Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But wouldn't normal be how we all came into this world.......from a man and a woman?
And? If you define normal by heterosexual terms, then that is a very loose definition of normal. Would you have sex with a relative of the opposite sex? It falls in your definition of normal.
But you didn't have a choice with your sexual orientation. That was decided for you through biology. I prefer redheads over other types of girls, that is a preference.
And? If you define normal by heterosexual terms, then that is a very loose definition of normal. Would you have sex with a relative of the opposite sex? It falls in your definition of normal.
Not with a relative, a person of the same sex, not a child, and not an animal.
Well I disagree with your choice of normal, but that doesn't change the fact that you didn't choose to be straight.
How didn't I choose?
The question begging will never stop. It's why these discussions never go anywhere. But, that being said, I am not willing to enlist the establishment to enforce my preferences.
Therefore, "natural" is any woman giving birth to a child, no matter what means was used to inseminate the woman.
See how ridiculous "logic" works?
Maybe we need to extend the definition to "natural process of insemination"
You know? Move the goalposts like the quacks did. Sexual Preference to "Sexual Orientation"
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.