Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-27-2014, 10:45 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 24 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,558 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6041

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by juneaubound View Post
What Obama should have done was lay out clear cut consequences and then followed up with those consequences once the red line was crossed. You know that. All reasonable thinking adults know that. Don't try to make this into a "war mongering conservatives" argument.
This post is a fallacy, Just because you believe something to be true, doesnt make it so. And further more, the OPis indeed arguing that the President either shouldnt have made the redline if he wasnt going to goto war ,or should have gone to war if it was crossed.

The President Never said he was going to war over Syria. So the OP is assuming the actions the he thought the president should have taken,and in so is creating a false narrative as you are committing a Common Appeal Fallacy .

Last edited by dsjj251; 03-27-2014 at 10:54 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-27-2014, 12:03 PM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,670,668 times
Reputation: 20884
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
So the OP thinks Obama should have invaded Syria because he said there was a line?

No

He should not have been dumb enough to "draw a red line" if he was not prepared to take action for violation of that "red line". That was stupid. Obama has no credibility and the world knows it. Do you think Putin would be toying with a Reagan? Reagan would have had NATO install the Ukraine into its ranks when the president of the Ukraine left and scrambled the US Fleet to the Black Sea and the airforce to Polish bases to show that any action would be met with force. One can respond without nukes in a posturing fashion and Obama does not seem to understand this.

We have a child-like fool in the White House who has put US security and the economy in peril, simply due to weak leadership and incompetence. To make matters even worse, he seems to be delusional and not even recognize that he is viewed as weak and incompetent. At least Carter had a clue.

Never draw a gun unless you intend to use it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2014, 12:24 PM
 
4,412 posts, read 3,959,936 times
Reputation: 2326
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
No

He should not have been dumb enough to "draw a red line" if he was not prepared to take action for violation of that "red line". That was stupid. Obama has no credibility and the world knows it. Do you think Putin would be toying with a Reagan? Reagan would have had NATO install the Ukraine into its ranks when the president of the Ukraine left and scrambled the US Fleet to the Black Sea and the airforce to Polish bases to show that any action would be met with force. One can respond without nukes in a posturing fashion and Obama does not seem to understand this.
Who knew Reagan fan fiction was a thing?

In reality reagan wouldn't have done a thing because Ukraine and Russia were both in teh USSR, so no reason to invade. But assuming Reagan was magically the President today his actions back in the 1980s indicate that he would deal with Russia by funding militias and terrorists... I mean, "freedom fighters," to lead a bloody civil wars against the Russian friendly government. Sure, there would be the occasional nun raping, civilian targets, and possible illegal arms and drug deals to pay for it, but at least he'd be doing something!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2014, 12:25 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,187,290 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by juneaubound View Post
What Obama should have done was lay out clear cut consequences and then followed up with those consequences once the red line was crossed. You know that. All reasonable thinking adults know that. Don't try to make this into a "war mongering conservatives" argument.
So Obama should have attacked Syria just because he said so? It is smarter for a leader to be vague with consequences so that they don't show all their cards while they are playing poker. You will never win when everyone knows what cards you are holding.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2014, 12:27 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,187,290 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
No

He should not have been dumb enough to "draw a red line" if he was not prepared to take action for violation of that "red line". That was stupid. Obama has no credibility and the world knows it. Do you think Putin would be toying with a Reagan? Reagan would have had NATO install the Ukraine into its ranks when the president of the Ukraine left and scrambled the US Fleet to the Black Sea and the airforce to Polish bases to show that any action would be met with force. One can respond without nukes in a posturing fashion and Obama does not seem to understand this.

We have a child-like fool in the White House who has put US security and the economy in peril, simply due to weak leadership and incompetence. To make matters even worse, he seems to be delusional and not even recognize that he is viewed as weak and incompetent. At least Carter had a clue.

Never draw a gun unless you intend to use it.
That red line caused Russia to step in and make Syria give up their chemical weapons. Russia would not have done that without pressure from the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2014, 12:35 PM
 
46,961 posts, read 25,998,208 times
Reputation: 29449
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Reagan would have had NATO install the Ukraine into its ranks when the president of the Ukraine left and scrambled the US Fleet to the Black Sea and the airforce to Polish bases to show that any action would be met with force.
You're funny. If his performance is anything to go by, Reagan would have instituted an off-the-books policy to sell missiles to Iran and use the funds to equip - shall we be kind and cal them "irregular forces"? - in the Ukraine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2014, 04:18 PM
 
1,347 posts, read 954,602 times
Reputation: 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
That red line caused Russia to step in and make Syria give up their chemical weapons. Russia would not have done that without pressure from the US.
Huh? Are you in a dreamworld?

Russia stepped in to protect their vassal state - and puppet in assad, who putin knew would likely be killed in a broad US airstrike campaign.

And about that chemical weapons handover that obama lovers enjoy bringing up, how's that doing lately?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2014, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,187,290 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadisonR View Post
Huh? Are you in a dreamworld?

Russia stepped in to protect their vassal state - and puppet in assad, who putin knew would likely be killed in a broad US airstrike campaign.

And about that chemical weapons handover that obama lovers enjoy bringing up, how's that doing lately?
Are they still using chemical weapons on their own people?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2014, 05:30 PM
 
1,347 posts, read 954,602 times
Reputation: 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Are they still using chemical weapons on their own people?
Does anyone know for sure? The obama were claiming for a while before and after it wasn't even assad using them, but the rebels.

And assad is still dropping barrel bombs, artillery and mortars on whole neighborhoods, still slaughtering by the thousands, so what is your point?

Last edited by CaseyB; 03-28-2014 at 04:41 AM.. Reason: language
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-27-2014, 05:33 PM
 
17,468 posts, read 12,940,767 times
Reputation: 6764
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
So the OP thinks Obama should have invaded Syria because he said there was a line?
A leader chooses their words "wisely".......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top