Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This admin I don't think will give up on this matter. And I have a hunch they will do something legal(once again) that the activist court system can't undo. Be careful what you wish for.
It's fine if they re do it, there are standards and his impatient approach lost.
This is the point where you re draft it and do it again with larger input, or you do what Trump will do and start Twitter raging about how unfair life has been to him.
Liberals will take any small victory they can get even if it puts their country at risk. That's what happens when you lose for 5 years straight and the next election looking like another defeat.
You just don't see the issue do you? How far will you go in giving the federal government more power to take away people's rights in the interest of "national security". Do we really need to go as far as internment camps just like the Japanese Americans during WW2?
The last president that stepped on Saudi Arabia which was Jimmy Carter, we had gas lines because the Saudis refused to sell us gas. Do you want that? The libs would be crying.. oh, no gas, yet Obama did nothing to get us more oil independent. We are beholden to the Saudis supplying the movement of our economy. Get educated so I don't have to tell you why.
Um things have changed since the Carter era. Read this and educate yourself on the matter:
And besides, if national security is the number one priority and basis for the travel ban, why would he exclude Saudi Arabia and Egypt from the ban? Are you saying higher gas prices are a bigger concern than national security?
This court has to know they are wrong on this. They are doing this for political purposes.
Without googling it, can you name the three judges who sat on the panel? Do you know who appointed them? Do you know who they voted for in the last election?
It's fine if they re do it, there are standards and his impatient approach lost.
This is the point where you re draft it and do it again with larger input, or you do what Trump will do and start Twitter raging about how unfair life has been to him.
Absolutely. Re-draft with a clear mind, some patience, and some input from people who ACTUALLY KNOW what they are doing.
Clear up the green card fiasco and those already with valid visa's and things might go a lot smoother.
Instead, Trump insults the judges and tweets about how everyone treats him unfairly - just exactly like you said.
I'm in favor of anything and everything that gets under Trump's thin skin. Serves him right.
You are weird thinking. Is that what they do. Go against good things that Trump does to keep us safe to get under his skin. What a hoot. How dumb can the left get.
Lets bring in more drugs and cartels, have shoot outs in all the neighborhoods for territory. Saturate all with drugs so they overdose and wind up dead.Oh, that is already happening. Welcome gangs and of course the terrorists . They could get a dirty bomb or a nuclear weapon and take out the liberal cities and you say. I want to get under Trumps skin. You lost all common sense.
Delighted to see our Judicial branch block POTUS from his ridiculous attempts to use his power to build a police state.
By pushing back now we prevent Trump from creating his FAKE narrative of a nation under siege. We are not under attack we are doing great and we can take President Obama for that not farty mac fart face trump.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.