Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Turn around is fair play. If it is fair to point out that polls showed Romney doing poorly with blacks to diminish him...then it is fair to show polls showing Obama doing poorly with non-blacks to diminish him.
Why does Obama have just a 39% approval rating (well below George W Bush at the moment) among all non-blacks?
Why does this contrast so sharply with blacks that have Obama's disapproval ratings in the single digits?
Why does Obama have just a 37% approval rating (well below George W Bush at the moment) among Independents?
Why does Obama's approval numbers perform the worst among the middle class and have higher approval ratings with the poor and then the rich?
because the rich get all the tax breaks, the poor get all the fallout from that. the middle class just holds a jar of vasiline and some bloody underwears
Turn around is fair play. If it is fair to point out that polls showed Romney doing poorly with blacks to diminish him...then it is fair to show polls showing Obama doing poorly with non-blacks to diminish him.
I don't see how it diminished him, please provide where it was stated this was done to diminish him, but to be president you need enough of the population to vote for you over the other guy. If he doesn't get the votes, he doesn't get the office. Is a lesson in elementary school civics needed here?
That's called reporting facts and reality. Reporting only the good news, and keeping the bad news from being reported, is biased propaganda. Are you really advocating that news entities should have selectively edited the news just to help Romney?
Last edited by EmeraldCityWanderer; 06-12-2013 at 08:04 AM..
Turn around is fair play. If it is fair to point out that polls showed Romney doing poorly with blacks to diminish him...then it is fair to show polls showing Obama doing poorly with non-blacks to diminish him.
How did polls showing Romney doing poorly with the black community "diminish" him?
Turn around is fair play. If it is fair to point out that polls showed Romney doing poorly with blacks to diminish him...then it is fair to show polls showing Obama doing poorly with non-blacks to diminish him.
Why does Obama have just a 39% approval rating (well below George W Bush at the moment) among all non-blacks?
Why does this contrast so sharply with blacks that have Obama's disapproval ratings in the single digits?
Why does Obama have just a 37% approval rating (well below George W Bush at the moment) among Independents?
Why does Obama's approval numbers perform the worst among the middle class and have higher approval ratings with the poor and then the rich?
There were posters on here, TV personalities, liberal coworkers all happy to point out Romney's poll numbers struggled with black voters = Romney is someway bad.
The fact that Obama's job performance struggles with so many groups - does that not equal something bad?
because the rich get all the tax breaks, the poor get all the fallout from that. the middle class just holds a jar of vasiline and some bloody underwears
uh oh, so the middle class is finally figuring it out.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
