Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
those are gang members, who cares, I care about honest hard working men and women and childern who have to run or hide and do not have the ability to fight back.
Google
Georgia kennesaw vs Chicago Illinois crime rate
So you want children to be armed with guns? That doesn't solve any problems because it is obvious gang members have no problem shooting at people that have guns on them.
Also while we are googling things, you should google NYC vs Chicago crime rate.
those are gang members, who cares, I care about honest hard working men and women and childern who have to run or hide and do not have the ability to fight back.
Google
Georgia kennesaw vs Chicago Illinois crime rate
The problem is that most of the innocent people are shot by stray bullets and not directly by some thug with a gun. Easing access to guns will reduce the crime rate, but not by much. As it currently stands the CPD only clears about 33% of homicide cases.
This isn't to say that Chicago's crime problem shouldn't be addressed - it should. As Illinois and Chicago pension and debt obligations continue to mount there is going to be less money available to even fight crime. There was a recent article that stated crime is down this year, but the cops had to put in a lot of overtime to achieve that reduction.
So you want children to be armed with guns? That doesn't solve any problems because it is obvious gang members have no problem shooting at people that have guns on them.
Also while we are googling things, you should google NYC vs Chicago crime rate.
How did you get that idea?
So we need to be unarmed because gang member don't value human life..yet the adds up.
as for gang members, if they were getting shot at by law abiding men and women, they would either be weeded out via attrition or would quit..
NYC is a police state safety at the cost of liberty is never a fair trade every.., and stop and frisk is over, lets watch the crime rate soar.
The problem is that most of the innocent people are shot by stray bullets and not directly by some thug with a gun. Easing access to guns will reduce the crime rate, but not by much. As it currently stands the CPD only clears about 33% of homicide cases.
This isn't to say that Chicago's crime problem shouldn't be addressed - it should. As Illinois and Chicago pension and debt obligations continue to mount there is going to be less money available to even fight crime. There was a recent article that stated crime is down this year, but the cops had to put in a lot of overtime to achieve that reduction.
And yet the urban artist meusesm is still getting funds, and many other failed lefty feel good projects..
Easing access to guns will not do a damn thing but create more victims, and further infringe upon a basic civil right.
So we need to be unarmed because gang member don't value human life..yet the adds up.
as for gang members, if they were getting shot at by law abiding men and women, they would either be weeded out via attrition or would quit..
NYC is a police state safety at the cost of liberty is never a fair trade every.., and stop and frisk is over, lets watch the crime rate soar.
So gang members would disappear if people were armed even though they haven't disappeared from other gang members being armed. I don't think a gang member cares about who is armed, they just might be quicker to shoot random bystanders to be on the safe side.
The ending of stop and frisk isn't going to make anything soar, that is like claiming getting rid of the security checkpoints at airports is going to make aviation terrorist attacks soar.
Crime in NYC had been going down for years and years and finally bottomed out in 2009.
Stop and Frisk was enacted in July of 2010 and crime has been going up since 2010.
That's not true. Stop and Frisk has been in place for at least 10 or 20 years.
So gang members would disappear if people were armed even though they haven't disappeared from other gang members being armed. I don't think a gang member cares about who is armed, they just might be quicker to shoot random bystanders to be on the safe side.
The ending of stop and frisk isn't going to make anything soar, that is like claiming getting rid of the security checkpoints at airports is going to make aviation terrorist attacks soar.
hey knowing you might get shot trying to mug someone might make them think twice, or get them shot, either way a great thing..as for the last bit apples and oranges. I mean a crip is nothing like a Suicide bomber.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Most of the budgetary problems in Chicago are related to unions and the underfunded pensions, not museums or zoos.
