Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Me neither. It's been 7 years since this man left the highest office in the land, and he has made hardly any public appearances. In fact, you can count on one hand how many times he has been seen, and heard, in public.
I find this strange because he was practically worshipped by Republicans for 8 years, his deep Christian faith, his hawkish military adventurism in Iraq, and his defense of traditional marriage had the entire conservative base in the U.S. practically swoon on his every spoken word.
Now all you hear is the sound of crickets. Why is he not out firing up the base on behalf of his brother's flagging aspirations for President? Very, very strange that a man who once had rock star status with the conservative base is now completely forgotten.
Why is this?
Maybe if you would widen your news horizon you would have seen him more.
Because you ONLY watch MSNBC, read Huff post, Media Matters, is NO WONDER you HAVEN'T seen him.
So, whose fault is that?
The fact that you limit your news sources is NOT our faults. It is YOURS!
Maybe if you would widen your news horizon you would have seen him more.
Because you ONLY watch MSNBC, read Huff post, Media Matters, is NO WONDER you HAVEN'T seen him.
So, whose fault is that?
The fact that you limit your news sources is NOT our faults. It is YOURS!
I do watch MSNBC on occasion, usually Morning Joe, where conservatives dominate the conversation. The others I don't pay any attention to. My mainstream sources would report on his appearances, if he were making any.
I hope to see and hear from him when he starts campaigning for his brother Jeb.
People have always had that opinion of Bush, believing he is a decent guy but a terrible President. Contrary, Clinton was a great President but has questionable character.
"he is a decent guy but a terrible President."
I disagree.
"Contrary, Clinton was a great President but has questionable character."
I REALLY disagree with this claim.
Clinton WAS a terrible President AND a terrible person with despicable character.
Then you have Trump, who is a terrible human being AND would make a horrendous president. Seriously, even the Bush presidency (the worst in history) would look downright successful next to a Trump fiasco.
And that's your frontrunner!
Thanks to right-wingers, the GOP is de-evolving right before our eyes. At this rate, a literal clown will win New Hampshire in 2020, instead of a figurative one (Trump).
Obviously you ONLY get your "news" for media Matters and MSNBC.
Yeah, if you ignore the 100k lives he extinguished in Iraq, Bush is a swell guy.
Always the same B.S.
So, tell us which one did YOU support and vote for, and these are ONlY the Senate:
Dem's who voted FOR the wars:
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN) Biden (D-DE)Current VP
Breaux (D-LA)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carnahan (D-MO)
Carper (D-DE)
Cleland (D-GA) Clinton (D-NY)Current Sec of state (Labeled Smartest women in the world by many lefties) Daschle (D-SD)Leader of the Senate at the time and co-sponsored the bill Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND) Edwards (D-NC) Ran for VP
Feinstein (D-CA)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hollings (D-SC)
Johnson (D-SD) Kerry (D-MA) Ran for Pres.
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA) Lieberman (D-CT)Ran for Pres.
Lincoln (D-AR)
Miller (D-GA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Reid (D-NV) Current leader of the Senate
Rockefeller (D-WV) Schumer (D-NY)
Torricelli (D-NJ)
Let me guess, Biden, voted for him TWICE.
Clinton. Unless electing the "first black" was MORE important then voting for the "first woman" President.
Kerry
Or are you too embarrassed to disclose who you voted for?
I do watch MSNBC on occasion, usually Morning Joe, where conservatives dominate the conversation. The others I don't pay any attention to. My mainstream sources would report on his appearances, if he were making any.
I hope to see and hear from him when he starts campaigning for his brother Jeb.
"Morning Joe, where conservatives dominate the conversation."
As a conservative, I would disagree.
"My mainstream sources would report on his appearances, if he were making any."
So, tell us which one did YOU support and vote for, and these are ONlY the Senate:
Dem's who voted FOR the wars:
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN) Biden (D-DE)Current VP
Breaux (D-LA)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carnahan (D-MO)
Carper (D-DE)
Cleland (D-GA) Clinton (D-NY)Current Sec of state (Labeled Smartest women in the world by many lefties) Daschle (D-SD)Leader of the Senate at the time and co-sponsored the bill Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND) Edwards (D-NC) Ran for VP
Feinstein (D-CA)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hollings (D-SC)
Johnson (D-SD) Kerry (D-MA) Ran for Pres.
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA) Lieberman (D-CT)Ran for Pres.
Lincoln (D-AR)
Miller (D-GA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Reid (D-NV) Current leader of the Senate
Rockefeller (D-WV) Schumer (D-NY)
Torricelli (D-NJ)
Let me guess, Biden, voted for him TWICE.
Clinton. Unless electing the "first black" was MORE important then voting for the "first woman" President.
Kerry
Or are you too embarrassed to disclose who you voted for?
None of them sent troops over to Iraq, they only authorized the President to sent troops as a last resort. Bush and only Bush gave the order to start the war.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.