Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-11-2016, 02:48 PM
 
Location: Elsewhere
88,623 posts, read 84,875,076 times
Reputation: 115183

Advertisements

I think you're making too much of it, OP. There really is no "never forget angle". It's just a slogan that became attached to the event when it happened, and now people say it automatically.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-11-2016, 03:04 PM
 
4,491 posts, read 2,228,383 times
Reputation: 1992
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mightyqueen801 View Post
I think you're making too much of it, OP. There really is no "never forget angle". It's just a slogan that became attached to the event when it happened, and now people say it automatically.
But why did it get attached to the event? Tragedies happen all the time. 9/11 certainly had spectacle and scale, but does quantity of murder necessarily make something worse? I mean, 9/11 was politically motivated, whereas the shooting in Aurora was done just because. Which is more evil? Killing for political purpose or killing for essentially no reason at all? In my mind, I'd rather be killed over politics than killed just because someone can.

And it was politics. Bin Laden stated his motives. It was US support of Israel, sanctions imposed on Iraq, and US military presence in Saudi Arabia. From an objective point of view, none of these views are objectively immoral. I support Israel but you have to understand what it looks like to some people. It's a Western colony, essentially. It has a complicated history, and because it's been there for so long, I don't think either side actually has more of a claim to the land than the other, but I can't say that's it's totally unfair to have a problem with Israel's history. Nor do I think it's wrong to be angered by sanctions or have a foreign military presence in your land. If the French Army set up base in Florida, would be like it? No, but we'd probably not fly a plane into the Eiffel Tower either. But regardless, these points are rarely talked about, and they are incredibly relevant. And when they are talked about, it's often met with some BS about how you must hate America to justify the attack, as if saying why that attack happened is justifying that it happened. But that's the "America **** yeah" view that is often aggressively attached to basically anything that can be used for political purpose.

9/11 was an awful tragedy so it's easy to use. But this doesn't mean we shouldn't talk about it objectively, even if that means saying things that scare the easily scared off. Maybe saying Bin Laden's motivation was simply that he hated America should be recognized for what it is: pointless. It doesn't help. It doesn't actually even explain since it still leaves questions. But if we allow ourselves to get more specific, we can objectively evaluate what happened. Certainly nothing can justify the attack, but maybe we can learn a little about ourselves and understand the enemies point of view. As I said, we'd not tolerate a foreign military in our country. We should we expect others? And that's just one example, and I'm not necessarily saying we should pull our military out of everything. But maybe the discussion of 9/11 shouldn't just always be "everyone who isn't us or on our side is pure evil." Because that discussion doesn't seem to have made the threat of terrorism less prevalent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2016, 03:25 PM
 
Location: Elsewhere
88,623 posts, read 84,875,076 times
Reputation: 115183
Quote:
Originally Posted by skepticratic View Post
But why did it get attached to the event? Tragedies happen all the time. 9/11 certainly had spectacle and scale, but does quantity of murder necessarily make something worse? I mean, 9/11 was politically motivated, whereas the shooting in Aurora was done just because. Which is more evil? Killing for political purpose or killing for essentially no reason at all? In my mind, I'd rather be killed over politics than killed just because someone can.

And it was politics. Bin Laden stated his motives. It was US support of Israel, sanctions imposed on Iraq, and US military presence in Saudi Arabia. From an objective point of view, none of these views are objectively immoral. I support Israel but you have to understand what it looks like to some people. It's a Western colony, essentially. It has a complicated history, and because it's been there for so long, I don't think either side actually has more of a claim to the land than the other, but I can't say that's it's totally unfair to have a problem with Israel's history. Nor do I think it's wrong to be angered by sanctions or have a foreign military presence in your land. If the French Army set up base in Florida, would be like it? No, but we'd probably not fly a plane into the Eiffel Tower either. But regardless, these points are rarely talked about, and they are incredibly relevant. And when they are talked about, it's often met with some BS about how you must hate America to justify the attack, as if saying why that attack happened is justifying that it happened. But that's the "America **** yeah" view that is often aggressively attached to basically anything that can be used for political purpose.

9/11 was an awful tragedy so it's easy to use. But this doesn't mean we shouldn't talk about it objectively, even if that means saying things that scare the easily scared off. Maybe saying Bin Laden's motivation was simply that he hated America should be recognized for what it is: pointless. It doesn't help. It doesn't actually even explain since it still leaves questions. But if we allow ourselves to get more specific, we can objectively evaluate what happened. Certainly nothing can justify the attack, but maybe we can learn a little about ourselves and understand the enemies point of view. As I said, we'd not tolerate a foreign military in our country. We should we expect others? And that's just one example, and I'm not necessarily saying we should pull our military out of everything. But maybe the discussion of 9/11 shouldn't just always be "everyone who isn't us or on our side is pure evil." Because that discussion doesn't seem to have made the threat of terrorism less prevalent.
Ummm, you're preaching to the choir, Dude. I am a WTC survivor who has written and spoken about the need to not turn the event into a reason to identify a "them" as an evil entity that needs to be destroyed.

I really was just commenting on the use of the phrase.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2016, 03:27 PM
 
4,491 posts, read 2,228,383 times
Reputation: 1992
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mightyqueen801 View Post
Ummm, you're preaching to the choir, Dude. I am a WTC survivor who has written and spoken about the need to not turn the event into a reason to identify a "them" as an evil entity that needs to be destroyed.

