly separated the wheat from the chaff, so to speak, on which U.S. senators believe in the rights of the people vs. the domination of corporations like Monsanto. Astonishingly, it also revealed that the two darling senators of the liberty movement -- Sen. Rand Paul and Sen. Ted Cruz -- were willing to sell out the people and vote in favor of Monsanto. (They both voted against the amendment to allow states to set GMO labeling laws.)

In all, seventy-one U.S. Senators, both democrats and republicans, voted against that amendment, selling out the American people to the interests of Monsanto. Many said they did so because they didn't want food labeling to be fragmented state by state. Food labeling is an issue the FDA should tackle, they explained. Yet the FDA is just another corporate sellout, we all know.

Learn more: The Monsanto 71 - Sellout senators shame themselves by siding with Monsanto on GMO labeling bill
you didn't adress the topic. here was your statement that i requested some substantiation for:

Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper View Post
Their products are causing sterility and cancer.
 
Old 05-31-2013, 04:29 PM
 
Location: :0)1 CORINTHIANS,13*"KYRIE, ELEISON"*"CHRISTE ELEISON"
3,078 posts, read 6,199,946 times
Reputation: 6002
Lightbulb Thank you

Quote:
Originally Posted by claudhopper View Post
from Natural News.

The U.S. Senate recently had an opportunity to vote on a farm bill amendment that would have supported the rights of states to mandate GMO labeling laws. The amendment, S.AMDT.965, was introduced by Sen. Bernie Sanders with the aim "...to permit States to require that any food, beverage, or other edible product offered for sale have a label on indicating that the food, beverage, or other edible product contains a genetically engineered ingredient.

This amendment quickly separated the wheat from the chaff, so to speak, on which U.S. senators believe in the rights of the people vs. the domination of corporations like Monsanto. Astonishingly, it also revealed that the two darling senators of the liberty movement -- Sen. Rand Paul and Sen. Ted Cruz -- were willing to sell out the people and vote in favor of Monsanto. (They both voted against the amendment to allow states to set GMO labeling laws.)

In all, seventy-one U.S. Senators, both democrats and republicans, voted against that amendment, selling out the American people to the interests of Monsanto. Many said they did so because they didn't want food labeling to be fragmented state by state. Food labeling is an issue the FDA should tackle, they explained. Yet the FDA is just another corporate sellout, we all know.

Learn more: The Monsanto 71 - Sellout senators shame themselves by siding with Monsanto on GMO labeling bill

Thanks for the link Claud
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top