9,000 Business Have Fled California in Seven Years (cost, states, Oregon)

[urbanlife78]

Originally Posted by PedroMartinez

Since the tallest mountain in Texas is higher than any mountain in the US west of the Mississippi, it is quite clear the poster is not only ignorant of Texas but also butt-hurt.

What? Did you mean "east" of the Mississippi....maybe....

[theunbrainwashed]

Originally Posted by urbanlife78

What? Did you mean "east" of the Mississippi....maybe....

But then again the Mississippi River flows east of Texas

[MIKEETC]

Originally Posted by urbanlife78

What? Did you mean "east" of the Mississippi....maybe....

Probably. With that said, I've been to Texas. Big state...nice scenery in places...loved Dallas and Ft. Worth.

[didn't like San Antonio much, though]

[MIKEETC]

Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed

But then again the Mississippi River flows east of Texas

But Guadalupe Peak, at 8,751 feet ASL and the highest feature in Texas is NOT the highest mountain in the US west of the Mississippi River.

[continental or otherwise]

[theunbrainwashed]

Originally Posted by MIKEETC

But Guadalupe Peak, at 8,751 feet ASL and the highest feature in Texas is NOT the highest mountain in the US west of the Mississippi River.

[continental or otherwise]

Nope, that'd be Mount Whitney in California, or Mount Denali in Alaska if we were gonna include outside of the CONUS

[MIKEETC]

Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed

Nope, that'd be Mount Whitney in California, or Mount Denali in Alaska if we were gonna include outside of the CONUS

That's my point.

[]

[No_Recess]

Originally Posted by freightshaker

I couldn't help but laugh at this, since much of California climate and geography is very similar to Texas..

Uh, no.

[2sleepy]

Originally Posted by LoveToRow

California is going to implode at some point in the future. Liberalism is not sustainable because it isn't based in reality.

We will all be here waiting lololol

[2sleepy]

Originally Posted by emcee squared

How many moved in or were started in the state during that same period of time? I think that would be important in order to determine if this is a problem or not.

California population by year:
2014...38,802,500
2010...37,253,956
2004...35,893,799
2000...33,871,648

You could probably find the breakdown of in migration, births, etc but I'm not interested enough to do the research.

[desertdetroiter]

The jealousy of California continues.