Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Maybe he was and has repressed the memory, and rightfully so!
The pertinent point is that Harrier has chosen to be heterosexual, according to nature.
Baloney, you can remember choosing, but can't remember if you were attracted to men. How convenient. BALONEY. You do not even have sex, so what would you know.
I'm sorry but some heterosexual couples should never become parents, yet we don't care because they are the opposite sex. That makes it ok. Yet here we have loving gay couples who want kids and we deny them based on their sexuality. It's not right.
The whole argument for same sex parent families just because there are "some heterosexual couples who have no business being parents" is inane.
Harrier doesn't care what you choose to do with your partner in the privacy of your own home.
He draws that line at homosexual "marriage" and gays willfully denying children a normal family.
How do gays willfully deny children a normal family? That is just a load of bull. What denies children a healthy family is straight people that have sex without protection and just keep pumping out kids they do not or can not support. But typical to blame it on gays. Gays are willfully providing good homes for the unwanted kids from you straight people. I draw the line at religous people thinking they are the end all. YOU ARE NOT.
The whole argument for same sex parent families just because there are "some heterosexual couples who have no business being parents" is inane.
I am saying that same sex couples love their children just like heterosexuals love theirs. I was pointing out that heterosexuals are not the superior parents.
I am saying that same sex couples love their children just like heterosexuals love theirs. I was pointing out that heterosexuals are not the superior parents.
Neither are homosexuals....you have to.assume that increasing the prospective parenting base by adding homosexuals into the fold will just move along a sliding scale.
No point in arguing for a lateral move.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
