Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Or, more likely, they thought they were sooooo smart that they could get away with it?
Think about it this way: they won an election no one thought that they would or could win.
The amount of hubris shown by this crowd is seemingly infinite.
Why wouldn't they think that they could have multiple conversations at will when they had already pulled off the greatest heist in American history?
Yes and when it was obvious that the media and a dumbed-down electorate was willing to normalize the constant lying and buffoonery, they ran with the ball. Shame on the MSM and shame on the people that stayed home election day in protest when it was clear that this sideshow sake oil salesman should have been stopped from entering The White House.
If Donald Dump put his pants on over his head you would insist that it was his genius that had him doing it that way. He's a liar and a fraud and was too stupid to get that he would be under more scrutiny than he ever imagined. Quit trying to polish the turd.
The logan act has never been prosecuted, and many believe it would fail constitutional muster.
How does a section of the U.S. Constitution not pass constitutional muster?
It's one thing to say that a federal statute or an executive order does not pass constitutional muster. But if the Constitution authorizes the prosecution of individuals for engaging in certain activity, I'm not sure how it would not pass "constitutional muster." That's sort of like saying the Takings Clause doesn't pass constitutional muster. If it's provided for in the Constitution, then it's Constitutional until Congress and the states repeal it or make a superseding amendment.
There's no precedent under the Logan Act, but a lack of precedent doesn't mean it's impossible to prosecute someone under it. Every law at some point has a lack of precedent including the RICO statutes, mail fraud statutes, etc.
He knew at least 17 days that Flynn lied about these Russian phone calls. So why did he wait so long before forcing him to resign? He's very quick to fire people who disagree with him on any other matter
Maybe so..........Maybe not.
I believe that Flynn is the next distraction Trump/Bannon are throwing out to obfuscate the eyeballs on the Administration. Especially if he get's immunity.
He'll spill his guts but insulate the White House.
Maybe so..........Maybe not.
I believe that Flynn is the next distraction Trump/Bannon are throwing out to obfuscate the eyeballs on the Administration. Especially if he get's immunity.
He'll spill his guts but insulate the White House.
Flynn=Shiny Object.
Probably so. I thought of that, too.
Still, one never knows. Best to keep eyes on ALL stories at this time, just in case.
These jerks are slippery as eels.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Or, more likely, they thought they were sooooo smart that they could get away with it?
Think about it this way: they won an election no one thought that they would or could win. The amount of hubris shown by this crowd is seemingly infinite. Why wouldn't they think that they could have multiple conversations at will when they had already pulled off the greatest heist in American history?
EXACTLY!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
