Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You are to do the start. Don't expect me to do your job.
Well, my underlying assumptions are the number of healthy insured will decrease, the number of ill insured will increase, the outlays per insured person will rise dramatically.
Would you like to chime in now and show us your math skills and how that results in decreased premiums?
Explain what it is designed to do, what the outcome will be, and why that is desired.
For example, people with medical problems being able to get insurance, low-wage workers getting medical coverage, without having a baby. Being able to take a job you want, perhaps at a smaller firm, instead of limiting yourself to jobs that offer medical insurance. And a surprising number of young people deciding to become insured.
Not only are you utterly unwilling to discuss the realities of Obamacare, you are unwilling to discuss the validity of your totally absurd assumptions about basic human behavior.
We ALL know that insurance risk assessment is based in human behavior, not just math. In fact, the math is simple. It's the study and accuracy of predicting human behavior that distinguishes good risk analysis from bad.
I know that, you should know that, but yet, you've struggled very hard to be as stupid and moronic as possible. You know the truth isn't on your side... You only have ideology, and it's not a defensible one, at that.
For example, people with medical problems being able to get insurance, low-wage workers getting medical coverage, without having a baby. Being able to take a job you want, perhaps at a smaller firm, instead of limiting yourself to jobs that offer medical insurance. And a surprising number of young people deciding to become insured.
All of these are predicated that somehow you are owed or otherwise deserve to be given things that you can't pay for.
Can you explain why that assumption is a workable idea?
Not only are you utterly unwilling to discuss the realities of Obamacare, you are unwilling to discuss the validity of your totally absurd assumptions about basic human behavior.
We ALL know that insurance risk assessment is based in human behavior, not just math. In fact, the math is simple. It's the study and accuracy of predicting human behavior that distinguishes good risk analysis from bad.
I know that, you should know that, but yet, you've struggled very hard to be as stupid and moronic as possible. You know the truth isn't on your side... You only have ideology, and it's not a defensible one, at that.
Nothing you can do to change Jan 1. And the start of Obamacare. No matter how hard you try, how much to attempt to belittle someone, no matter how much you might hate it.
Turns out the young & healthy are not liking it much especially.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
