Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 02-21-2017, 07:26 PM
 
34,037 posts, read 17,050,952 times
Reputation: 17197

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cream1 View Post
Redistribute YOUR money all you want. Don't tell me what to do with MINE.



 
Old 02-21-2017, 07:32 PM
 
Location: NYC
16,062 posts, read 26,741,423 times
Reputation: 24848
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
First paragraph is another strawman argument. No one (at least me) is asking for everything from the government. Hell, housing is one area where I think there should be almost no government involved.

And second, education and healthcare give great returns on investment for society, because healthy educated people are more productive than sick dumb people
No healthcare does not give great returns in investment. Currently we spend the most money on healthcare then any country in the world, and we have worse outcomes. We have a reactionary healthcare system that needs to change. We are throwing money at healthcare and it isn't helping.
 
Old 02-21-2017, 07:33 PM
 
Location: Keller, TX
5,658 posts, read 6,275,152 times
Reputation: 4111
Quote:
Originally Posted by baystater View Post
Well.....that is until the robots take over. Correct?
AI eliminating jobs is not a pleasant outcome, but what I said is what I want, which is different than what is going to happen.
 
Old 02-21-2017, 07:37 PM
 
Location: Sitting on a bar stool. Guinness in hand.
4,428 posts, read 6,508,145 times
Reputation: 1721
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nepenthe View Post
AI eliminating jobs is not a pleasant outcome, but what I said is what I want, which is different than what is going to happen.
I was talking more in the scope of replacement of the human race....a...synthetic evolution if you will.

But you point is taken.
 
Old 02-21-2017, 08:30 PM
 
33,387 posts, read 34,832,973 times
Reputation: 20030
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinytrump View Post
You know, you and I may not have enough, but truly there us enough money as long as there are jobs to extract the tax needed. And if you fired the congress of fooling around with people's money and fattening their friends pockets. There is more than enough,,, just mismanaged
the problem comes when you start giving money to a body like congress, regardless of who is running the show, and they start thinking, you know if we could spend just a bit more, we could make more people happy, or we could get more things done, and since we have a constant stream of income, we can kick the incurred debt down the road and pay it off later.

then they think. hey we can sell bonds to the people, that way we dont have to raise taxes right now, and we then have more money to spend. and the cycle continues and gets worse, until we get to where we are now, heavily in debt, and wondering when the collapse is going to happen.

i dont have a problem with creating a safety net for those that absolutely need it, those who are disabled, or too elderly to work, but now apparently we have a huge number of disabled people, who really are just unemployed but might have an issue like diabetes that they can claim as a disability and get "free money".

as for firing everyone in congress, and starting over, you still run into the same issues of these people thinking they have power and then being corrupted by the system they created.
 
Old 02-21-2017, 08:43 PM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,607,699 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
This is a serious question. Considering conservatives are against minimum wage, against redistribution of wealth, against the commons (i.e. publicly funded things like police, schools, fire, etc), against unions, against healthcare. Really, what are they 'for'? And don't use the old personal responsibility line, because that isn't the question.
More importantly, why are so many liberals against choice?
 
Old 02-21-2017, 08:46 PM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,594,858 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
More importantly, why are so many liberals against choice?
Did you really just ask that? Talk to the social conservatives about being against choices....
 
Old 02-21-2017, 08:51 PM
 
729 posts, read 429,312 times
Reputation: 740
Why do democrats think everything in the world is free? Redistribution of wealth hurts the middle class WAAAAY more than the upper 1%, by the way. That's one reason Obamacare is such a disaster/failure.
 
Old 02-21-2017, 08:53 PM
 
8,061 posts, read 4,884,494 times
Reputation: 2460
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
This is a serious question. Considering conservatives are against minimum wage, against redistribution of wealth, against the commons (i.e. publicly funded things like police, schools, fire, etc), against unions, against healthcare. Really, what are they 'for'? And don't use the old personal responsibility line, because that isn't the question.
I'll bite!


Americans do not like Socialism and we like our money!
Paying a fair wage to what the job pays!
Unions have out bid themselves for years.
We support our schools and school choice


Public safety!


Ok you have been educated!
Happy?
 
Old 02-21-2017, 08:54 PM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,594,858 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manimuni View Post
Why do democrats think everything in the world is free? Redistribution of wealth hurts the middle class WAAAAY more than the upper 1%, by the way. That's one reason Obamacare is such a disaster/failure.
No, the PPACA is only viewed as a failure because it was still forced to rely on the private market, and not everyone paid in, quite a few paid the penalty instead of getting insurance. A real nationalized system works much better than the PPACA
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top