Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Simply amazing. Again, can you tell me how many advanced degrees you hold in science and how many papers you have published in the scientific literature? Yes- that's right- ZERO (and it shows). Stop making a fool of yourself.
Can you tell me how many advanced degrees you hold in any EARTH sciences field and how many papers on climate related science or ANY related EARTH science area you have published in the scientific literature? Yes- that's right- ZERO (and it shows). Even more, it shows that you haven't ever bothered even reading the basics yet you claim 'expertise'. Please, don't stop making a fool of yourself.
You better build dikes if you believe in global warming. Even the Tanaka Foundation, a bunch of global alarmists, acknowledge that to reduce fossil fuel consumption requires "a level of international cooperation unprecedented in human history".
Quote:
Geo-engineering Climate Change
The Tamaki Foundation
On our present course, carbon dioxide will increase in the atmosphere to such an extent that by the middle of this century the global food supply will be diminished by global warming through reductions in crop yields (due to increasing temperature) and decreased water security (for irrigation and consumption). These climate stresses will be greatest in the tropics and subtropics – places where today over a billion people already suffer from food insecurity, and where population is expected to almost double by 2050.
The space based mirrors might work. Can we do it now? It is May and Houston is warming up.
The real solution to global warming is to dramatically reduce the amount of fossil fuel that is burned, but that solution involves a level of international cooperation that would be unprecedented in human history and key statesmen and governments do not consider this a realistic scenario. As such, engineers and scientists in the US (who developed the Star Wars Defense System and the scenarios for how climate would be affected by a global nuclear war) are seriously considering "geoengineering" solutions to global warming, ranging from fertilizing the ocean to increase the marine food chain so that it takes up more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere (thereby disrupting the very foundation of the global food chain) to space-based mirrors that would deflect enough sunlight away from the Earth to cancel out the warming due to the increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
Local governments are going to have to address the issue. History has taught us that there is no global political solution.
You better build dikes if you believe in global warming. Even the Tanaka Foundation, a bunch of global alarmists, acknowledge that to reduce fossil fuel consumption requires "a level of international cooperation unprecedented in human history".
Actually we could pop a few nukes in Nevada and get immediate results with no reduction in consumption.
Actually we could pop a few nukes in Nevada and get immediate results with no reduction in consumption.
Geoengineering is the only possible solution if a problem developed. I might listen to the global warming loons if their "solutions" would accomplish anything more then ship jobs to Asia and tax consumers who ultimately pay the bill.
You even claimed you got an 'A'. Or was it an A+?
So it's "paper(s)" plural now? More than one on global warming? Goodness me! Did you use the same 'sources' you've posted this forum?
How about copying and pasting the essay questions and the References list from your 'college paper(s)' here? You have a copy of your 'paper(s)' on your computer don't you?
I've asked politely several times. I'm sure we could all learn something from your in depth 'research', even if it's just your cited references.
Can you tell me how many advanced degrees you hold in any EARTH sciences field and how many papers on climate related science or ANY related EARTH science area you have published in the scientific literature? Yes- that's right- ZERO (and it shows). Even more, it shows that you haven't ever bothered even reading the basics yet you claim 'expertise'. Please, don't stop making a fool of yourself.
My academic qualifications and professional background isn't in any of the earth sciences fields. But I'm not the one claiming more 'expertise' in all the earth sciences fields involved in climate science than all the scientists who are experts in those fields, like you and Hawkeye are doing.
There is one immutable fact (not theory); the earth heats and cools periodically.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
