Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-07-2013, 05:09 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,422,794 times
Reputation: 4190

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
Would conservaatives support reduced housing regulation (in order to reduce housing costs and thereby make the current min wage livable) as an alternative to raising the minimum wage?

Naw, probably not.
Zoning laws are so overrated ...

http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/20.../jacobson-text
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-07-2013, 05:22 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,029 posts, read 14,216,690 times
Reputation: 16752
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
So low skill workers should be excited to work for a nickel an hour.
In 1900, that WAS a great wage.
In 2013, not so great.
Wonder who's to blame for debasing the money system?
"Greedy" business?
:-)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 05:48 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,473,071 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrapperJohn View Post
Zoning laws are so overrated ...

Dharavi - National Geographic Magazine

Yes, there IS something to be said for not having to pay off the water goons just to get some water.


Popeye - Goonland (1938) - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 05:57 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,496,494 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
Would conservaatives support reduced housing regulation (in order to reduce housing costs and thereby make the current min wage livable) as an alternative to raising the minimum wage?

Naw, probably not.
what regs are you talking about??

you mean the SAFETY regs...like electrical codes

or the safety regs, like max capacity??

housing regs are not even close to being the problem....but you know that..you have been schooled many times on these boards
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 05:58 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,496,494 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
Yes, there IS something to be said for not having to pay off the water goons just to get some water.
you mean you think you should not have to pay for the water that someone else pumps, and purifies or you??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 06:23 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,473,071 times
Reputation: 9074
mm
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
what regs are you talking about??

you mean the SAFETY regs...like electrical codes

or the safety regs, like max capacity??

housing regs are not even close to being the problem....but you know that..you have been schooled many times on these boards

??? Please explain how "max capacity = 6 related or 2 unrelated" is a SAFETY reg.

THIS ought to be good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 06:27 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,473,071 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
you mean you think you should not have to pay for the water that someone else pumps, and purifies or you??

I prefer buying my water from reputable water goons with actual purification and quality control standards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 06:30 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,496,494 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
mm


??? Please explain how "max capacity = 6 related or 2 unrelated" is a SAFETY reg.

THIS ought to be good.
wtf are you talking about
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 06:31 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,473,071 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
what regs are you talking about??

you mean the SAFETY regs...like electrical codes

or the safety regs, like max capacity??

housing regs are not even close to being the problem....but you know that..you have been schooled many times on these boards

Got proof? Do you really think unrelated occupancy restrictions don't artificially inflate rents?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2013, 06:34 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,473,071 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
wtf are you talking about


Please explain how a housing ordinance which sets maximum capacity at 6 for related individuals and 2 for unrelated individuals is a SAFETY issue.

Put another way, if it is safe for a family of six to live in a house, how is it unsafe instead for three unrelated persons to live in the same house?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top