Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-01-2014, 12:47 PM
 
35,309 posts, read 52,315,210 times
Reputation: 30999

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
Liberal freaks are so accustom to lying through their teeth, I seriously doubt they know what the truth is any longer. AGW scammers are really just liberal freaks making a desperate cry for our help. We should take pity on them and help them get the medication and professional help necessary to overcome their mental illness.

The first step, put Al Gore in a rubber room before he injures someone with one of his insane rants.

Stage two, get the boys at Stanford working on the G-Nome project to identify the defective liberal gene that causes this terrible mental illness.

Stage three, inoculate anyone who registers as Democrat (a tell-tail sign of the onset of mental illness).
Couple of articles you might be interested in, seeing as you brought it up//.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...mental-illness

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...-form-insanity

You’re right-wing? You must be stupid | Politics | spiked
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-01-2014, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,455,656 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by jambo101 View Post
One little problem with your logic: It is not the right-wing that is obsessed with habitually lying all the time. The continuous lies by liberal freaks can only be caused by one of two things: 1) Mental illness; or 2) Their overwhelming desire to destroy the US. I was giving liberal freaks the benefit of the doubt by assuming they were innocent of any malice and just merely diseased.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2014, 12:57 PM
 
15,092 posts, read 8,636,857 times
Reputation: 7432
Quote:
Originally Posted by OpenD View Post
Global climate change is real. And the actual consensus among climate scientists... not the bogus consensus cited by deniers... is that climate change is real, it's dramatic, and the pace of it is accelerating. One organization that takes it very seriously is the Department of Defense. They are devoting substantial resources to dealing with climate change. What do they know that you don't know?
The better question is, what do you not know, and what you ought to start knowing by doing a little personal research on your own instead of parroting this nonsense. The DOD, as well as other major powers are and have been developing "weather weapon technology" for decades. As can automatically be expected from droolers, that is probably all conspiracy theory to you, while there are actual United Nation's treaties banning the use of weather weapons ...which would seem unnecessary if such technology was wild conspiracy theory, no? This falls in line with two other "conspiracy theories", with HAARP, superheating the upper atmosphere with high frequency microwave radiation, and the flipping chemical spraying that goes on right on top of your head, which also doesn't actually exist ... ignoring the fact that the delivery mechanisms for this geo-engineering program have patents on file at the US Patent office. Who knew you could actually patent something that doesn't exist?



Quote:
Originally Posted by OpenD View Post
What the heehawers stubbornly fail to recognize is that climate change shifts weather patterns so dramatically that some places get colder as others get warmer. Glaciers all over the world are rapidly shrinking at ever faster rates. The migration patterns of animals, birds, insects and even fish all over the world are changing rapidly. We're seeing record high temperatures being set at something like 5X the rate of record low temperatures. Large storms are becoming more intense, causing ever more destruction.
What you believe, simply on the statements of proven liars and con artists and pseudo-scientist bureaucrats who want to tax the freaking air we breathe, is not remotely relevant to reality. That reality is that none of what you just mentioned is actually true, and even if it was, it would have nothing to do with carbon dioxcide, and would more likely be the intended or unintended consequences of the madness engaged in by these maniacs manipulating the weather and atmosphere with the aforementioned technology that you think doesn't exist.


Quote:
Originally Posted by OpenD View Post
What does it take to get the deniers to simply look around them at what is actually happening in the natural world instead of yucking it up every time unusually cold temperatures show up?
Pointing out the obvious ... that being that the earth has been experiencing climate events, some so drastic that it kills off almost everything in full blown glaciation, for hundreds of millions of years, and that actual climate cycles are measured in ten's of thousands of years, not decades, apparently escapes your brilliant scientific analysis!!! This is not "yucking up". It's called "thinking", and you should try it sometime ... it's far more reliable than simply believing every cockamamie story fed you by people that have been caught red handed, lying through their teeth.


Quote:
Originally Posted by OpenD View Post
Furthermore, it has been well documented that the hundreds of millions of dollars funding the various climate change denial organizations and "experts" are coming from the very rich individuals and corporations dealing in fossil fuels - coal, oil, gas - who stand to lose big time if they can't sell what they've got.
Compare that to the ten's of billions that have been spent promoting AGW fantassies, and the hundreds of billions (if not trillions) of global carbon taxes they want to impose, and tell me who has the greater $$$ incentives working here?


