Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Then if that is the case and the Supreme Court interprets it that way in their decision I hope that the white southerns who lose coverage and can't pay for it go to the voting booths and vote out their state politicians out and replace them with those are willing to open up state exchanges to allow for the subsidies to return. I hope that works for you.
WOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
Look at that race card gt thrown out....WHITE SOUTHERNERS....
From the talk from the left, you would have thought that all republican states did not accept the ACA or to expand medicare....
So are you sure your not talking about those white dems...
Look at that race card gt thrown out....WHITE SOUTHERNERS....
From the talk from the left, you would have thought that all republican states did not accept the ACA or to expand medicare....
So are you sure your not talking about those white dems...
Arizona (not one of the southern states expected to have the 61% of white southerns) is Republican and shot that down and complained that Jan Brewer wanted to expand Medicaid (ACCHCS) even though I know ACCHCS is super hard to enroll into similar to the southern states that are expected to have that issue.
As for the race issue, it's because most would expect blacks would be more adversely affected by the law.
Arizona (not one of the southern states expected to have the 61% of white southerns) is Republican and shot that down and complained that Jan Brewer wanted to expand Medicaid (ACCHCS) even though I know ACCHCS is super hard to enroll into similar to the southern states that are expected to have that issue.
As for the race issue, it's because most would expect blacks would be more adversely affected by the law.
They won't treat the cause...well no crap...why the hell do you think it's called an EMERGENCY room...
Glad you moved the goal post.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee
Sorry, but it will, if it is diagnosed that it is needed, then it will....unless you go to the ER saying, here is my problem, I know the problem....
To get the surgery I needed, I needed to have a consultation with a Dr. To see the Dr., I need to pay upfront or have proof of coverage (health insurance). And to get the surgery done, I have to show proof of coverage or pay upfront both the Dr and hospital were the surgery is getting done....or else no surgery.
Have health insurance can mean the difference between having health care and not having health care in many medical situations. If you don't agree, then we will just have to agree to disagree.
Why would you start counting Post ACA? Thats pretty asinine.. In fact, your link shows they started 4th Quarter 2014..
Obama HIMSELF said we needed to pass ACA in order to insure the 32 million uninsured AMERICANS..
The CBO said we'd never get below 30 million uninsured
Can you do the math on the net decrease, at a cost of $2 Trillion over 10 years
Come on, you're smart enough..
And since we're now talking about 8 million who might lose subsidies.. this is a net loss of how many privately insured individuals? Come on.. baby steps.. you can do it...
Gallup has been tracking the uninsured rate since 2008. The current number (12.3%) is the lowest since they've been tracking it.
We've had this dance before, several times, which makes posting this especially tiring.
Dont care. A tax credit is never the same thing as a tax penalty just like saving ones own money, isnt close to giving money to the government to pay for someone elses insurance.
No matter how many times you try to claim they are the same, they are exact opposites of one another.
Gallup has been tracking the uninsured rate since 2008. The current number (12.3%) is the lowest since they've been tracking it.
We've had this dance before, several times, which makes posting this especially tiring.
Which puts it pretty much where we were prior to the economic collapse.
Are you sure adding ten million to the welfare rolls, is really the definition of an accomplishment you want to try to sell people on?
Especially given the "lowest" is an outright LIE
In fact, the current percentage is pretty much in line with historic going back DECADES...
Bravo at being sold on dog **** = pudding
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
similar to the southern states that are expected to have that issue.
