Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-01-2014, 11:20 AM
 
1,950 posts, read 1,129,684 times
Reputation: 1381

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
$50 isn't enough. Charge them $100-$200 a year. I'm sure they'll pay because it's just right to do for using less gas.
If you read the thread and use some common sense, you'll see that it's not the right thing to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-01-2014, 11:26 AM
 
17,401 posts, read 11,980,893 times
Reputation: 16155
Quote:
Originally Posted by RegalSin View Post
That is stupid.................and unfair. Electrical cars are suppose to save the enviroment not rape our wallers. I mean seriously why bother.
So if you have an electric car, you didn't "build that".

And electric cars don't "save the environment". That electricity that charges the vehicle is most likely gotten from coal, which isn't exactly environmentally friendly. And those batteries that power the car are HORRIBLE for the environment.

But you tree huggers keep thinking you're doing good for the planet if it helps you sleep at night.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2014, 11:50 AM
 
1,950 posts, read 1,129,684 times
Reputation: 1381
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
So if you have an electric car, you didn't "build that".

And electric cars don't "save the environment". That electricity that charges the vehicle is most likely gotten from coal, which isn't exactly environmentally friendly. And those batteries that power the car are HORRIBLE for the environment.

But you tree huggers keep thinking you're doing good for the planet if it helps you sleep at night.
You're completely wrong on both counts. Almost makes me wonder if you people just believe everything you read or just make stuff up.

Only 39% of our electricity comes from coal. 46% of it comes from natural gas and nuclear. In many states, less than 5% comes from coal. Using electricity to power a vehicle is much more environmentally friendly than oil in a combustion engine. To say otherwise is evidence of pure ignorance.

Additionally, NIMH and Lithium Ion batteries hardly make a dent in the environment compared to combustion of oil-based products. Learn the facts before you go around spreading false information.

http://www.transportation.anl.gov/pdfs/TA/378.PDF
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2014, 11:55 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,068,169 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Hospitality View Post
If you read the thread and use some common sense, you'll see that it's not the right thing to do.
If we were to presume that all three of these were to weigh 3000lbs doing the exact same damage to the road and traveled the US average of about 15K miles:

Gasoline Car @25MPG - pays $300 road tax

Hybrid Car @40MPG - pays $187 road tax

All Electric @~MPG - pays $0 road tax

Obviously charging the Hybrids and electric cars is the right thing to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2014, 11:56 AM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,407,870 times
Reputation: 4025
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
This is not a new tax, it's effectively a replacement tax and at $50 won't even begin to fully replace the lost revenue.

Fact is we need to tax road use and those costs need to be evenly distributed.
No, we don't need to tax road use.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimhcom View Post
Everyone who uses the roads should pay for them including electric cars and bicycles.
No, they should be receiving more tax credits than they already get.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2014, 11:57 AM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,407,870 times
Reputation: 4025
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
If we were to presume that all three of these were to weigh 3000lbs doing the exact same damage to the road and traveled the US average of about 15K miles:

Gasoline Car @25MPG - pays $300 road tax

Hybrid Car @40MPG - pays $187 road tax

All Electric @~MPG - pays $0 road tax

Obviously charging the Hybrids and electric cars is the right thing to do.
Funny how regressively stupid this country has gotten.

You want to "punish" consumers of environmentally-conscious vehicles because they don't pollute cough "fund roads" as much as you? Ha!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2014, 11:58 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,068,169 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Hospitality View Post
In many states, less than 5% comes from coal.
That's fairly limited group especially when you consider the source of what they are importing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2014, 11:59 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,068,169 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opin_Yunated View Post
No, we don't need to tax road use.
Interesting concept, I guess they would just magically build themselves?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2014, 12:02 PM
 
1,950 posts, read 1,129,684 times
Reputation: 1381
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
If we were to presume that all three of these were to weigh 3000lbs doing the exact same damage to the road and traveled the US average of about 15K miles:

Gasoline Car @25MPG - pays $300 road tax

Hybrid Car @40MPG - pays $187 road tax

All Electric @~MPG - pays $0 road tax

Obviously charging the Hybrids and electric cars is the right thing to do.
But that's making silly assumption. Take away all those false assumptions, and you quickly see that it's not the right thing to do.

Not all hybrids achieve 40mpg. There are many compact gasoline cars that achieve 40mpg. Not all cars weigh 3000lbs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2014, 12:06 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,068,169 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Hospitality View Post
But that's making silly assumption. Take away all those false assumptions, and you quickly see that it's not the right thing to do.
I'm using some basic averages and probably should have 4000lbs, for example the hybrid with battery doing very short trips might be getting 100MPG.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top