Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I never had to prove anything. They just look at me and ask something, and then let me go.
I'm going to send some police to your house. Just let them in to look around for second. No need to say anything. If you didn't do anything wrong they'll be on their way.
You people have no idea why people who defended your rights get so angry when guys like you **** on the constitution.
You people have no idea why people who defended your rights get so angry when guys like you **** on the constitution.
Please DO NOT defend my right to drive drunk. It's STUPID. The Supreme Court has ruled on this, and I am sorry you don't like their ruling, but it is perfectly Constitutional, and their authority is Constitutional, so it is you who is not respecting the Constitution.
Nice try. But you failed to show me where the constitution gives the government the power to tell me what to eat.
And BTW, nearly all food is not interstate.
Try being a locavore sometime and you will quickly realize how little food is not interstate. (And that still only matters for federal regulation, not state regulation.)
The government only has the power to tell you what food you can buy, not what you can eat. Functionally, that makes it pretty easy to stop you from eating certain foods.
I'm going to send some police to your house. Just let them in to look around for second. No need to say anything. If you didn't do anything wrong they'll be on their way.
You people have no idea why people who defended your rights get so angry when guys like you **** on the constitution.
How about a cavity search? If you don't have anything illegal up your butt, no problem, right?
Please DO NOT defend my right to drive drunk. It's STUPID.
nobody is doing that. You really shouldn't drive drunk or impaired in any other way.
Quote:
The Supreme Court has ruled on this, and I am sorry you don't like their ruling, but it is perfectly Constitutional, and their authority is Constitutional, so it is you who is not respecting the Constitution.
Not true. Just because the Supremes rule on something does not make it right. It only makes it legal. Lots of examples of their rulings on the legality of slavery should tell you that.
And BTW, three of the Supreme judges said it is NOT constitutional.
The government only has the power to tell you what food you can buy, not what you can eat.
Not true at all. Eating a pot brownie is illegal in some states.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
