Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-27-2017, 06:43 PM
 
3,304 posts, read 2,174,303 times
Reputation: 2390

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
But race still is a social construct.

The variables within the human species have never been enough to classify humans into sub-species (which is what "race" would be).

We just learned more about the variables and this development does show greater difference between humans but we're still far away from tweaking the work of Linnaeus.
Quote:
Subspecies
a subdivision of a species: such as
a : a category in biological classification that ranks immediately below a species and designates a population of a particular geographic region genetically distinguishable from other such populations of the same species and capable of interbreeding successfully with them where its range overlaps theirs
b : a named subdivision (such as a race or variety) of a taxonomic species
The criteria for grouping subspecies is not clearly defined and is actually very arbitrary. There are obviously geographic variations within the human species. Humans meet the criteria for subspecies classification but we aren't divided that way largely due to ideological reasons. There are separate classified species that have less genetic differences between them than the average differences between human individuals.

 
Old 11-27-2017, 08:23 PM
 
Location: Japan
15,292 posts, read 7,765,220 times
Reputation: 10006
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
Ok. So let's say sub-Saharan Africans are different from the rest of us. Armed with this knowledge, how should government policy be shaped around this?
Government policy should not be shaped around race. Knowing that groups are in fact different, we should be less susceptible to claims that differences in group average outcomes are proof of racism, oppression or other wrongdoing that must be remedied, and more able to resist demands for bad government policies based on these false claims.
 
Old 11-27-2017, 10:23 PM
 
7,300 posts, read 3,400,866 times
Reputation: 4812
Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
But race still is a social construct.

The variables within the human species have never been enough to classify humans into sub-species (which is what "race" would be)
No, race is a completely meaningful classification system that's been purposefully misconstrued by liberals. Historically, mainstream race concepts, whether political or other in nature, never referred to strict speciation any more than the concept of a golden retriever vs an English bulldog refers to speciation. That being said, Golden Retrievers an English Bulldogs are both unique breeds with very different abilities, needs, and valid reasons for independent continued existence.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top