I really was just commenting on the use of the phrase.
That's fine. My overall answer wasn't really just for you. I had no indication that you would or would not agree with my point either way. I was just making the point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2016, 03:29 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,484,127 times
Reputation: 10343
Quote:
Originally Posted by metalmancpa View Post
9/11 "Never Forget" - why do we push so hard about the never forget angle?
Because collectively we will.

[for better and for worse]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2016, 03:55 PM
 
Location: Elsewhere
88,623 posts, read 84,875,076 times
Reputation: 115183
Quote:
Originally Posted by skepticratic View Post
That's fine. My overall answer wasn't really just for you. I had no indication that you would or would not agree with my point either way. I was just making the point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2016, 04:18 PM
 
7,276 posts, read 5,289,975 times
Reputation: 11477
Quote:
Originally Posted by skepticratic View Post
But why did it get attached to the event? Tragedies happen all the time. 9/11 certainly had spectacle and scale, but does quantity of murder necessarily make something worse? I mean, 9/11 was politically motivated, whereas the shooting in Aurora was done just because. Which is more evil? Killing for political purpose or killing for essentially no reason at all? In my mind, I'd rather be killed over politics than killed just because someone can.

And it was politics. Bin Laden stated his motives. It was US support of Israel, sanctions imposed on Iraq, and US military presence in Saudi Arabia. From an objective point of view, none of these views are objectively immoral. I support Israel but you have to understand what it looks like to some people. It's a Western colony, essentially. It has a complicated history, and because it's been there for so long, I don't think either side actually has more of a claim to the land than the other, but I can't say that's it's totally unfair to have a problem with Israel's history. Nor do I think it's wrong to be angered by sanctions or have a foreign military presence in your land. If the French Army set up base in Florida, would be like it? No, but we'd probably not fly a plane into the Eiffel Tower either. But regardless, these points are rarely talked about, and they are incredibly relevant. And when they are talked about, it's often met with some BS about how you must hate America to justify the attack, as if saying why that attack happened is justifying that it happened. But that's the "America **** yeah" view that is often aggressively attached to basically anything that can be used for political purpose.

9/11 was an awful tragedy so it's easy to use. But this doesn't mean we shouldn't talk about it objectively, even if that means saying things that scare the easily scared off. Maybe saying Bin Laden's motivation was simply that he hated America should be recognized for what it is: pointless. It doesn't help. It doesn't actually even explain since it still leaves questions. But if we allow ourselves to get more specific, we can objectively evaluate what happened. Certainly nothing can justify the attack, but maybe we can learn a little about ourselves and understand the enemies point of view. As I said, we'd not tolerate a foreign military in our country. We should we expect others? And that's just one example, and I'm not necessarily saying we should pull our military out of everything. But maybe the discussion of 9/11 shouldn't just always be "everyone who isn't us or on our side is pure evil." Because that discussion doesn't seem to have made the threat of terrorism less prevalent.
9/11 will forever be a difficult topic of discussion on so many levels. Each of us has our beliefs. If at the top of the pyramid your belief is in the country you inhabit and were born in, the red white & blue, and you are thankful for the opportunities here, then there is nothing wrong about discussing overall motives. I for one believe the towers were targeted as symbols of the western civilization Bin Ladin despised. Of course he's a hypocrite, as he was "as bad" in his own way. But for one second I can understand his distaste for the western world, but then quickly applaud in that he got what he deserved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2016, 04:22 PM
 
6,977 posts, read 5,712,855 times
Reputation: 5177
Quote:
Originally Posted by metalmancpa View Post
This country is filled with historical events that of course should never be forgotten. 9/11 is most definitely one of those events that has had a major impact on the future of the country once it occurred. We can say that about the Civil War, MLK, JFK. In different degrees weather events like Katrina and Sandy impacted as many lives as 9/11, if not more. We fear terrorism now more than ever on US soil, and 9/11 is the obvious catalyst of that fear, so by default it's near impossible as an American to forget 9/11.

I understand the importance of the day and I do somberly reflect the thousands of lives that were lost and the ingrained visions of that morning. But it seems to me as each year passes, the general message of never forget almost seems like a plea out of fear that we will forget. Why is there such a strong assumption with 9/11 about forgetting, at least in the message I hear annually?
if you touch a hot stove and burn your hand and you forget you did that, isn't it possible you'll touch the stove again.


and burn your hand again?

BUT, if you remember, its likely you won't get burnt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2016, 04:23 PM
 
45,238 posts, read 26,470,793 times
Reputation: 24997
Never forget and never honestly examine the reasons!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2016, 04:34 PM
 
3,792 posts, read 2,387,385 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by metalmancpa View Post
This country is filled with historical events that of course should never be forgotten. 9/11 is most definitely one of those events that has had a major impact on the future of the country once it occurred. We can say that about the Civil War, MLK, JFK. In different degrees weather events like Katrina and Sandy impacted as many lives as 9/11, if not more. We fear terrorism now more than ever on US soil, and 9/11 is the obvious catalyst of that fear, so by default it's near impossible as an American to forget 9/11.

I understand the importance of the day and I do somberly reflect the thousands of lives that were lost and the ingrained visions of that morning. But it seems to me as each year passes, the general message of never forget almost seems like a plea out of fear that we will forget. Why is there such a strong assumption with 9/11 about forgetting, at least in the message I hear annually?
It is the justification for a bigger more invasive government and if we forget then they don't have the justification for keeping an eye on us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top