What's wrong with gay marriage? (million, officials, foreign, tax)

[paullySC]

Originally Posted by Eastern Roamer

Really... what would happen if homosexuals were allowed to marry? If you oppose it, why?

Ill support it as soon a polygamy is made legal.

[detshen]

Originally Posted by Howest2008

By the way "Buddhists" are all anti-LGBT Homosexual Lesbian Activity.

That's not true, some believe it falls within sexual misconduct, but others feel if no harm is done to others and it is an honorable relationship between two people it should be left alone. Buddhists are opposed to discrimination.

[detshen]

Originally Posted by paullySC

Ill support it as soon a polygamy is made legal.

I think that is a valid point, it's something I have thought about myself, but maybe it's a topic for a new thread.

[Kele]

I see nothing wrong with gay marriage whatsoever. Gay people should have the same right to be as miserable as the rest of us.

[Howest2008]

Originally Posted by RoaminRed

Tell me, oh please do, just how you justify calling homosexuality a "sexual deviation"? Also please please tell me just how you think two men being in love with each other or two women being in love with each other hurts YOUR FAMILY and YOUR MARRIAGE. Tell me, I really want to know just how ignorance like this is propagated.

I feel so damned sorry for your six (!!) kids, growing up in a household of ignorance and oppression. Guess what, though? There's at least a one in ten chance that at least one of your kids IS GAY. I hope to hell they aren't though, not because being gay is wrong or deviant, but because having a parent like you is why gay teens have such a high incidence of suicide.

Would Jesus Discriminate? - Jesus said some are born gay

Jesus never once said that eunuchs were homosexual , now eunuchs didn't
have manly features as other men did because theirs testicles were cut off , they were castrated , and anyone being castrated couldn't acheive or
maintain a genital erection or "enjoy" sexual activity , and for that's reason they were called eunuchs. Eunuchs are not "sexual diviatants" because they can not have sexual relationships with anyone , Homosexuals are "sexual diviatants" because a male sexual genitalial and another male sexual genitalial are not compatible and a female sexual genitalial and another female sexual
genitalial also are not sexuality compatible or linable.

Homosexual "Domestic Partnerships" and "Civil Unions" does not have any effect on my "Hetersexual Marriage" , but "Homosexual Marriage" does because the term "Marriage is a seal of approval from GOD and Society that
the "Sexual Relationship" that you are in is "Approval Of And Sactioned" by
GOD and Society.

[Hasdrubal]

Because every straight person would be forced to convert to homosexuality and marry another of the same sex!

[chielgirl]

Originally Posted by Howest2008

By the way "Buddhists" are all anti-LGBT Homosexual Lesbian Activity.

Excuse me?! Where in the world did you get that information?

Buddhists are against random sex but certainly not against anything in a loving relationship.
There is no such buddhist anti-gay stance.

[buildings_and_bridges]

Originally Posted by paullySC

Ill support it as soon a polygamy is made legal.

You've made this point several times, I've noticed. Would you mind explaining the logic?

[ILOVEOHIO]

Originally Posted by buildings_and_bridges

You've made this point several times, I've noticed. Would you mind explaining the logic?

I, too, am very interested in this explaination.

[Kele]

Originally Posted by Howest2008

Jesus never once said that eunuchs were homosexual , now eunuchs didn't
have manly features as other men did because theirs testicles were cut off , they were castrated , and anyone being castrated couldn't acheive or
maintain a genital erection or "enjoy" sexual activity , and for that's reason they were called eunuchs. Eunuchs are not "sexual diviatants" because they can not have sexual relationships with anyone , Homosexuals are "sexual diviatants" because a male sexual genitalial and another male sexual genitalial are not compatible and a female sexual genitalial and another female sexual
genitalial also are not sexuality compatible or linable.

Homosexual "Domestic Partnerships" and "Civil Unions" does not have any effect on my "Hetersexual Marriage" , but "Homosexual Marriage" does because the term "Marriage is a seal of approval from GOD and Society that
the "Sexual Relationship" that you are in is "Approval Of And Sactioned" by
GOD and Society.

Jesus had nothing to say about enuchs and he had nothing to say about homosexuality. Many people try to stretch his comment n the book of Luke in Chapter 17 when Jesus discusses the second coming with his disciples. Jesus claims, "I tell you, in that night there shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left." I've seen many a preacher try to stretch parable to say that Jesus was addressing homosexuality, but ask them why, if the two men in the bed were homosexuals, was one raptured and the other left behind? They've got no answer for that one.

Marriage was not invented by Christians. I hate to be the one to break it to you, but marriages were occuring long before the advent of Christianity--thus marriage is simply a convention in which two people engage in order to formalize a loving relationship, or in some cases, a business arrangement. It is NOT a "seal of approval" from your sky daddy.

Lastly, I'll thank you not to speak for all of "Society" of which I am a part. I know many people and I'm happy to say that none of them espouse the narrow-minded fundamentalist view you are promoting in this post.