Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-03-2013, 09:33 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,954,445 times
Reputation: 5661

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
I have to say, I have never been hired by a poor person.
Yes, you have. You just don't realize it. When the poor buy products and services, they create demand. That demand signals employers to hire more employees to meet the demand. Without demand, companies need no employees.

I know how you look at it. The rich business owners -- I mean 'job creators,' hire people out of sheer benevolence and we should bow down and kiss their feet for their generosity and shower them with tax-breaks in gratitude for hiring us worthless peons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-03-2013, 02:01 PM
 
5,915 posts, read 4,814,595 times
Reputation: 1398
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Yes, you have. You just don't realize it. When the poor buy products and services, they create demand. That demand signals employers to hire more employees to meet the demand. Without demand, companies need no employees.

I know how you look at it. The rich business owners -- I mean 'job creators,' hire people out of sheer benevolence and we should bow down and kiss their feet for their generosity and shower them with tax-breaks in gratitude for hiring us worthless peons.
Yes, we need more poor people to increase demand in order to get our economy back on track.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2013, 06:40 PM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 27,020,248 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirdik View Post
Yes, we need more poor people to increase demand in order to get our economy back on track.
The current administration agrees with you and is in the process of creating many,many more of those (poor people) as we speak. Ssshhhh, don't tell anyone you know what's going on or they'll sick the IRS on you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2013, 04:56 AM
bUU
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,709,672 times
Reputation: 8798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haakon View Post
To the left spending $1 by Bush was bad
Where did you get that idea? If you base your contentions on false presumptions, its no wonder what you're saying doesn't make sense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Yes, you have. You just don't realize it. When the poor buy products and services, they create demand. That demand signals employers to hire more employees to meet the demand. Without demand, companies need no employees.
Precisely. Correct and to the point as usual.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirdik View Post
Yes, we need more poor people to increase demand in order to get our economy back on track.
It would be more efficient to have the existing people have more income, so that they can pay their own way and thereby create more economic activity themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-04-2013, 06:33 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 27,020,248 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
Where did you get that idea? If you base your contentions on false presumptions, its no wonder what you're saying doesn't make sense.

Precisely. Correct and to the point as usual.

It would be more efficient to have the existing people have more income, so that they can pay their own way and thereby create more economic activity themselves.
And since those existing "poor" people can't make more it's best to take it from others who are right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2013, 03:13 AM
bUU
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,709,672 times
Reputation: 8798
Nope: It would be more efficient to have the existing people have more income, so that they can pay their own way and thereby create more economic activity themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2013, 03:33 AM
 
8,391 posts, read 6,299,061 times
Reputation: 2314
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
"It is axiomatic that a president who screws over half the population of the country in the most personal way cannot be regarded tenderly by history. By in effect imposing a massive tax increase disguised as health insurance cost increases, after promising that health care costs would go down, he risks what I have dubbed the Obamacare Recession hitting the country hard next year. Families are going to have cut spending on all sorts of discretionary purchases, and restaurants, hard goods producers, housing, and almost all other sectors of the economy are going to be hit hard"
Read more: Blog: Common Core third grade book goes full Dear Leader on Obama

There can be no doubt that the above will prove to be true. When the government demands so much more of your personal income (with you getting nothing in return) the effect it will have on the economy is obvious.

Fewer dollars in circulation to buy goods and services. We will all be hurting. And, the Democrats cannot call it the Bush recession any longer. They own it entirely.

The rest of the above linked article will make you just as sick.

conservatives continue to drift further and further away from reality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2013, 06:59 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 27,020,248 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
Nope: It would be more efficient to have the existing people have more income, so that they can pay their own way and thereby create more economic activity themselves.
Okay, now how exactly is that accomplished? Is it by taking (taxing) from those that make more and giving (tax credits) to those that don't? Is it creating more government programs (giveaways) for those that aren't doing well and then raising the deficit to pay for it which will eventually have to be paid back by someone (probably our kids,grandkids, great grandkids)?

Or, do you encourage all business to expand, encourage small business owners to hire more and/or give raises to employees? Do you set policies that make it easier for joe-down-the-block to start a business then encourage him and help him flourish? Do you set policies that encourage all companies to stay on-shore instead of creating incentives for them to move elsewhere?

What's the answer?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2013, 05:37 AM
bUU
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,709,672 times
Reputation: 8798
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimj View Post
Okay, now how exactly is that accomplished?
We can begin to have that conversation when you sincerely agree with the overriding prioritization rather than simply looking for an excuse to deflect away from it.

Regardless, the reality is that when there is patient in critical condition medical professionals always do two things (1) stabilize the patient, and then (2) apply remediation to prevent recurrence. Right-wingers want to skip to step 2 ignoring step (1), probably because they aren't willing to care enough about the immediate victims of the problem to address the suffering imposed on them by the problem, or because doing so would adversely impact their comparatively petty concerns about their own comfort and luxury. So that's the answer: You do both. We're not going to eradicate poverty, and surely not overnight, but we do have an obligation to redress the impacts of poverty on satisfaction of basic needs, while we're seeking out solutions that better achieve full employment with living wage jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2013, 06:06 AM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,547,733 times
Reputation: 6392
The Soviet Union died a pathetic and ugly death.

Socialist America will do the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top