Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-06-2017, 06:55 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,315 posts, read 26,228,587 times
Reputation: 15648

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
You won't get any sympathy from me, an actual immigrant who has gone through the lengthy process. It took me 5 years to get my green card and I was on the fastest track possible. For others, 10-15 years are the norm.

So what they have to wait for 90 days? Get over with it.
Well were you living in a camp for 2-3 years, many of these refugees have already been heavily vetted and the systems has in fact worked. Living with their families in these conditions for another 120 days is deplorable and unnecessary unless Trump has discovered the perfect system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-06-2017, 06:58 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,315 posts, read 26,228,587 times
Reputation: 15648
Quote:
Originally Posted by exm View Post
Trump should issue a new, more specificed EO and let the old one die. That's probably his best way out.

I won't be surprised if that's being worked on.
Why not just wait an put it in place in 90 days instead of disrupting peoples lives, there is no extreme emergency
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2017, 07:05 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,294,125 times
Reputation: 34059
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Why not just wait an put it in place in 90 days instead of disrupting peoples lives, there is no extreme emergency
Had it been announced in advance, even by a week & if it had not included green card holders there wouldn't have been much if any outrage over it. He claimed that he couldn't wait because delaying the program would have resulted in hundreds of terrorists rushing to get here I think Bannon wrote the thing to intentionally create chaos, it's all part of his self admitted "leninist" plot to blow up the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2017, 08:42 PM
 
26,143 posts, read 19,850,298 times
Reputation: 17241
Thumbs down *

Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge
You don't understand what you are reading. They can go abroad for casual visits, and they have every right to expect to be able to return.
Indeed.... IT IS TOTALLY BLIMEY INSANE!!!!!

People who have lived here and ARE KNOWN TO BE OK couldnt get back?? (Doctors,etc)


Its good it was overturned!!!!! - Trump the moron!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2017, 09:53 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
1,187 posts, read 1,023,650 times
Reputation: 256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Why not just wait an put it in place in 90 days instead of disrupting peoples lives, there is no extreme emergency
Simple thing for them is to stop issuing new visas for 90 days instead of showboating it like a travel ban. Or they can just continue extreme vetting. There is no need for all this drama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2017, 12:19 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,036 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
The "insufficient" vetting process could take years, and when the visa and accompanying paperwork was issued (in some cases with clock ticking as some paperwork would expire), the people would then undertake the steps to move from one country to another. Selling their homes, many of their belongings, their cars, quitting their jobs, transferring medical records, school records, etc. These people whose visas were revoked suffered actual damages, legal and financial damages. Even though they are not citizens, they are entitled to argue for redress in a court of law.
How so? They know every step of the way that a visa does not guarantee entry to the US. It just doesn't. There's no legal standing to sue.

"While having a visa does not guarantee entry to the United States, it does indicate a consular officer at a U.S. Embassy or Consulate abroad has determined you are eligible to seek entry for that specific purpose."

https://travel.state.gov/content/vis...-u-s-visa.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2017, 12:28 AM
 
Location: So California
8,704 posts, read 11,124,091 times
Reputation: 4794
Quote:
Originally Posted by ritholtz View Post
Simple thing for them is to stop issuing new visas for 90 days instead of showboating it like a travel ban. Or they can just continue extreme vetting. There is no need for all this drama.

good point. even thought what they did was legal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2017, 01:04 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,036 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel View Post
I don't know if that's accurate or not. I think that's accurate for green card holders, yes, because that establishes permanent residency and thus protections under our Constitution even if out of country (e.g. ability to return).
Not true. Green Card holders are warned that they might not be able to re-enter the US if they choose to travel abroad. They're still aliens who travel on their foreign passport. They can be turned away at Immigration pursuant to Rosenberg v. Fleuti, as noted in Plasencia v. Sureck:

"The Court listed several factors which are relevant to whether a given departure is a meaningful interruption, including the length of the absence, the purpose of the trip, and whether the alien had to obtain special travel documents. The Court also said that "if the purpose of leaving the country is to accomplish some object which is itself contrary to some policy reflected in our immigration laws, it would appear that the interruption of residence thereby occurring would properly be regarded as meaningful."

And as has already been noted, under Immigration Law, POTUS does have the authority to deny entry to aliens. Green Card holders are aliens. They are not US citizens.

8 U.S.C. § 1182(f)

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.



Quote:
However, for those with visas who have not yet entered the United States? I don't actually think they are entitled to redress through our court systems. Well, they could make the case (although I do not think they have standing) but their financial damages are predicated on the idea they would have an absolute assurance they could enter the United States upon issuance of a visa. Yet, even when they obtain the visa, the language is excessively clear that the visa is no guarantee of entry. Thus, any damages they have incurred would be mitigated by this and thus, I do not think they can prove the United States should be responsible for any financial damages they incurred due to their inability to get into our country.
Exactly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2017, 01:11 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,036 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Well were you living in a camp for 2-3 years, many of these refugees have already been heavily vetted and the systems has in fact worked.
Um... no.

Federal agents are reinvestigating Syrian refugees in U.S. who may have slipped through vetting lapse - LA Times - January 25, 2017

"Vetting lapse."

Got that?

That's what Trump was trying to prevent, to keep Americans safe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2017, 05:37 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,315 posts, read 26,228,587 times
Reputation: 15648
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Um... no.

Federal agents are reinvestigating Syrian refugees in U.S. who may have slipped through vetting lapse - LA Times - January 25, 2017

"Vetting lapse."

Got that?

That's what Trump was trying to prevent, to keep Americans safe.
Um yes most refugees are vetted for 2-3 years, this was an error in the vetting and they reexamined those people, there was no need to shut down the system.


If this is what Trump is addressing then let's hear the specifics, he didn't point to any specific incident just that we suddenly became unsafe.


From you link, is Trump going to add on step 22, 23? Terrorists are going to wait in these camps for 2-3 years when they don't even know what country they will end up in, mostly under the age of 14.
This irrational fear is ridiculous, there are plenty of more things to fear than refugees from Syria.


Quote:
The 21-step screening process for Syrian refugees is among the most rigorous for anyone seeking to enter the United States. Typically, the refugees are first screened by the United Nations and then referred to the State Department and other countries for potential resettlement. As they review the applications, U.S. law enforcement and intelligence officials check the names and identities against databases. The process includes the CIA, the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, the National Counterterrorism Center, the State Department and the Department of Defense
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top