Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
oh please the building was open 24/7/365 because many of the occupents were WORLD WIDE ENTITIES
Salomon Smith Barney was the biggest occupant of wtc7...occupied most floors
American Express Bank International ......
Standard Chartered Bank ......
Provident Financial Management ......
ITT Hartford Insurance Group .....
First State Management Group, Inc ......
Federal Home Loan Bank .....
NAIC Securities
if there was ANY chance that the building was purposly brought down...dont ya think they would be jumping up and down screaming bloody murder
I thought destroying documents was the entire reason they brought down WTC 7. Much like the Pentagon, where the documents regarding Rumsfeld's missing $2.3 trillion dollars were magically destroyed the day after he had a press conference about it. Bye bye 2.3 trillion. No one will ever know where you went.
The point is that Saudi Arabia most likely FUNDED the attack. That is the most important question that was never answered or even investigated.
based on what? what you pulled out of your nether regions?
Al Quaeda was funded in the same way all terrorist groups are funded, through money laundering, via shill corporations/agencies, the illegal drug trade and selling weapons on the black market.
did you know that Silverstein has not made any money in the last 13 years. You know, because two of his leased properties are gone, and he had to foot much of the money to rebuild those missing buildings.
He has lost nearly $5-$10 million a year since 9/11 in rental earnings because of those missing buildings, with a lease that STILL expects to be paid every year to the New Jersey Port Authority (who own the WTC complex).
I think the entire point of the 9/11 truth movement is to discover just that, the truth. And truth is not found by turning on the television and listening to government people tell you what's truth. The problem I have is that people aren't willing to question and really search on their own for the truth of what happened that day.
More americans are beginning to question the official story. I think that's partly because we've had 12 years since of nothing but lies upon lies from our leaders about everything from WMD's to Wall Street scams, to NSA spying to starting more wars based on lies. Can we really believe the people who are in charge of our government? Do you trust them? I don't.
again, explain why the collapse was announced before it actually happened
No one was surprised that wTC 7 would collapse that day. firefighers on scene knew it would. They are on record hearing creaking and groaning in the hours before the final collapse happened.
If you're talking about the BBC news item, they have effectively trounced your claim:
did you know that Silverstein has not made any money in the last 13 years. You know, because two of his leased properties are gone, and he had to foot much of the money to rebuild those missing buildings.
He has lost nearly $5-$10 million a year since 9/11 in rental earnings because of those missing buildings, with a lease that STILL expects to be paid every year to the New Jersey Port Authority (who own the WTC complex).
Hey, well with Rummy's $2.3 trillion that magically disappeared, as cashrulez stated above, I'm sure everyone involved got their cut. And that much money is enough to keep a lot people quiet for a long, long time.
again, explain why the collapse was announced before it actually happened
even your presubscribed diatribe says nothing about that!
hmm
for HOURS people, police, engineers, surveyors, FDNY, were all saying they that and many other building would be collapsing
While investigating and updating information on the collapse of the towers, someone at the BBC was given a report/press release that building 7 was going to collapse. (its commonly known they were monitoring the news from different outlets and that's where they learned of building 7.) According to the fire department, by 2:00PM they knew the building would soon collapse. Reporters KNEW this well before the collapse because there are videos of reporters talking about it before it happened. So we KNOW reporters were given information on WTC 7's imminent demise. We can conclude from this evidence that the fire department relayed information to reporters that the building was going to collapse. By the time the report reached the reporter at the BBC, it may have simply been miscommunicated from "About to collapse" to "Has collapsed". She even starts out by saying "Details are very, very sketchy". That alone should put this to rest. She didn't say 'Sketchy'. She didn't say 'very sketchy'. She said "very, very sketchy".
It wouldn't be the first time reporters got something so completely wrong. They said it was a small plane at first, remember? They said Kerry choose Gephardt for VP, remember? They told the family members of trapped mine workers that their 13 loved ones were alive, all but one, when it was the other way around. Those are just a few glaring examples. I could go on... Reporters rush to be the first one with the news and often do a poor job of getting the facts straight. History is littered with examples of this.
The downright absurd conspiracy story: The government told many reporters to report something they would have reported anyway after the building collapsed.
I thought destroying documents was the entire reason they brought down WTC 7. Much like the Pentagon, where the documents regarding Rumsfeld's missing $2.3 trillion dollars were magically destroyed the day after he had a press conference about it. Bye bye 2.3 trillion. No one will ever know where you went.
In fiscal 1999, a defense audit found that about $2.3 trillion of balances, transactions and adjustments were inadequately documented. These "unsupported" transactions do not mean the department ultimately cannot account for them, she advised, but that tracking down needed documents would take a long time. Auditors, she said, might have to go to different computer systems, to different locations or access different databases to get information.
so no money was missing. It had to do with bad tracking of the transactions due to discrepancies in the software used to track these transactions.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