Quote:
Originally Posted by OpenD View Post
It's estimated that the Koch Brothers stand to gain revenues over $100 Billion - that's with a B - if they can get the Keystone XL pipeline approved. Do you think they care about you, or about your children's future, or your grandchildren's future... or their grandchildren's future? Hell no. They just want more wealth, so they spend money by the bucketful to convince you that "green energy" is bogus, and that there is nothing wrong in burning up fossil fuel reserves and pouring more CO2 into the atmosphere.
Let me introduce you to an even more concerning figure ... try THREE BILLION. I'm not talking dollars or rupees here ... that would be three billion PEOPLE that estimates suggest would DIE, if the AGW recommended actions were to be taken as proposed by these genocidal maniacs.


Quote:
Originally Posted by OpenD View Post
But what do you personally get from buying into their manipulations? Seriously! "Do they think we're stoopid or something?" Why yes, I believe they do... and the evidence is that they're right.
You are in no position to use stupid in referring to anyone ... and most particular toward those trying to educate you, and deprogram you by letting you know about the history of CO2, prior to this brain dead scheme to convince you that what comes out of your mouth in the normal course of breathing is a poison gas. It is NOT a poison gas ... it is in fact the "oxygen" to which plant life breathes, and in gratitude, expells the oxygen we need to survive. This used to be taught in 4th grade biology, before the genocidal maniacs decided to convince you of the reverse, so that you'd champion your own extinction.

The truth in a nutshell is ... the more CO2, the Better ... if you like plants, vegetables, animals, and people on earth, that is!

The other FACT is, that CO2 and temperatures have been much, much higher in earth's history, and it's still here. You might also ask yourself why "Greenland" is called Greenland. There is a clue waiting there for you, and many of you are in dire need of one.

Last edited by GuyNTexas; 01-01-2014 at 01:13 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2014, 01:18 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,455,656 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuyNTexas View Post
The better question is, what do you not know, and what you ought to start knowing by doing a little personal research on your own instead of parroting this nonsense. The DOD, as well as other major powers are and have been developing "weather weapon technology" for decades. As can automatically be expected from droolers, that is probably all conspiracy theory to you, while there are actual United Nation's treaties banning the use of weather weapons ...which would seem unnecessary if such technology was wild conspiracy theory, no? This falls in line with two other "conspiracy theories", with HAARP, superheating the upper atmosphere with high frequency microwave radiation, and the flipping chemical spraying that goes on right on top of your head, which also doesn't actually exist ... ignoring the fact that the delivery mechanisms for this geo-engineering program have patents on file at the US Patent office. Who knew you could actually patent something that doesn't exist?
You realize that HAARP has absolutely nothing to do with the weather, right? HAARP heats up a small portion of the ionosphere to better facilitate communication.

All weather occurs within either the troposphere or stratosphere. The troposphere is the first 6 to 8 miles of atmosphere from the surface, where all local weather can be found. The stratosphere is the next layer of the atmosphere beginning at 6 to 8 miles above the surface, and reaching as far as 31 miles. This is also where the jet streams reside, and if you want to effect the global climate, the stratosphere is where it has to happen.

The ionosphere is from 53 miles to around 370 miles above the surface of the planet. There is no weather here. No winds of any kind. Absolutely nothing that could have any effect on the planet's climate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2014, 01:20 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,226,860 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Global climate change is real. And the actual consensus among climate scientists... not the bogus consensus cited by deniers... is that climate change is real, it's dramatic, and the pace of it is accelerating. One organization that takes it very seriously is the Department of Defense. They are devoting substantial resources to dealing with climate change. What do they know that you don't know?
The climate always changes. That is never the argument. Its AGW which is total bunk. You liberals cloak that argument by calling it climate change to lend some credibility to your failed argument. It hasn't warmed in over 15 years.

Quote:
What the heehawers stubbornly fail to recognize is that climate change shifts weather patterns so dramatically that some places get colder as others get warmer. Glaciers all over the world are rapidly shrinking at ever faster rates. The migration patterns of animals, birds, insects and even fish all over the world are changing rapidly. We're seeing record high temperatures being set at something like 5X the rate of record low temperatures. Large storms are becoming more intense, causing ever more destruction.
There have been fewer and fewer tornados and hurricanes. Arctic ice has made a dramatic comeback. Glaciers expand and shrink all the time. Quit giving legitimacy to lunacy.

Quote:
What does it take to get the deniers to simply look around them at what is actually happening in the natural world instead of yucking it up every time unusually cold temperatures show up?
What does it take to let warmers know it has stopped warming. 15 years ago.

