Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So, because you were unable to argue your point back when that post was made, you thought you would bring it back up later after the thread has moved on in hopes nobody would go back and read the context of the discussion?
*chuckle*
You are brilliant. Though I am flattered that you place such value to my comments that you go searching for past discussions constantly in hopes of being able to pull an "I gotcha".
This is quite amusing.
Anyone who wants to see how the above poster is using out of context tactics (common to the political activist methods of CAGW), just follow back through the links and read the discussion. He has nothing, which is why he has to reintroduce arguments made months ago and use evidence from years ago.
These people are desperate, expect them to get more and more nasty as their ship sinks.
....so why do you appeal to the authority of Watt and Climate Audit? Can you answer it without deflecting? Are they your climate change lord and savior?
Really? The best you can do is to link to a youtube video from 2009?
Here, I will rebut that. Do a search on these forums concerning that video, I think you will find that it was already dealt with. Though if your religious belief requires you to grasp at straws, well... understandable and I will discuss with you no further. I want to respect your right to believe in anything you choose, but don't expect to argue your religious belief as science.
There you go again! Climate Change = religion. RUH OH!
Really? The best you can do is to link to a youtube video from 2009?
Here, I will rebut that. Do a search on these forums concerning that video, I think you will find that it was already dealt with. Though if your religious belief requires you to grasp at straws, well... understandable and I will discuss with you no further. I want to respect your right to believe in anything you choose, but don't expect to argue your religious belief as science.
All Hail the prophet Watts and his brainwashed acolytes!
Keep linking to his blog- I'm sure he appreciates the revenue from his sheep-like followers.
Climate change deniers are swiftly taking their rightful place among all of the other conspiracy theorists, such as truthers, chemtrail nuts, bigfoot believers, etc. Predictions of climate change are no longer solely based on computer modeling. It is based on observable facts.
Sanspeur, you're not doing yourself any favors using Al Gore as a source. The man has two mansions that are easily going to consume as much energy as a single family will in decades and has vast financial interests in the policies he's pushing. Open your eyes man.
Sanspeur, you're not doing yourself any favors using Al Gore as a source. The man has two mansions that are easily going to consume as much energy as a single family will in decades and has vast financial interests in the policies he's pushing. Open your eyes man.
If you got Al Gore through that link, it was a glitch of the TED Talks site...I attempted to link to James Hanson who unlike Gore is a real scientist...Try the second video.
Was there a team meeting for you guys or did your checks come in? *chuckle*
No, we are just all using the same facts.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