Quote:
Furthermore, it has been well documented that the hundreds of millions of dollars funding the various climate change denial organizations and "experts" are coming from the very rich individuals and corporations dealing in fossil fuels - coal, oil, gas - who stand to lose big time if they can't sell what they've got.
Furthermore, funding to promote the AGW bunk has been coming from radical organizations who wish mankind to return to the stone age. Fossil fuels are here to stay for the foreseeable future. Deal with it.

Quote:
It's estimated that the Koch Brothers stand to gain revenues over $100 Billion - that's with a B - if they can get the Keystone XL pipeline approved. Do you think they care about you, or about your children's future, or your grandchildren's future... or their grandchildren's future? Hell no. They just want more wealth, so they spend money by the bucketful to convince you that "green energy" is bogus, and that there is nothing wrong in burning up fossil fuel reserves and pouring more CO2 into the atmosphere.
Keystone XL is being built. Your idiot squatting in the WH can't stop it. The states approved it and it is underway. Your green energy failure is just that, failure. Billions wasted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2014, 09:53 AM
 
10,793 posts, read 13,547,689 times
Reputation: 6189
It's like a cult........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2014, 11:20 AM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,455,656 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by citizenkane2 View Post
It's like a cult........
If only they were like the Heaven's Gate cult. They could go out and buy a brand new pair of tennis shoes, wait for the next passing comet, then off themselves. We would all be better off and the planet's average IQ would increase by at least 5 points.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2014, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Montreal, Quebec
15,080 posts, read 14,327,358 times
Reputation: 9789
Fox News found to be a major driving force behind global warming denial

American consumers of conservative media like Fox News distrust climate scientists and don't believe the planet is warming.
The results suggest that conservative media consumption (specifically Fox News and Rush Limbaugh) decreases viewer trust in scientists, which in turn decreases belief that global warming is happening. In contrast, consumption of non-conservative media (specifically ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, NPR, The New York Times, and The Washington Post) increases consumer trust in scientists, and in turn belief that global warming is happening.
The study also examined previous research on this issue and concluded that the conservative media creates distrust in scientists through five main methods:
1) Presenting contrarian scientists as "objective" experts while presenting mainstream scientists as self-interested or biased.
2) Denigrating scientific institutions and peer-reviewed journals.
3) Equating peer-reviewed research with a politically liberal opinion.
4) Accusing climate scientists of manipulating data to fund research projects.
5) Characterizing climate science as a religion.

Fox News found to be a major driving force behind global warming denial | Dana Nuccitelli | Environment | theguardian.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2014, 12:31 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,785,325 times
Reputation: 4174
Default 98% of stories ignore that ice-bound ship was on Global Warming mission

You can't make this stuff up, folks.

Time and again, when liberal fanatics schedule events that are supposed to point out how the earth is warming, they wind up getting cancelled because of snow, delayed due to extreme cold, or (in this case) the entire ship that is supposed to demonstrate how sea ice around the South Pole is melting away, gets stuck in "unexpectedly heavy sea ice"!

And naturally, instead of reporting the truth, the media hastily turns away and covers up what really happened.

God keeps giving these people hints. Again, and again, and again. And they keep ignoring them.

That's never a wise thing to do.

-------------------------------------------

Frozen Out: 98% of Stories Ignore That Ice-bound Ship Was On Global Warming Mission | NewsBusters

Frozen Out: 98% of Stories Ignore That Ice-bound Ship Was On Global Warming Mission

By Mike Ciandella | January 2, 2014 | 12:43

A group of climate change scientists were rescued by helicopter Jan. 2, after being stranded in the ice since Christmas morning. But the majority of the broadcast networks’ reports about the ice-locked climate researchers never mentioned climate change.

In fact, rather than point out the mission was to find evidence of climate change, the networks often referred to the stranded people as “passengers,” “trackers” and even “tourists,” without a word about climate change or global warming.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2014, 12:32 PM
 
Location: Calgary, AB
3,401 posts, read 2,285,496 times
Reputation: 1072
Quote:
Originally Posted by citizenkane2 View Post
No....It's like Grape Nuts cereal...........Aint no grapes in it....and no nuts either.

This is junk science that always allows you guys to move the goal posts when reality hits you in the face! LOL!! That's why you guys changed from Global Warming to "Climate Change". WHY??
I see no evidence that supports your claims of junk science. I see other right-wingers saying the same thing, but that's not evidence. It's just a claim. Made by uniformed tabloid readers who can't read graphs and think crying about Al Gore magically makes their lies true. Such claims are worth nothing.

Quote:
Because climate always changes!! LOL!! It's called weather!!
No it isn't. If you don't know the difference between climate and weather, there's no reason to pretend your opinion is informed and has merit. Now go read the Daily Mail links your right-wing friends have sent you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:51 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top